Summary Basis of Decision for Viibryd

Review decision

The Summary Basis of Decision explains why the product was approved for sale in Canada. The document includes regulatory, safety, effectiveness and quality (in terms of chemistry and manufacturing) considerations.


Product type:

Drug

Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) documents provide information related to the original authorization of a product. The SBD for Viibryd is located below.

Recent Activity for Viibryd

SBDs written for eligible drugs approved after September 1, 2012 will be updated to include post-authorization information. This information will be compiled in a Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT). The PAAT will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada's decisions were negative or positive. PAATs will be updated regularly with post-authorization activity throughout the product's life cycle.

Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT) for Viibryd

Updated:

2019-12-20

The following table describes post-authorization activity for Viibryd, a product which contains the medicinal ingredient vilazodone hydrochloride. For more information on the type of information found in PAATs, please refer to the Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) Project: Phase II and to the list of abbreviations that are found in PAATs.

For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Management of Drug Submissions Guidance.

Drug Identification Number (DIN):

  • DIN 02442734 - 10 mg, vilazodone hydrochloride, tablet, oral
  • DIN 02443732 - 20 mg, vilazodone hydrochloride, tablet, oral
  • DIN 02443740 - 40 mg, vilazodone hydrochloride, tablet, oral
  • DIN 02443759 - 10 mg and 20 mg, vilazodone hydrochloride, tablets, oral
  • DIN 02443767 - 10 mg, 20 mg and 40 mg, vilazodone hydrochloride, tablets, oral

Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT)

Activity/submission type, control numberDate submittedDecision and dateSummary of activities
Drug product (DIN 02443732) market notificationNot applicableDate of first sale:
2019-05-08
The manufacturer notified Health Canada of the date of first sale pursuant to C.01.014.3 of the Food and Drug Regulations.
NC # 2226402019-01-30Issued NOL
2019-04-15
Submission filed as a Level II (90 day) Notifiable Change to update the PM with new safety information. As a result of the NC, additions were made to the Adverse Reactions section of the PM, and corresponding changes were made to the PM Part III: Patient Medication Information. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable, and an NOL was issued.
NDS # 2221132018-11-20Issued NOC
2019-01-24
Submission filed to transfer ownership of the product (that is [i.e.] drug sponsor name) from Forest Laboratories Canada Inc. to Allergan Inc. and to update the PM and labels. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable, and an NOC was issued.
SNDS # 2100662017-10-10Cancellation Letter Received
2018-10-24
Submission filed as a Level I - Supplement to support a new indication for the treatment of general anxiety disorder. An NOD was issued 2018-07-31 due to deficiencies in the data that prevented a full assessment of the benefit/risk profile. The sponsor subsequently cancelled the submission. Regulatory Decision Summary published.
DIN (DIN 02443767) cancelled (Pre-market)Not applicableDiscontinuation date:
2018-09-13
The manufacturer notified Health Canada that sale of the drug has been discontinued pre-market. Health Canada cancelled the DIN pursuant to section C.01.014.6(1)(a) of the Food and Drug Regulations.
Drug product (DIN 02443759) market notificationNot applicableDate of first sale:
2018-07-06
The manufacturer notified Health Canada of the date of first sale pursuant to C.01.014.3 of the Food and Drug Regulations.
Drug Recall postedNot applicablePosted
2018-05-07
Drug Recall posted on the Healthy Canadians website for healthcare professionals.
Drug product (DINs 02442734, 02443732, 02443740) market notificationNot applicableDate of first sale:
2018-01-31
The manufacturer notified Health Canada of the date of first sale pursuant to C.01.014.3 of the Food and Drug Regulations.
NDS # 1768202014-07-29Issued NOC
2015-07-16
Notice of Compliance issued for New Drug Submission
Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) for Viibryd

Date SBD issued: 2015-09-30

The following information relates to the new drug submission for Viibryd.

Vilazodone hydrochloride, 10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg, tablets, oral

Drug Identification Number (DIN):

  • DIN 02442734 - 10 mg, tablet
  • DIN 02443732 - 20 mg, tablet
  • DIN 02443740 - 40 mg, tablet
  • DIN 02443759 - 10 mg and 20 mg, tablets
  • DIN 02443767 - 10 mg, 20 mg and 40 mg, tablets

Forest Laboratories Canada Inc.

New Drug Submission Control Number: 176820

On July 16, 2015, Health Canada issued a Notice of Compliance to Forest Laboratories Canada Inc. for the drug product Viibryd.

The market authorization was based on quality (chemistry and manufacturing), non-clinical (pharmacology and toxicology), and clinical (pharmacology, safety, and efficacy) information submitted. Based on Health Canada's review, the benefit/risk profile of Viibryd is favourable for the symptomatic relief of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).

1 What was approved?

Viibryd, an antidepressant, was authorized for the symptomatic relief of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).

The short-term efficacy of Viibryd was demonstrated in four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of 8 to 10-weeks. Long-term maintenance of efficacy has not been established. Physicians should periodically re-evaluate the usefulness of the drug for individual patients.

In the elderly population (>65 years of age) no dose adjustment is recommended.

The safety and efficacy of Viibryd have not been established in the pediatric population (<18 years of age).

Viibryd is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to vilazodone or any of the excipients of the drug product. The use of Viibryd is also contraindicated in patients with concomitant use of Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs). Viibryd was approved for use under the conditions stated in the Viibryd Product Monograph taking into consideration the potential risks associated with the administration of this drug product.

Viibryd (10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg, vilazodone hydrochloride) is presented as tablets. In addition to the medicinal ingredient, the tablets contain: colloidal silicon dioxide, FD&C Blue #1 (40 mg tablet only), FD&C Yellow #6 (20 mg tablet only), FD&C Red #40 (10 mg tablet only), lactose monohydrate, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl alcohol, talc, and titanium dioxide.

For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non-Clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

Additional information may be found in the Viibryd Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

2 Why was Viibryd approved?

Health Canada considers that the benefit/risk profile of Viibryd is favourable for the symptomatic relief of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).

Depression is one of the most commonly diagnosed mental illnesses. Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a chronic, debilitating disease associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

Antidepressants are the most commonly prescribed psychiatric drugs; yet, up to half of patients do not achieve appropriate therapeutic outcomes with initial pharmacological treatment and must be switched to alternative prescriptions.

Vilazodone is a new chemical entity with an affinity for the serotonin reuptake site as well as the 5-hydroxytryptamine1A (5HT1A) receptor. Non-clinical studies demonstrated that it potently inhibits the reuptake of serotonin, and acts as a partial agonist of the 5HT1A receptor.

Four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pivotal Phase III trials were submitted to Health Canada to support the proposed indication. In each study, the primary endpoint was the mean difference in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score from baseline to 8 or 10 weeks, depending on the length of the study. This endpoint is validated and is commonly used to support an indication for the treatment of symptoms associated with MDD.

Patients participating in the studies were selected according to acceptable inclusion criteria similar to other MDD studies. There was a slightly greater number of women enrolled in the studies, which aligns with the demographics of people diagnosed with MDD. The efficacy in women and men was similar. There were not enough patients of races other than Caucasian to assess any possible differences in efficacy or safety.

In the placebo-controlled studies, the most commonly observed adverse reactions (incidence ≥5% and at least twice the rate of placebo) in Viibryd-treated MDD patients [number (n) = 1,266] were: diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and insomnia.

In the pivotal studies, 7.3% of the patients who received Viibryd discontinued treatment due to an adverse reaction, compared with 3.5% of placebo-treated patients. The most common adverse reactions leading to discontinuation in at least 1% of the Viibryd-treated patients were nausea (1.4%) and diarrhea (1.1%).

The safety profile of vilazodone is similar to other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants with only diarrhea being reported to an uncommon degree. Additional information has been included in the Adverse Reactions and Patient Information sections of the Product Monograph to inform practitioners and patients of the characteristic safety profile of Viibryd.

While there were no electrocardiogram or blood pressure safety signals noted in the four Phase III studies, statistically significant effects on blood pressure were seen at therapeutic doses in an additional QT study in healthy volunteers (n = 157). These effects were relatively small. A cautionary class statement was included in the Warnings and Precautions section of the Product Monograph with clarification of the data in the Adverse Reactions section.

While there are currently many effective approved antidepressants, response to treatment varies between patients and many benefit from switching from one to another. Similarly, despite comparable safety profiles, patients may find that they tolerate some antidepressants over others. Consequently, given the similar safety and efficacy profiles of Viibryd to other SSRIs, an additional treatment option for patients is beneficial.

A Risk Management Plan (RMP) for Viibryd was submitted by Forest Laboratories Canada Inc. to Health Canada. Upon review, the RMP was considered to be acceptable. The RMP is designed to describe known and potential safety issues, to present the monitoring scheme and when needed, to describe measures that will be put in place to minimize risks associated with the product.

Overall, the therapeutic benefits seen in the pivotal studies indicate that the benefits of Viibryd therapy outweigh the risks for the intended patient population. Viibryd has an acceptable safety profile based on the non-clinical data and clinical studies. Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the Viibryd Product Monograph to address the identified safety concerns.

This New Drug Submission complies with the requirements of sections C.08.002 and C.08.005.1 and therefore Health Canada has granted the Notice of Compliance pursuant to section C.08.004 of the Food and Drug Regulations. For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non-Clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

3 What steps led to the approval of Viibryd?

Submission Milestones: Viibryd

Submission MilestoneDate
Pre-submission meeting:2012-08-15
Submission filed:2014-07-29
Screening
Screening Acceptance Letter issued:2014-09-19
Review
Biopharmaceutics Evaluation complete:2015-04-28
Quality Evaluation complete:2015-07-15
Clinical Evaluation complete:2015-07-15
Labelling Review complete:2015-07-15
Notice of Compliance issued by Director General:2015-07-16

The Canadian regulatory decision on the non-clinical and clinical review of Viibryd was based on a critical assessment of the Canadian data package. The foreign reviews completed by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were used as an added reference.

For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Management of Drug Submissions Guidance.

4 What follow-up measures will the company take?

Requirements for post-market commitments are outlined in the Food and Drugs Act and Regulations.

6 What other information is available about drugs?

Up to date information on drug products can be found at the following links:

7 What was the scientific rationale for Health Canada's decision?
7.1 Clinical basis for decision

Clinical Pharmacology

Viibryd (vilazodone hydrochloride) is both a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and a partial agonist of the 5-hydroxytryptamine1A (5HT1A) receptors. The precise mechanism of the antidepressant effect of Viibryd is not fully understood but presumed to be related to enhancement of serotonergic activity in the central nervous system.

Vilazodone undergoes extensive metabolism in the liver that results in the formation of several metabolites. Even the most potent of the metabolites are unlikely to produce significant central nervous system effects.

Vilazodone has low potential of inhibiting and inducing cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in vitro and in vivo. Vilazodone metabolism is mainly mediated by CYP3A4. An increase of approximately 50% in vilazodone maximum serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) was observed when co-administered with the strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, ketoconazole. Co-administration of vilazodone with the strong CYP3A4 inducer, carbamazepine, decreased the mean Cmax and AUC of vilazodone by approximately 45%.

For further details, please refer to the Viibryd Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

QT Prolongation

The effects of vilazodone on electrocardiogram (ECG) interval and hemodynamic parameters were studied in a randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled, parallel group ECG assessment study performed in 157 healthy volunteers. Volunteers who were randomized to vilazodone treatment [number of patients (n) = 66] received sequential ascending doses of 10 mg/day, 20 mg/day, 40 mg/day, 60 mg/day, and 80 mg/day over a 15 day period, with each dose being administered for three days. 

Vilazodone was associated with a dose- and concentration-related increase in heart rate at supratherapeutic doses of 60 mg/day and 80 mg/day, but not at the therapeutic 20 mg/day and 40 mg/day doses. The proportion of subjects with high heart rate values >90 bpm was larger in the vilazodone group than in the placebo group and showed dose-dependency.

Small, but statistically significant, prolongation of the QTc interval was observed at the 20 mg and 40 mg therapeutic doses, but not the 60 mg and 80 mg supratherapeutic doses. The time course (the varying activity of a medicine over time following administration) of these changes was erratic and not clearly consistent with a treatment-related effect. A concentration-effect analysis was not suggestive of QTc prolongation at therapeutic exposures. Considering the erratic time course and lack of dose-dependency, the QTc prolongation observed at the lower doses might be a reflection of imperfect control of study conditions or confounding autonomic effects.

Vilazodone was associated with a dose-dependent increase in systolic blood pressure at doses of 20 mg/day and higher in healthy volunteers.

Caution is recommended if vilazodone is administered to subjects with pre-existing hypertension. Baseline and periodic on-treatment blood pressure monitoring is recommended. Treatment-emergent hypertension may warrant discontinuation or management with anti-hypertensive therapies. Information regarding possible effects of vilazodone on heart rate and blood pressure is included in the Warnings and Precautions section of the Product Monograph.

However, no electrocardiogram or blood pressure safety signals were noted in the four Phase III studies in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

The clinical pharmacological data support the use of Viibryd for the specified indication.

For more information, refer to the Viibryd Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Efficacy

The efficacy of Viibryd (vilazodone hydrochloride) as a treatment for MDD was demonstrated in four Phase III, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in adult (18-70 years of age) outpatients who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for MDD.

Three of the studies were 8 weeks in duration and evaluated the efficacy of Viibryd 40 mg (Studies 1-3). The other study was 10 weeks in duration and evaluated the efficacy of Viibryd 20 mg and 40 mg (Study 4). For each study, patients were randomized to either Viibryd (20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo once daily with food. Patients were titrated over 1 week to a dose of 20 mg Viibryd daily or over 2 weeks to a dose of 40 mg Viibryd daily taken with food.

The main inclusion criteria were:

  • For Studies 1 and 2 - a Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D)-17 score of ≥22 and a HAM-D item 1 (depressed mood) score of ≥2 at the screening and baseline visits.
  • For Studies 3 and 4 - a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS - a validated scale for depression that is commonly used in this type of study) score of ≥26.

The primary efficacy parameter in all studies was the change in total score from baseline to week 8 (Studies 1-3) or week 10 (Study 4) in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The secondary efficacy parameter in Studies 3 and 4 was the change from baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity score.

Additional efficacy parameters in all four studies included MADRS response rate (defined as ≥50% improvement in MADRS total score compared with baseline), change from baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) total score, and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) total score. In addition, MADRS remission (defined as MADRS total score <10), HAM-D-17 total score, HAM-D-17 response (≥50% improvement in HAM-D total score compared with baseline) and remission (HAM-D17 <7), and change from baseline in HAM-D-17 total score were assessed in Studies 1 and 2. CGI-I response rates (CGI-I ≤2) were assessed in Studies 1, 3 and 4, and MADRS sustained response rate (defined as MADRS total score ≤12 for at least the last two consecutive visits during the double-blind treatment period) was assessed in Studies 3 and 4. These additional endpoints were considered exploratory and were not used to support the indication.

All of the Phase III studies had statistically and clinically significant results which indicated the efficacy of Viibryd in patients with MDD.

The data generated from the program established that results from the four pivotal studies demonstrated a consistent pattern of therapeutic response to Viibryd. Study 4 demonstrated that both the 20 mg and 40 mg doses of Viibryd were effective in the treatment of adult patients with MDD as measured by change from baseline in MADRS total score. The results of the secondary endpoint in studies 3 and 4 were consistent with the results of the primary outcome and were considered supportive.

No long term placebo-controlled, blinded studies were performed. A 52-week, uncontrolled, open-label study was conducted to assess the long-term safety of Viibryd in patients with MDD. A secondary objective of this study was to assess MADRS total score and CGI-Improvement scores over 52 weeks. The mean MADRS total score and mean CGI-Improvement scores decreased gradually during the 52-week treatment period, indicating maintenance of improvement of symptoms over time. Because this was an uncontrolled study and included no placebo or other comparator, no conclusions can be drawn about the effectiveness of Viibryd, but the results of this study are consistent with the findings in the four pivotal studies of Viibryd.

For more information, refer to the Viibryd Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Safety

The safety of Viibryd was primarily established in the four pivotal studies described in the Clinical Efficacy section.

Nine hundred seventy-eight patients were exposed to a 40 mg once-daily dose of Viibryd in the combined Phase III studies. A further 288 patients were exposed to a 20 mg once-daily dose, for a total exposure of 1,266 patients equivalent to 184.1 patient-years. During the conduct of placebo-controlled Phase II studies, 903 patients (113.8 patient-years) were exposed to doses lower than 40 mg, and 227 (28.8 patient-years) were exposed to doses greater than 40 mg. Five hundred ninety-nine patients participated in an open-label, uncontrolled, 52-week study to assess the long-term safety of Viibryd.

In the four pivotal Phase III studies, Viibryd-treated patients experienced more treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) than placebo-treated patients [78% versus (vs.) 64%], more serious adverse events (SAEs) (1.5% vs. 1.0%), and discontinued more often due to adverse events (AEs) (7.3% vs. 3.5%). In general, the AE profile for Viibryd-treated patients was similar to other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The most commonly reported TEAEs (≥5% of Viibryd-treated patients at an incidence at least twice that of placebo) were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and insomnia. The first occurrence of these events was usually within the first week of treatment. The mean durations were 18 days for diarrhea, 15 days for nausea, 3 days for vomiting, and 28 days for insomnia.

Most of the reported TEAEs were mild or moderate. More Viibryd-treated patients reported SAEs compared to placebo (5.6% vs. 4.2%). Most of these SAEs were related to gastrointestinal disorders, nervous system disorders, and psychiatric disorders. The most over-reported TEAEs for Viibryd treatment vs. placebo treatment were diarrhea (28.1% vs. 9.5%) and nausea (23.4% vs. 6.8%). The rate of nausea was similar to that seen with other SSRIs; however the rate of diarrhea was higher than expected. Information regarding the higher frequency of diarrhea is included in the Adverse Reactions and Patient Information sections of the Product Monograph.

Treatment-emergent adverse events associated with suicide were similar between treatment groups. There was no completed suicide in the Phase III studies. There were two suicide attempts by patients treated with 40 mg vilazodone.

For more information, refer to the Viibryd Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

7.2 Non-Clinical Basis for Decision

Vilazodone was the subject of an extensive non-clinical program. The toxicology program conducted was considered sufficient to support the indication of symptomatic relief of MDD in adults.

Evaluation of vilazodone hydrochloride in in vitro and in vivo pharmacology and toxicology studies in mice, rats, rabbits, and dogs was conducted at exposure levels exceeding those in humans and at doses higher than the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD). In dogs, significant clinical signs were noted at high doses and four deaths related to convulsions occurred at systemic exposures 7- to 24-times higher than at the MRHD. In mice and rats, vilazodone was well tolerated up to and including maximal feasible doses.

Histiocytosis was observed in the intestinal and abdominal lymphatic systems after 13 weeks of dosing at ≥270 mg/kg/day in mice and rats. The histiocytes had a vacuolated cytoplasm containing crystal clefts consistent with intracytoplasmic storage of vilazodone or its metabolites. Fibrohistiocytic granulomas seen in the rat carcinogenicity study in mesenteric lymph nodes, mainly at ≥25 mg/kg/day, and other lymphatic tissues at the high dose of 150 mg/kg/day, were assumed to have the same etiology. Vilazodone was not mutagenic in vitro and, while clastogenic in vitro, it was negative for clastogenic activity in both an in vivo rat bone marrow chromosome aberration assay and a micronucleus test. Vilazodone was also negative in an in vivo/in vitro unscheduled deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) synthesis assay in rats.

Vilazodone hydrochloride did not induce tumors in rats at doses up to 150 mg/kg/day. In mice, increased incidences of malignant mammary gland tumors in females at 45 and 135 mg/kg/day may be related to increased prolactin levels, a mechanism known to cause mammary tumors in rodents and to which rodents are sensitive. The incidence of hepatocellular adenomas and/or carcinomas increased at all dose levels (15, 45 and 135 mg/kg). Increased incidences of thyroid gland follicular cell hyperplasia at all dose levels and adenomas in mice given 45 and 145 mg/kg/day were observed.

Vilazodone had no effect on the fertility of female rats. Decreased fertility was noted in male rats at doses of 125 mg/kg/day. The systemic exposure at the 25 mg/kg No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) was predicted to be approximately four-times that at the MRHD. Effects on sperm quality have been reported with other SSRIs. Vilazodone treatment during organogenesis resulted in embryofetal toxicity evident from lower fetal body weight gain and delayed skeletal ossification in rats and rabbits, but no teratogenic effects. Vilazodone hydrochloride administered to pregnant rats during organogenesis and throughout pregnancy and lactation resulted in maternal and developmental toxicity, including reduced pup survival and delayed maturation at all dose levels. The Product Monograph includes a warning that use in pregnant women should be undertaken only after consideration of the potential harm to the fetus.

For more information, refer to the Viibryd Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

7.3 Quality Basis for Decision

The Chemistry and Manufacturing information submitted for Viibryd has demonstrated that the drug substance and drug product can be consistently manufactured to meet the approved specifications. Proper development and validation studies were conducted, and adequate controls are in place for the commercial processes. Changes to the manufacturing process and formulation made throughout the pharmaceutical development are considered acceptable upon review. Based on the stability data submitted, the proposed shelf life of 36 months is acceptable.

All sites involved in production are compliant with Good Manufacturing Practices.

All non-medicinal ingredients (described earlier) found in the drug product are acceptable for use in drugs according to the Food and Drug Regulations.

The lactose monohydrate used in the manufacture of vilazodone tablets is of bovine origin. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)/Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy (TSE) documentation for lactose monohydrate was provided by the sponsor. The lactose monohydrate used is sourced from healthy animals under the same conditions as milk collected for human consumption and no other ruminant or animal materials are used in the preparation of such derivates.