Regulatory Decision Summary for Apo-desvenlafaxine

Review decision

The Regulatory Decision Summary explains Health Canada’s decision for the product seeking market authorization. The Regulatory Decision Summary includes the purpose of the submission and the reason for the decision.


Product type:

Drug

Medicinal ingredient(s):

desvenlafaxine

Therapeutic area:

Psychoanaleptics

Type of submission:

New Drug Submission

Control number:

199626
What was the purpose of this submission?

 

The purpose of this New Drug Submission (NDS) for Apo-Desvenlafaxine (desvenlafaxine base) 50 and 100 mg extended-release tablets is to seek an indication for the symptomatic relief of major depressive disorder in adults. Desvenlafaxine succinate is marketed in Canada as Pristiq 50 and 100 mg extended-release tablets (T.M. Wyeth LLC, Canada; Pfizer Canada Inc., Licensee). This submission requests approval based on the existing safety and efficacy data for Pristiq. As Apo-Desvenlafaxine and Pristiq contain desvenlafaxine in different forms, the sponsor is pursuing this submission as a NDS. The sponsor has provided a rationale for the therapeutic equivalence of desvenlafaxine succinate and desvenlafaxine base, as well as the acceptability of comparative bioavailability data based on plasma concentrations of desvenlafaxine base.

 

Why was the decision issued?

 

Desvenlafaxine succinate dissociates into its base form upon solubilisation. The metabolism is expected to be the same whether the succinate salt or base are administered. To support efficacy and safety of the product, the sponsor submitted the results of four bioavailability studies comparing Apo-Desvenlafaxine (desvenlafaxine base) extended-release tablets to the Canadian reference product, Pristiq (desvenlafaxine succinate) extended-release tablets. The results of the studies demonstrate that Apo-Desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg extended-release tablets met the recommended standard for comparative bioavailability with Pristiq 50 and 100 mg extended-release tablets, when administered under both fasting and high-fat fed conditions.

While no clinical efficacy studies were filed for this submission, the difference in the physicochemical form of the medicinal ingredient is not expected to result in a difference in safety or effectiveness. Thus, the demonstration of bioequivalence between this drug and Pristiq is considered to be sufficient as evidence of safety and efficacy, and a Notice of Compliance was issued.

 

Decision issued

Approved; issued a Notice of Compliance in accordance with the Food and Drug Regulations.