Summary Basis of Decision for Aubagio
Review decision
The Summary Basis of Decision explains why the product was approved for sale in Canada. The document includes regulatory, safety, effectiveness and quality (in terms of chemistry and manufacturing) considerations.
Product type:
Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) documents provide information related to the original authorization of a product. The SBD for Aubagio is located below.
Recent Activity for Aubagio
SBDs written for eligible drugs approved after September 1, 2012 will be updated to include post-authorization information. This information will be compiled in a Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT). The PAAT will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada's decisions were negative or positive. PAATs will be updated regularly with post-authorization activity throughout the product's life cycle.
Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT) for Aubagio
Updated:
The following table describes post-authorization activity for Aubagio, a product which contains the medicinal ingredient teriflunomide. For more information on the type of information found in PAATs, please refer to the Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) Project: Phase II and to the list of abbreviations that are found in PAATs.
For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Management of Drug Submissions and Applications Guidance.
Drug Identification Number (DIN):
- DIN 02416328 - 14 mg, teriflunomide, tablet, oral administration
Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT)
Activity/submission type, control number | Date submitted | Decision and date | Summary of activities |
---|---|---|---|
SNDS # 261221 | 2022-04-14 | Issued NOC2022-09-22 | Submission filed as a Level II – Supplement (Safety) to update the PM. The changes were in response to an Advisement Letter issued by Health Canada dated 2022-03-04, requesting revisions related to the pregnancy registry study. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable. As a result of the SNDS, modifications were made to the Warnings and Precautions section of the PM, and corresponding changes were made to Part III: Patient Medication Information. An NOC was issued. |
SNDS # 247354 | 2020-12-11 | Issued NOC2021-05-11 | Submission filed as a Level II – Supplement (Safety) to update the PM with new safety information and to migrate it to the 2020 format. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable. As a result of the SNDS, modifications were made to the Adverse Reactions section of the PM, and corresponding changes were made to Part III: Patient Medication Information. An NOC was issued. |
SNDS # 243821 | 2020-09-10 | Issued NOC2021-02-05 | Submission filed as a Level II – Supplement (Safety) to update the PM with new safety information. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable. As a result of the SNDS, modifications were made to the Warnings and Precautions, and Adverse Reactions sections of the PM, and corresponding changes were made to Part III: Consumer Information. An NOC was issued. |
SNDS # 239626 | 2020-05-25 | Issued NOC2020-10-15 | Submission filed as a Level II – Supplement (Safety) to update the PM with new safety information. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable. As a result of the SNDS, modifications were made to the Warnings and Precautions, Adverse Reactions, and Drug Interactions sections of the PM, and corresponding changes were made to Part III: Consumer Information. An NOC was issued. |
SNDS # 231739 | 2019-09-20 | Issued NOC2020-09-02 | Submission filed as a Level I – Supplement to expand the indication to include patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), including active secondary progressive MS. The sponsor had not filed supporting data and thus the expansion of indication was not acceptable. The submission also included an update to the PM with new safety information. As a result of the SNDS, modifications were made to the Warnings and Precautions, and Adverse Reactions sections of the PM, and corresponding changes were made to Part III: Consumer Information. This was reviewed and considered acceptable, and an NOC was issued. |
SNDS # 221225 | 2018-10-22 | Issued NOC2019-09-26 | Submission filed as a Level I – Supplement to update the PM with new pharmacokinetic data related to pediatric patients. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable, and an NOC was issued. |
Health product advertising complaint | Not applicable | Date received:2019-09-03 | A health productadvertising complaint was received regarding the direct-to-consumer advertising of Aubagio. An explanatory letter was sent. No follow-up was required. |
Summary Safety Review | Not applicable | Posted2017-08-04 | Summary Safety Review for Aubagio (teriflunomide) posted (Assessing the potential risk of sudden kidney injury or kidney stones). |
Summary Safety Review | Not applicable | Posted2017-06-28 | Summary Safety Review for Aubagio (teriflunomide) posted (Assessing the potential risk of inflammation of the colon [colitis]). |
NC # 200227 | 2016-11-14 | Issued NOL2017-02-17 | Submission filed as a Level II (90 day) Notifiable Change (Risk Management Change) to update the PM with new safety information. As a result of the NC, additions were made to the Warnings and Precautions, and Adverse Reactions sections of the PM, and corresponding changes were made to the PM Part III: Consumer Information. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable, and an NOL was issued. |
New safety review started by Health Canada | Not applicable | Started between2016-11-01 | Health Canada started a safety review for Aubagio related to colitis (inflammation of the large intestine [colon]). |
New safety review started by Health Canada | Not applicable | Started between2016-10-01 | Health Canada started a safety review for Aubagio related to acute (renal sudden kidney) failure. |
SNDS # 178643 | 2014-10-06 | Issued NOC2015-09-22 | Submission filed as a Level I – Supplement to provide efficacy and safety data from the TOPIC study, a Phase III, randomized, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled, multinational, 108‑week study conducted in patients who had experienced a single demyelinating event, accompanied by an active inflammatory lesion(s) typical of multiple sclerosis (MS) on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and who were considered to be at high risk of developing clinically definite MS. Historically, patients such as those included in the TOPIC study were diagnosed as having clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), but according to current MS diagnostic criteria these patients are now typically diagnosed as having early stage relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The TOPIC study data were submitted to support a proposed expansion of the approved indication for Aubagio (treatment of RRMS), to include treatment of patients with CIS. In the context of the current MS diagnostic criteria, the proposed expansion of the Aubagio indication to include treatment of patients with CIS/early stage RRMS was not considered approvable, based on the data provided, because the approved RRMS indication does not preclude treatment of patients at an early stage of RRMS, such as those included in the TOPIC study. The TOPIC study did not identify any new/different safety concerns in patients with CIS/early RRMS that were not already reported in the safety database from the original Phase II/III RRMS clinical studies and described in the approved Product Monograph (PM). A brief description of the TOPIC study results has been included in the PM in the Action and Clinical Pharmacology section to provide efficacy and safety information for early stage RRMS patients who may be treated under the approved indication for RRMS, but were not included in the original Phase II/III RRMS clinical studies. With the inclusion of this information for early RRMS patients and new safety information based on post‑marketing data, the benefit/risk of Aubagio may be acceptable for certain patients at an early stage of RRMS and remains acceptable for RRMS patients with more advanced disease. |
Drug Recall posted | Not applicable | Posted2014-07-11 | Drug Recall posted on the Healthy Canadians website, containing important safety information for the general public, healthcare professionals and hospitals. |
Drug product (DIN 02416328) market notification | Not applicable | Date of first sale:2013-11-15 | The manufacturer notified Health Canada of the date of first sale pursuant to C.01.014.3 of the Food and Drug Regulations. |
NDS # 160646 | 2012-11-29 | Issued NOC2013-11-14 | Notice of Compliance issued for New Drug Submission. |
Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) for Aubagio
Date SBD issued: 2014-01-20
The following information relates to the new drug submission for Aubagio.
Teriflunomide, 14 mg, tablet, oral
Drug Identification Number (DIN):
- 02416328
Genzyme Canada a division of Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc.
New Drug Submission Control Number: 160646
On November 14, 2013 Health Canada issued a Notice of Compliance to Genzyme Canada, a division of Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc., for the drug product Aubagio.
The market authorization was based on quality (chemistry and manufacturing), non clinical (pharmacology and toxicology), and clinical (pharmacology, safety, and efficacy) information submitted. Based on Health Canada's review, the benefit/risk profile of Aubagio is favourable as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) to reduce the frequency of clinical exacerbations and to delay the accumulation of physical disability.
1 What was approved?
Aubagio, an immunomodulator agent, was authorized as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) to reduce the frequency of clinical exacerbations and to delay the accumulation of physical disability.
The safety and effectiveness of Aubagio in pediatric patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) below the age of 18 years have not been evaluated. Clinical studies of Aubagio did not include patients over 65 years old, therefore, Aubagio should be used with caution in patients aged 65 years and over.
Aubagio (teriflunomide) is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to teriflunomide, to leflunomide (the parent compound) or to any of the nonmedicinal ingredients in the formulation. Aubagio is also contraindicated in patients who are currently treated with leflunomide, patients who have severe hepatic impairment, patients who are pregnant or of childbearing potential not using reliable contraception, patients with immunodeficiency states [for example (e.g.) acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)], patients with impaired bone marrow function or significant anemias, leucopenia, neutropenia or thrombocytopenia or patients with serious active infections. Aubagio was approved for use under the conditions stated in the Aubagio Product Monograph taking into consideration the potential risks associated with the administration of this drug product.
Aubagio (14mg teriflunomide) is presented as a tablet. In addition to the medicinal ingredient, the tablet contains corn starch, hydroxypropylcellulose, hypromellose, indigo carmine aluminum lake, lactose monohydrate, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, polyethylene glycol, sodium starch glycolate, talc, and titanium dioxide.
For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non-Clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.
Additional information may be found in the Aubagio Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.
2 Why was Aubagio approved?
Health Canada considers that the benefit/risk profile of Aubagio is favourable as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) to reduce the frequency of clinical exacerbations and to delay the accumulation of physical disability.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a serious and severely debilitating chronic autoimmune and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS). It is associated with irreversible progression of disability that includes physical and cognitive impairments, fatigue, pain, depression, and bladder dysfunction. Most patients exhibit an initial course of RRMS that is characterized by acute attacks of neurological disability and relapses caused by acute inflammatory lesions in the CNS, with full recovery or residual effects.
There are several drugs approved for MS in Canada; however, they all carry different indications and have contraindications and safety issues that may limit their administration to patients with a concomitant condition or medication. Only two other products are available in oral formulation which represents an advantage for patients over injection. Having a new oral MS drug available with a novel mechanism of action and safety profile represents an advantage for some patients.
Aubagio has been shown to be efficacious as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with RRMS. Aubagio does not cure RRMS, but it can help decrease the number of relapses and help slow the accumulation of physical disability that RRMS causes.
The market authorization was primarily based on the results of two pivotal Phase III studies, conducted primarily in patients with relapsing remitting MS: TEMSO (EFC6049) and TOWER (EFC10531).
In the study TEMSO, conducted in 1,088 patients (1,086 treated), Aubagio 7 mg and 14 mg administered for 2 years significantly reduced the rate of relapse in patients by 31.2% (p = 0.0002) and 31.5% (p = 0.0005) respectively, compared to the placebo group. Aubagio 14 mg also reduced the risk of 12 week-sustained disability progression by 29.8% (p = 0.0279) while the 7 mg dose did not reach statistical significance with a reduction of 23.7% (p = 0.0835). An effect of Aubagio on various MRI parameters was shown, including burden of disease, percentage of change from baseline in T1-hypointense lesion volume, number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions per scan, number of unique active lesions per scan, and proportion of patients free from Gd-enhancing T1 lesions.
In the second pivotal study, TOWER (EFC10531) conducted in 1,169 patients (1,165 treated), Aubagio 7 mg and 14 mg significantly reduced the rate of relapse by 22.3% (p = 0.0183) and 36.3% (p = 0.0001) respectively, compared to placebo. The risk of sustained disability progression was reduced in the 14 mg group by 31.5% (p = 0.0442) but was not in the 7 mg group with a reduction of 4.5% (p = 0.7620). Based on these efficacy results the sponsor's proposed indications and proposed dosing regimen were restricted to only the 14 mg tablet strength and to reflect the positive, clinically-meaningful results, relating to annualized rate of relapse and disability progression. These results are consistent with the results obtained in study TEMSO and support not authorizing the 7 mg dose for the proposed indication.
The known important identified and potential risks with Aubagio are hepatic effects, teratogenicity, hypertension, hematologic effects and infections. These safety concerns have been addressed through appropriate labelling in the Aubagio Product Monograph. The hepatotoxicity and risks of teratogenicity have been included in the Serious Warnings and Precautions box in the Aubagio Product Monograph.
Teriflunomide, the active ingredient in Aubagio, is the main metabolite of leflunomide (Arava), approved by Health Canada for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis. It is expected that teriflunomide shares some of the adverse reactions previously identified for leflunomide. Therefore, the safety profile of leflunomide may be pertinent to take into consideration when prescribing Aubagio to MS patients.
A Risk Management Plan (RMP) for Aubagio was submitted by Genzyme Canada, a division of Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc., to Health Canada. Upon review, the RMP was considered to be acceptable. RMPs are designed to describe known and potential safety issues, to present the monitoring scheme and when needed, to describe measures that will put in place to minimize risks associated with the product.
Overall, the therapeutic benefits seen in the pivotal studies are positive and the benefits of Aubagio therapy seem to outweigh the potential safety issues. Aubagio has an acceptable safety profile based on the non-clinical data and clinical studies. The identified safety issues can be managed through labelling. Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the Aubagio Product Monograph.
This New Drug Submission complies with the requirements of sections C.08.002 and C.08.005.1 and therefore Health Canada has granted the Notice of Compliance pursuant to section C.08.004 of the Food and Drug Regulations. For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non-Clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.
3 What steps led to the approval of Aubagio?
Submission Milestones: Aubagio
Submission Milestone | Date |
---|---|
Pre-submission meeting: | 2011-09-20 |
Submission filed: | 2012-11-29 |
Screening | |
Screening Acceptance Letter issued: | 2013-01-21 |
Review | |
Biopharmaceutics Evaluation complete: | 2013-09-13 |
Quality Evaluation complete: | 2013-11-08 |
Clinical Evaluation complete: | 2013-11-12 |
Labelling Review complete: | 2013-11-12 |
Notice of Complianceissued by Director General: | 2013-11-14 |
The Canadian regulatory decision on the non-clinical and clinical review of Aubagio was based on a critical assessment of the Canadian data package.The foreign reviews completed by the European Union's centralized procedure European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were used as an added reference.
For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Management of Drug Submissions Guidance.
4 What follow-up measures will the company take?
Requirements for post-market commitments are outlined in the Food and Drugs Act and Regulations.
6 What other information is available about drugs?
Up to date information on drug products can be found at the following links:
- See MedEffect Canada for the latest advisories, warnings and recalls for marketed products.
- See the Notice of Compliance (NOC) Database for a listing of the authorization dates for all drugs that have been issued an NOC since 1994.
- See the Drug Product Database (DPD) for the most recent Product Monograph. The DPD contains product-specific information on drugs that have been approved for use in Canada and have been market notified (that is, the company has told Health Canada the product is being marketed).
- See the Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c)-related documents for the latest fact sheets and notices for products which were issued an NOC under the Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c) Guidance Document, if applicable. Clicking on a product name links to (as applicable) the Fact Sheet, Qualifying Notice, and Dear Health Care Professional Letter.
- See the Patent Register for patents associated with medicinal ingredients, if applicable.
- See the Register of Innovative Drugs for a list of drugs that are eligible for data protection under C.08.004.1 of the Food and Drug Regulations, if applicable.
7 What was the scientific rationale for Health Canada's decision?
7.1 Clinical basis for decision
Clinical Pharmacology
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a serious and severely debilitating chronic autoimmune and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Aubagio (teriflunomide) is an immunomodulatory agent with anti-inflammatory properties that selectively and reversibly inhibits the mitochondrial enzyme dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHO-DH), required for the de novo pyrimidine synthesis. As a consequence teriflunomide blocks the proliferation of stimulated lymphocytes, which need the de novo synthesis of pyrimidine to expand, and may diminish the numbers of activated lymphocytes in peripheral blood. The exact mechanism by which teriflunomide exerts its therapeutic effect in MS is not known, but may involve reduced numbers of activated lymphocytes available for migration into the CNS.
The sponsor conducted a study to support a change in the formulation [that is (i.e.,) removal of colloidal anhydrous silica] and a study to compare the bioavailability of milled and unmilled batches of teriflunomide tablets. The design of the studies and the data submitted were considered acceptable to support the formulation change and the use of unmilled tablets for the manufacturing of the drug substance.
The clinical pharmacological data support the use of Aubagio for the specified indication. Extensive labelling revisions were proposed to address the many safety concerns associated with the use of Aubagio and the proposed revisions were accepted. Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the approved Aubagio Product Monograph to address the identified safety concerns.
For further details, please refer to the Aubagio Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.
Clinical Efficacy
The efficacy of Aubagio (teriflunomide) as monotherapy in the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) was demonstrated in two pivotal Phase III studies: TEMSO and TOWER.
The study TEMSO was a randomized, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of Aubagio in patients with MS exhibiting a relapsing remitting clinical course. The study was conducted in 1,088 patients, of which 1,086 were treated. The study was stratified by centre and by baseline score of the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) [≤3.5 versus (vs.) >3.5]. The patients were randomized (1:1:1) to 1 of the 3 treatment groups (placebo, Aubagio 7 mg or 14 mg daily) and treated for approximately 2 years. The primary efficacy variable in TEMSO was the Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR), defined as the number of confirmed relapses per patient-year. The key secondary variable was confirmed progression of disability for at least 12 weeks, as assessed by the EDSS.
Results from study TEMSO demonstrated that Aubagio 14 mg administered for 2 years significantly reduced the rate of relapse in patients with relapsing remitting MS, by 31.5%(p = 0.0005) relative to the placebo group. Aubagio reduced the risk of 12 week-sustained disability progression by 29.8% (p = 0.0279) at the 14 mg dose. An effect of Aubagio on various magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters was shown, including burden of disease, percentage of change from baseline in T1-hypointense lesion volume, number of Gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing T1 lesions per scan, number of unique active lesions per scan, and proportion of patients free from Gd-enhancing T1 lesions.
The second pivotal study, TOWER, was a randomized, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study that evaluated once daily doses of Aubagio 7 mg and 14 mg in patients with RRMS with mean treatment duration of approximately 18 months. The study was conducted in 1,169 patients, of which 1,165 were treated. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either placebo, Aubagio 7 mg or Aubagio 14 mg, in a ratio of 1:1:1.
Results from study TOWER demonstrated that Aubagio 14 mg significantly reduced the rate of relapse compared to placebo by 36.3% (p = 0.0001) and the risk of sustained disability progression by 31.5% (p = 0.0442). A beneficial effect was observed on the annualized rate of relapses with sequelae and on the adjusted annualized rates of relapses leading to hospitalization.
Based on the efficacy results from the TOWER study, the key secondary variable has failed for the 7 mg dose. Therefore, the sponsor's proposed indications and proposed dosing regimen were restricted to only the 14 mg tablet strength, reflecting the positive, clinically-meaningful results relating to the annualized rate of relapse and disability progression. These results were consistent with the results obtained in the TEMSO study and support not authorizing the 7 mg dose for the proposed indication.
Overall, the efficacy of Aubagio for the treatment of RRMS was demonstrated in the two Phase III clinical studies. The results showed significant reduction in relapse rates and delayed the accumulation of physical disability with Aubagio 14 mg as compared to placebo.
The original proposed indication by the sponsor for Aubagio in the New Drug Submission (NDS) was: "Aubagio (teriflunomide) is indicated for the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) to reduce the frequency of clinical exacerbations, to delay the accumulation of physical disability and to decrease the number and volume of active brain lesions identified on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans".
Following the review of the submission, Health Canada revised the indication to: "Aubagio (teriflunomide) is indicated as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) to reduce the frequency of clinical exacerbations and to delay the accumulation of physical disability".
The proposed revisions to include "adult" in the indication, followed by statements with regards to pediatric and geriatric populations were made to reflect the fact that only MS patients aged 18 to 55 were included in the clinical studies (TEMSO and TOWER). It was requested that "monotherapy" be added to the proposed indication, since the efficacy and safety data from the clinical trials were obtained by administering Aubagio alone, and not concomitantly with other MS drugs.
For more information, refer to the Aubagio Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.
Clinical Safety
The clinical safety evaluation was based primarily on data from the two Phase III pivotal studies (TEMSO and TOWER) and the two supportive studies (Study 2001 and TENERE).
The most common adverse events (AEs) reported with a frequency of ≥10% in the Aubagio14 mg group with a difference of ≥1% compared to placebo were alopecia, diarrhea, increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and nausea.
The cumulative exposure to the product in the monotherapy studies was over 6,200 patient-years up to the data cut-off for this submission. In the pooled analysis of the Phase II and Phase III placebo-controlled studies (Pool I), 2,430 patients with relapsing forms of MS were randomized to receive Aubagio 7 mg (838 patients), Aubagio 14 mg (786 patients) or placebo (806 patients). The median treatment exposure was approximately 680 days across treatment groups. In Pool II (non-controlled including long-term extension studies), 2,284 patients were exposed to Aubagio 7 mg and 14 mg with a maximum exposure of up to 11.1 years. The median duration of study treatment was 2.1 years in the 7 mg and 14 mg Aubagio groups in Pool II.
Teriflunomide is the active metabolite of leflunomide (Arava), approved by Health Canada for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis. Therefore it is expected to share some of the adverse reactions previously identified for leflunomide. The known important identified and potential risks with teriflunomide are hepatic effects, teratogenicity, hypertension, hematologic effects and infections.
Hepatic Effects
In Pool I, the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for hepatic disorders was higher in the Aubagio treatment groups (19.5% and 21.0% on Aubagio 7 mg and 14 mg, respectively) compared to the placebo group (14.6%). The main hepatic AE was an increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT). The percentages of patients with ALT >1 to ≤3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) in the on-treatment period were higher in the Aubagio treatment groups compared to the placebo group with no dose-effect relationship. However, the percentages of patients with ALT >3 to ≤5 times the ULN, ALT >5 to ≤20 times the ULN, or ALT >20 times the ULN were balanced across treatment groups.
Teratogenicity
Toxicologic studies have shown that Aubagio is teratogenic in animals. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies evaluating Aubagio in pregnant women. Pregnant women or women of child bearing potential not taking appropriate contraception method were excluded from the clinical studies and an accelerated elimination procedure to quickly decrease plasma concentration of Aubagio is recommended in case of pregnancy. Therefore, the teratogenic risk of Aubagio in humans remains uncertain.
Hypertension
Hypertension was reported as an AE in 4.2% of patients treated with 14 mg of Aubagio, compared with 2% on placebo. Blood pressure should be verified before the initiation of treatment with Aubagio and periodically thereafter. Elevated blood pressure should be appropriately managed during treatment with Aubagio. There were no reports of hypertensive emergency, e.g., malignant hypertension, hypertensive encephalopathy and no other acute life-threatening complications secondary to increases in blood pressure. In patients who developed hypertension, the introduction or modification of antihypertensive treatment usually led to adequate control of blood pressure.
Bone marrow disorders
In Pool I, the proportion of patients with TEAEs for bone marrow disorders was higher in both Aubagio groups (10.3% and 11.1% in the Aubagio7 mg and 14 mg groups, respectively) compared to the placebo group (3.7%). The main bone marrow related adverse events (AE) were neutrophil and white blood cell (WBC) count decreases.
Regarding laboratory data, an average decrease affecting primarily the WBC count (mainly neutrophil and lymphocyte count decreases) was observed with a small dose effect. The decrease in the mean change occurred during the first 6 weeks followed by stabilization over time while on-treatment. The magnitude did not exceed 15% on average.
Other potential risks
In addition to the identified risks, there are also known important potential risks with Aubagio: hypersensitivity reactions (including severe skin reactions); serious opportunistic infections; cardiovascular effects; malignancies (including lymphoproliferative disorders); peripheral neuropathy; renal failure; interaction with cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme CYP2C8 substrates; interaction with CYP1A2 substrates; interaction with organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3); breast cancer resistant protein (BCRP) transporter and organic anion transporter protein B1(OATP1B1) substrates (especially rosuvastatin); interaction with warfarin; interaction with oral contraceptives; osteoporosis associated with hypophosphatemia; and pancreatic disorders.
To address the known concerns related to the safety of Aubagio, Health Canada has recommended revisions to the sponsor's proposed Product Monograph. These revisions were generally aligned with the approved labelling in the United States and Europe and with labelling for important safety issues observed with the related compound leflunomide (ARAVA). The major safety concerns are clearly highlighted for prescribers and patients.
A Serious Warnings and Precautions Box describing the risk of hepatotoxicity and teratogenicity has been included in the Product Monograph for Aubagio.
For more information, refer to the Aubagio Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.
7.2 Non-Clinical Basis for Decision
The non-clinical pharmacology and toxicology studies support the use of teriflunomide (the medicinal ingredient in Aubagio) as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with RRMS to reduce the frequency of clinical exacerbations and to delay the accumulation of physical disability.
A comprehensive set of non-clinical studies were conducted in in vitro assays and in vivo with various animal models. The review of the non-clinical studies demonstrated that teriflunomide had a teratogenic potential in several studies done in several species. Therefore, in the absence of substantial clinical data, teriflunomide should be considered a potential teratogen in humans. The Product Monograph has been updated to reflect the risk of teratogenicity.
In conclusion, the results of the non-clinical studies as well as the potential risks to humans have been included in the Aubagio Product Monograph. In view of the intended use of Aubagio, there are no pharmacological/toxicological issues within this submission which preclude authorization of the product. Appropriate warnings and precautionary measures are in place in the Aubagio Product Monograph to address the identified safety concerns.
For more information, refer to the Aubagio Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.
7.3 Quality Basis for Decision
The Chemistry and Manufacturing information submitted for Aubagio has demonstrated that the drug substance and drug product can be consistently manufactured to meet the approved specifications. Proper development and validation studies were conducted, and adequate controls are in place for the commercial processes. Changes to the manufacturing process and formulation made throughout the pharmaceutical development are considered acceptable upon review. Based on the stability data submitted, the proposed shelf-life of 36 months is considered acceptable.
Proposed limits of drug-related impurities are considered adequately qualified, i.e., within International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) and are limited to and/or qualified from toxicological studies.
All sites involved in production are compliant with Good Manufacturing Practices.
All non-medicinal ingredients (described earlier) found in the drug product are acceptable for use in drugs according to the Food and Drug Regulations.
None of the excipients used in the manufacture of Aubagio tablets are of human or animal origin.
Related Drug Products
Product name | DIN | Company name | Active ingredient(s) & strength |
---|---|---|---|
AUBAGIO | 02416328 | SANOFI-AVENTIS CANADA INC | TERIFLUNOMIDE 14 MG |