Regulatory Decision Summary for GALEXOS

Review decision

The Regulatory Decision Summary explains Health Canada’s decision for the product seeking market authorization. The Regulatory Decision Summary includes the purpose of the submission and the reason for the decision.


Product type:

Drug

Medicinal ingredient(s):

simeprevir

Therapeutic area:

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Protease Inhibitor (PI)

Type of submission:

Supplement to a New Drug Submission

Control number:

179386
What was the purpose of this submission?

 

This submission was filed to obtain authorization for expansion of an indication for Galexos to treat patients with genotype 4 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection, in combination with peg-interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin, in adults with compensated liver disease.

The submission also provided dosing recommendation for the treatment of hepatitis C virus/human immunodeficiency virus (HCV/HIV) co-infected patients.

 

Why was the decision issued?

 

Health Canada considers that the benefits of Galexos in combination with other medicinal products for the treatment of genotype 4 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in adults with compensated liver disease outweigh the potential risks.

This submission included an open-label, single-arm, Phase III study to evaluate results of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Galexos in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a (PegIFNα-2a) and ribavirin (RBV) in subtreatment-naïve or treatment-experienced, CHC virus genotype-4 infected patients. Patients were treated with Galexos 150 mg administered once-daily for 12 weeks in combination with PegIFNα-2a /RBV. Treatment-naïve patients and prior relapsers received PegIFNα-2a /RBV for response guided treatment (RGT) duration of 24 or 48 weeks. All other patients received PegIFNα-2a /RBV for 48 weeks. Sustained virologic response (SVR) at week 12 (SVR12) was achieved in 82.9% (29/35), 86.4% (19/22), 60.0% (6/10) and 40.0% (16/40) of the treatment-naïve, prior relapser, prior partial-responder, and prior null-responder patients, respectively. The majority of the treatment-naïve and prior relapse patients met the RGT criteria for a shortened PegIFNα-2a /RBV treatment duration of 24 weeks.

New analyses support a total treatment duration of 24 weeks (12 weeks of Galexos + 24 weeks of PegIFNα-2a /RBV) in HCV genotype-1 and genotype-4 treatment-naïve and prior relapser patients with or without cirrhosis who are not co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and those without cirrhosis who are co-infected with HIV. A total treatment duration of 48 weeks (12 weeks of Galexos + 36 weeks of PegIFNα-2a /RBV) is recommended for (1) HCV genotype 1 and genotype 4 infected treatment-naïve and prior relapser patients with cirrhosis who are co-infected with HIV and (2) prior partial and null responders with HCV genotype 1, with or without cirrhosis, with or without HIV co-infection.

Testing for Q80K polymorphism is recommended in HCV genotype-1a infected patients to be treated with Galexos + Q80K /RBV based on the results of the study. In the absence of Q80K information, the general treatment recommendations and treatment stopping rules apply.

Overall, 23.4% (25/107) of patients experienced on-treatment failure. By prior HCV treatment response, most on-treatment failures were observed in prior null-responders (45.0%, 18/40), compared with treatment-naïve (8.6%, 3/35), prior relapsers (9.1%, 2/22), and prior partial-responders (20.0%, 2/10).

The baseline Q80K polymorphismwas not observed among HCV GT4 infected patients at baseline.

With regard to safety, most patients had ≥1 Adverse Events (AE) (98.1%) during the Galexos + PegIFN/RBV treatment phase. The most frequent AEs were influenza-like illness (45.8%), asthenia (42.1%), and fatigue (34.6%). The majority of adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 or 2 (91.6%). Grade 3 or 4 AEs were reported in 6.5% of patients. All grade 3 or 4 AEs were reported in <3% of patients. No patients died during the study. Serious AEs were reported in 5 (4.7%) patients, all of which were considered not or doubtfully related to Galexos by the investigator.

Two serious AEs (diabetes mellitus and anemia) were considered probably related to PegIFNα-2a and RBV. Galexos and RBV were discontinued due to an AE (overdose) in 1 (0.9%) subject. Peginterferon alfa-2a was also discontinued due to an AE (bradycardia) in this subject.

Some AEs were defined as AEs of special interest (increased bilirubin) or of clinical interest [rash (any type), pruritus, anemia, photosensitivity conditions, neutropenia, and dyspnea]. Almost all of these events were grade 1 or 2. The only grade 3 or 4 AEs of interest were neutropenia and anemia, reported in 2 and 1 subject(s), respectively. Adverse events of interest were reported as serious in 1 subject (anemia).

The overall safety results from the final analyses of these studies are similar to the previously established safety profile of Galexos. No new safety concerns were identified.

A review of the presented information indicated that the overall benefit-risk assessment is favorable for the use of Galexos in the treatment of genotype 4 CHC in combination with PegINFα-2a and RBV, in adults with compensated liver disease.

 

Decision issued

Approved; issued Notice of Compliance in accordance with the  Food and Drug Regulations.