Summary Basis of Decision for Inrebic

Review decision

The Summary Basis of Decision explains why the product was approved for sale in Canada. The document includes regulatory, safety, effectiveness and quality (in terms of chemistry and manufacturing) considerations.


Product type:

Drug

Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) documents provide information related to the original authorization of a product. The SBD for Inrebic is located below.

Recent Activity for Inrebic

The SBDs written for eligible drugs (as outlined in Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision [SBD] Project: Phase II) approved after September 1, 2012 will be updated to include post-authorization information. This information will be compiled in a Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT). The PAAT will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada's decisions were negative or positive. The PAATs will be updated regularly with post-authorization activity throughout the product life cycle.

 

The following table describes post-authorization activity for Inrebic, a product which contains the medicinal ingredient fedratinib (supplied as fedratinib hydrochloride). For more information on the type of information found in PAATs, please refer to the Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) Project: Phase II and to the List of abbreviations found in Post-Authorization Activity Tables (PAATs).

 

For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Guidance Document: The Management of Drug Submissions and Applications.

Updated: 2024-07-17

Drug Identification Number (DIN):

DIN 02502445 – 100 mg fedratinib, capsule, oral administration

 

Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT)

Activity/Submission Type, Control Number

Date Submitted

Decision and Date

Summary of Activities

SNDS # 276471

2023-06-21

Issued NOC 2024-07-04

Submission filed as a Level II – Supplement (Safety) to update the PM with new safety and efficacy information. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable. As a result of the SNDS, modifications were made to the Drug Interactions and Dosage and Administration sections of the PM. Corresponding changes were made to Part III: Patient Medication Information and to the package insert. An NOC was issued.

SNDS # 283036

2024-01-23

Issued NOC 2024-05-28

Submission filed as a Level II – Supplement (Safety) to update the PM with new safety information. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable. As a result of the SNDS, modifications were made to the Serious Warnings and Precautions Box; Warnings and Precautions; Adverse Reactions; and Dosage and Administration sections of the PM. Corresponding changes were made to Part III: Patient Medication Information and to the package insert. An NOC was issued.

NDS # 280373

2023-10-27

Issued NOC 2023-11-23

Submission filed to transfer ownership of the drug product from Celgene Inc. to Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada. An NOC was issued.

SNDS # 272670

2023-02-23

Issued NOC 2023-07-12

Submission filed as a Level I – Supplement to revise the outer carton and inner bottle labels.  The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable, and an NOC was issued.

SNDS # 261408

2022-02-10

Issued NOC 2022-12-13

Submission filed as a Level I – Supplement for the addition of a new drug substance manufacturing site and/or manufacturer. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable, and an NOC was issued.

Public Advisory

Not applicable

2022-11-01

Public Advisory posted (Canadian labelling for all JAK inhibitors to include risks of serious heart-related problems, fatal blood clots and cancer), containing important information about labelling for the general public and public health professionals.

Health Professional Risk Communication

Not applicable

Posted 2022-10-31

Health Professional Risk Communication posted (Janus Kinase Inhibitors and the Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, Thrombosis [Including Fatal Events] and Malignancy), containing important safety information for healthcare professionals.

SNDS # 265425

2022-06-22

Issued NOC 2022-10-11

Submission filed as a Level I – Supplement to revise the outer carton and inner bottle labels.  The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable, and an NOC was issued.

SNDS # 263696

2022-04-27

Issued NOC 2022-09-14

Submission filed as a Level II – Supplement (Safety) to update the PM with new safety information. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable. As a result of the SNDS, modifications were made to the Warnings and Precautions section of the PM, and corresponding changes were made to Part III: Patient Medication Information and to the package insert. An NOC was issued.

SNDS # 253094

2021-05-26

Issued NOC 2021-09-10

Submission filed as a Level II – Supplement (Safety) to update the PM with safety-related changes and migrate it to the 2020 format. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable. As a result of the SNDS, modifications were made to the Drug Interactions section of the PM, and corresponding changes were made to Part III: Patient Medication Information and to the package insert. An NOC was issued.

Drug product (DIN 02502445) market notification

Not applicable

Date of first sale: 2021-05-20

The manufacturer notified Health Canada of the date of first sale pursuant to C.01.014.3 of the Food and Drug Regulations.

NDS # 229866

2019-07-19

Issued NOC 2020-07-27

NOC issued for New Drug Submission.

Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) for Inrebic

Date SBD issued: 2020-10-22

The following information relates to the New Drug Submission for Inrebic.

Fedratinib (supplied as fedratinib hydrochloride)

Drug Identification Number (DIN):

  • DIN 02502445 - 100 mg fedratinib, capsule, oral administration

Celgene Inc.

New Drug Submission Control Number: 229866

 

On July 27, 2020, Health Canada issued a Notice of Compliance to Celgene Inc. for the drug product Inrebic.

The market authorization was based on quality (chemistry and manufacturing), non-clinical (pharmacology and toxicology), and clinical (pharmacology, safety, and efficacy) information submitted. Based on Health Canada's review, the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of Inrebic is favourable for the treatment of splenomegaly and/or disease-related symptoms in adult patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, including patients who have been previously exposed to ruxolitinib.

 

1 What was approved?

 

Inrebic, an antineoplastic agent, was authorized for the treatment of splenomegaly and/or disease-related symptoms in adult patients with intermediate‑2 or high-risk primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, including patients who have been previously exposed to ruxolitinib.

No data are available to Health Canada regarding the use of Inrebic in patients younger than 18 years of age. Therefore, Health Canada has not authorized an indication for pediatric use.

Of the total number of patients with myelofibrosis who received an Inrebic dose of 400 mg in the clinical studies, 47.3% were over 65 years of age and 12.3% were over 75 years of age. No overall differences in safety or effectiveness of Inrebic were observed between these patients and younger patients.

Inrebic is contraindicated in patients who are hypersensitive to this drug or to any ingredient in the formulation, including any non-medicinal ingredient, or component of the container.

Inrebic was approved for use under the conditions stated in its Product Monograph taking into consideration the potential risks associated with the administration of this drug product.

Inrebic (100 mg fedratinib, supplied as fedratinib hydrochloride) is presented as a capsule. In addition to the medicinal ingredient, the capsule contains gelatin, red iron oxide, silicified microcrystalline cellulose, sodium stearyl fumarate, titanium dioxide, and white ink.

For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non‑clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

Additional information may be found in the Inrebic Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

 

2 Why was Inrebic approved?

 

Health Canada considers that the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of Inrebic is favourable for the treatment of splenomegaly and/or disease-related symptoms in adult patients with intermediate‑2 or high-risk primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, including patients who have been previously exposed to ruxolitinib.

Myelofibrosis belongs to the group of Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. It may arise de novo as primary myelofibrosis or evolve from previously diagnosed polycythemia vera (post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis) or essential thrombocythemia (post-essential thrtombocythemia myelofibrosis). Myelofibrosis is characterized by stem-cell derived clonal myeloproliferation, bone marrow fibrosis, abnormal cytokine expression, anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis, constitutional symptoms, cachexia, leukemic progression, and shortened survival.

The annual incidence of myelofibrosis is estimated at 0.4 to 1.4 cases per 100,000 individuals in Western countries. Estimates from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of Canada indicate that approximately 200 patients were diagnosed with myelofibrosis in 2016, and 1,400 and 2,177 Canadians have, or have had, myelofibrosis. Patients with myelofibrosis are at risk for premature death due to disease progression, leukemic transformation, thrombohemorrhagic complications, and infections. The estimated median survival for the intermediate‑2 and high-risk disease is 2.6 and 1.3 years, respectively.

Most patients with polycythemia vera (96%) and over half of patients with essential thrombocythemia (55%) and primary myelofibrosis (65%) have a mutation in the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) gene, typically JAK2V617F mutation. The JAK2V617F mutation causes the substitution of valine for phenylalanine at codon 617 in the JAK2 protein, a member of the JAK family of protein tyrosine kinases. These proteins are vital components in signalling mechanisms related to essential cellular functions, such as differentiation, proliferation, and survival.

Currently, the only curative treatment for patients with myelofibrosis is allogeneic stem cell transplant. However, most patients are not eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplant due to advanced age and comorbidities. Ruxolitinib, a selective inhibitor of the JAK kinases, JAK1 and JAK2, is the only approved drug for the treatment of splenomegaly and/or its associated symptoms in adult patients with primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.

The medicinal ingredient in Inrebic, fedratinib, is an oral kinase inhibitor with activity against wild type and mutationally activated JAK2 and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3). Fedratinib is a JAK2-selective inhibitor with higher potency for JAK2 over family members JAK1, JAK3, and TYK2. In animal models of JAK2V617F-driven myeloproliferative disease, fedratinib blocked phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT3/5) proteins, and improved survival and disease-associated signs, including white blood cell counts, hematocrit, splenomegaly, and fibrosis.

The market authorization of Inrebic was based on data derived from two pivotal trials: one Phase III (JAKARTA) and one Phase II study (JAKARTA-2). In both studies, treatment with 400 mg of Inrebic taken orally once daily resulted in a significant and meaningful clinical benefit, exhibited as spleen volume reduction and total symptom score reduction in patients with intermediate‑2 or high risk primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis, and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.

In the JAKARTA trial, Inrebic demonstrated clinically significant improvement in the spleen response rate (i.e., the proportion of patients with a greater than or equal to 35% reduction in spleen volume at the end of cycle 6, confirmed 4 weeks later), which was 36.5% in the Inrebic 400 mg group as compared to 1.0% in the placebo group (p<0.0001). In addition, the proportion of patients with a 50% or greater reduction in the total symptom score was 40.4% in the Inrebic 400 mg group and 8.6% in the placebo-treated patients.The estimated median duration of spleen response to Inrebic 400 mg was 18.2 months.

Results from the Phase II (JAKARTA-2) trial, conducted in myelofibrosis patients previously exposed to ruxolitinib, were consistent with the results obtained in JAK2-inhibitor-naïve patients. Relative to baseline, treatment with Inrebic 400 mg once daily led to a greater than or equal to 35% reduction in spleen volume in 30.9% of patients and a 50% or greater reduction in the total symptom score in 26.7% of patients.

Results obtained from both studies demonstrated clinical improvement and confirmed the robustness of the primary efficacy analysis data. In addition, results were consistent across preselected patient subgroups by demographic and disease characteristics, such as risk status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, spleen volume, and spleen size.

The safety profile of Inrebic was well characterized and consistent across clinical studies. Diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting were the most common adverse reactions. The most frequent hematologic adverse reactions were anemia and thrombocytopenia. The toxicities were manageable with dose reductions or dose interruptions and appropriate supportive care. Serious cases of encephalopathy, including Wernicke's encephalopathy, a neurologic emergency resulting from thiamine (vitamin B1) deficiency, were reported in 1.3% (8/608) of patients treated with Inrebic in clinical trials and 0.16% (1/608) of cases were fatal. Specific warnings, including a Serious Warnings and Precautions box are present in the Inrebic Product Monograph to highlight the risk of serious and fatal encephalopathy, including Wernicke's encephalopathy. The Inrebic Product Monograph contains recommendations for assessing thiamine levels in all patients prior to starting Inrebic, periodically during treatment, and as clinically indicated. It also warns that treatment with Inrebic should not be initiated in patients with thiamine deficiency.

Fedratinib is extensively metabolized by human cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and to a lesser extent by CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and flavin-containing monooxygenases. Concomitant administration of Inrebic with strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors may increase fedratinib exposure leading to a risk of adverse reactions. Therefore, a starting dose reduction is recommended when administering Inrebic with strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors.

A 50% reduction in starting dose and close monitoring is recommended for patients with severe renal impairment. For patients with pre-existing moderate hepatic impairment, more intensive safety monitoring and if necessary, dose modifications, are advised. The use of Inrebic should be avoided in patients with severe hepatic impairment.

A Risk Management Plan (RMP) for Inrebic was submitted by Celgene Inc. to Health Canada. Upon review, the RMP was considered to be acceptable. The RMP is designed to describe known and potential safety issues, to present the monitoring scheme and when needed, to describe measures that will be put in place to minimize risks associated with the product.

The submitted inner and outer labels, package insert and Patient Medication Information section of the Inrebic Product Monograph meet the necessary regulatory labelling, plain language and design element requirements.

A Look-alike Sound-alike brand name assessment was performed and the proposed name, Inrebic, was accepted.

Inrebic has an acceptable safety profile based on the non-clinical data and clinical studies. The identified safety issues can be managed through labelling and adequate monitoring. Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the Inrebic Product Monograph to address the identified safety concerns.

This New Drug Submission complies with the requirements of sections C.08.002 and C.08.005.1 and therefore Health Canada has granted the Notice of Compliance pursuant to section C.08.004 of the Food and Drug Regulations. For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non‑clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

 

3 What steps led to the approval of Inrebic?

 

Submission Milestones: Inrebic

Submission Milestone Date
Pre-submission meeting 2019-03-26
Submission filed 2019-07-19
Screening  
Screening Deficiency Notice issued 2019-08-30
Response filed 2019-10-09
Screening Acceptance Letter issued 2019-10-15
Review  
Biostatistics Evaluation complete 2020-05-27
Biopharmaceutics Evaluation complete 2020-06-01
Review of Risk Management Plan complete 2020-06-30
Quality Evaluation complete 2020-07-15
Labelling Review complete, including Look-alike Sound-alike brand name assessment 2020-07-20
Clinical/Medical Evaluation complete 2020-07-23
Notice of Compliance issued by Director General, Therapeutic Products Directorate 2020-07-27

 

The Canadian regulatory decision on the review of Inrebic was based on a critical assessment of the data package submitted to Health Canada. The foreign review completed by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was used as an added reference.

For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Management of Drug Submissions Guidance.

 

4 What follow-up measures will the company take?

 

Requirements for post‑market commitments are outlined in the Food and Drugs Act and Regulations.

 

6 What other information is available about drugs?

 

Up to date information on drug products can be found at the following links:

 

7 What was the scientific rationale for Health Canada's decision?
7.1 Clinical Basis for Decision

 

Clinical Pharmacology

The medicinal ingredient in Inrebic, fedratinib, is an oral kinase inhibitor with activity against wild type and mutationally activated Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3). Fedratinib is a JAK2-selective inhibitor with higher potency for JAK2 over family members JAK1, JAK3, and TYK2. Abnormal activation of JAK2 is associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms, including myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera.

Fedratinib inhibits cytokine-induced phosphorylation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT3) protein in whole blood from patients with myelofibrosis.

Following oral administration, fedratinib is rapidly absorbed, achieving maximum plasma concentration within 0.5 to 4 hours. Steady-state plasma levels of fedratinib are reached within 15 days of once daily dosing, with an approximately threefold accumulation.

Fedratinib is metabolized by multiple cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in vitro, with the predominant contribution from CYP3A4 and with a lesser contribution from CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and flavin-containing monooxygenases. Concomitant administration of Inrebic with strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors may increase fedratinib exposure leading to an increased risk of adverse reactions. Therefore, a starting dose reduction is recommended when administering Inrebic with strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors. The effect of concomitant administration with strong or moderate CYP3A4 inducers is unknown.

No clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of fedratinib was observed in subjects with mild hepatic impairment compared to that in subjects with normal hepatic function. The pharmacokinetics of fedratinib has not been evaluated in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C).

Following a single 300 mg dose of fedratinib, the area under plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUCinf) increased by 1.5-fold in subjects with moderate renal impairment and by 1.9-fold in subjects with severe renal impairment compared to that in subjects with normal renal function. Accordingly, dose reduction of Inrebic is recommended in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance 15 mL/min to 29 mL/min as estimated by Cockcroft-Gault equation).

A dedicated drug-food interaction study demonstrated that the exposure to Inrebic was not affected by food. However, a high-fat, high-calorie meal significantly decreased nausea and vomiting associated with Inrebic.

For further details, please refer to the Inrebic Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Efficacy

The efficacy of Inrebic in the treatment of intermediate‑2 or high-risk myelofibrosis, including patients previously exposed to ruxolitinib, is supported by the results of two pivotal studies: one Phase III (JAKARTA) and one Phase II clinical trial (JAKARTA-2).

The JAKARTA trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm Phase III study in patients with intermediate‑2 or high-risk primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis with splenomegaly and a platelet count greater than or equal to 50 x 109/L. The patients had not been previously treated with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. The study randomized 289 patients in a ratio of 1:1:1 to receive Inrebic 400 mg (number of patients [n] = 96), Inrebic 500 mg (n = 97) or placebo (n = 96) once daily for at least six consecutive 28-day cycles.

In the intention-to-treat population (all randomized patients), the median age was 65 years (range of 27 to 86 years), 47% of patients were older than 65 years, and 59% of patients were male. Most patients (64%) had primary myelofibrosis, 26% had post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis, and 10% had post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Fifty-two percent of patients had intermediate‑2 risk and 48% had high-risk disease. At baseline, patients had a median palpable spleen length of 15 cm and a median spleen volume of 2,568 mL (range of 316 mL to 8,244 mL) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) in patients with contraindications for MRI. The median normal spleen volume is approximately 215 mL. Most patients (73.7%) had constitutional symptoms (weight loss greater than 10% over a year before screening, fever persisting for more than one month, or sweats persisting for more than one month). Overall, 67% of patients presented with V617F mutations of JAK2 gene. Per the study criteria, no patients had received prior treatment with a JAK2 inhibitor. However, most patients (73%) had received at least one prior therapy for myelofibrosis.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the spleen response rate defined as the proportion of patients with a 35% or greater reduction in spleen volume (measured by MRI or CT) from baseline to the end of cycle 6 (at week 24) and confirmed 4 weeks later. An Independent Review Committee conducted a blinded review of the MRI/CT images.

The key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a 50% or greater reduction in total symptom score from baseline to the end of cycle 6 as measured by the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 diary. The MFSAF v2.0 diary captures the six core symptoms of myelofibrosis: night sweats, itching, abdominal discomfort, early satiety, pain under ribs on left side, and bone or muscle pain. Patients completed the diary daily during the week prior to day 1 of each treatment cycle and at the end of cycle 6. Symptom scores ranged from 0 ("absent") to 10 ("worst imaginable"). The reductions in total symptom score from baseline suggest an improvement in symptom burden.

The study met its primary endpoint. A spleen response rate of 36.5% was demonstrated in the Inrebic 400 mg group as compared to 1.0% in the placebo group (p<0.0001). The spleen response rate at the end of cycle 3 was 42.7% in the Inrebic 400 mg group versus 1.0% in the placebo group, indicating an early spleen response to treatment. Overall, 49.0% of patients receiving Inrebic 400 mg versus 2.1% of placebo-treated patients (p<0.0001) achieved a 25% or greater reduction in spleen volume. Based on Kaplan-Meier estimates, the median duration of spleen response was 18.2 months for the Inrebic 400 mg group. The proportions of patients with a reduction of at least 50% in the total symptom score were 40.4% and 34.8% in the Inrebic 400 mg and 500 mg groups, respectively, versus 8.6% in the placebo group. Both doses of Inrebic demonstrated a significant meaningful clinical benefit over the placebo. However, the study results did not establish any significant benefit of the 500 mg dose over the 400 mg dose. Therefore, the recommended dose of Inrebic is 400 mg daily. An early termination of JAKARTA precluded sufficient follow-up to determine progression-free survival, overall survival, and long-term safety outcomes. The median duration of exposure to Inrebic 400 mg was 62 weeks (range of 1 to 91.9 weeks).

The JAKARTA-2 trial was a Phase II, multicentre, open-label, single-arm study in patients previously exposed to ruxolitinib with a diagnosis of intermediate-1 with symptoms, intermediate‑2 or high-risk myelofibrosis with splenomegaly and a platelet count greater than or equal to 50 x 109/L. The primary efficacy endpoint was the spleen response rate at the end of cycle 6 as measured by MRI/CT. Of note, the JAKARTA-2 study did not require a confirmatory MRI/CT scan 4 weeks later. The key secondary endpoint was the symptom response rate, defined as the proportion of patients with a 50% or greater reduction in total symptom score from baseline to the end of cycle 6 as measured by the MFSAF v2.0 diary. Ninety-seven patients previously exposed to ruxolitinib were enrolled in the study and received a starting dose of Inrebic 400 mg once daily. The median age was 67 years (range of 38 to 83 years), 58% of patients were older than 65 years and 55% of patients were male. The majority (55%) of patients had primary myelofibrosis, 26% had post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis, and 19% had post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Sixteen percent of patients had intermediate-1 disease with symptoms, 49% had intermediate‑2 disease, and 35% had high-risk disease. Patients had a median palpable spleen length of 18 cm and a median spleen volume of 2,893.5 mL (range of 737 mL to 7,815 mL). The median duration of prior exposure to ruxolitinib was 10.7 months (range of 0.1 months to 62.4 months).

The study met its primary endpoint demonstrating a spleen response rate of 30.9% at the end of cycle 6 (40.2% at the end of cycle 3). These data suggest an early spleen response. The proportion of patients achieving a 50% or greater reduction in total symptom score from baseline to the end of cycle 6 was 26.7%. The median percent change in total symptom score at the end of cycle 6 was -44.3%, indicating an improvement of approximately 44% in myelofibrosis-related symptoms. Most patients in the MFSAF analysis population had a decrease in the total symptom score at the end of cycle 6. All key symptoms assessed showed an improvement at the end of cycle 6, with a median reduction of -22.2% in bone or muscle pain, -44.1% in itching, -46.2% in abdominal discomfort, -51.3% in early satiety, -76.0% in night sweats, and -83.3% in pain under ribs on left side. An exploratory analysis of the patients' responses to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) also showed a numerical improvement at the end of cycle 6 relative to baseline across global health status (mean improvement of +8.7). All functional domain scores for cognitive, emotional, physical, role, and social functioning showed respective mean improvements (+4.4, +4.2, +7.8, +9.1, and +7.2).

To confirm the robustness of the results from the single-arm JAKARTA-2 study, the sponsor conducted five supportive analyses for the primary endpoint using different methods and applying new, more stringent criteria for analysis populations. The intention-to-treat population consisted of 97 patients, while cohort 1 (n = 79) included patients who met newly defined criteria for patients with relapsed/refractory disease to ruxolitinib or patients intolerant to ruxolitinib. Cohort 1a (n = 66), a subgroup of cohort 1, included patients who had received cycle 6 of Inrebic treatment or who had discontinued Inrebic treatment for reasons other than "study terminated by sponsor". Results for cohort 1 and cohort 1a (spleen response rates of 30.4% and 36.4%, respectively) were consistent with the primary analysis results. Subgroup analyses consistently showed clinically significant improvements in the splenomegaly and myelofibrosis-associated symptoms, thus further supporting the overall robustness of the data. Assessments of long-term effects of Inrebic were limited due to early termination of the study. The median duration of exposure to Inrebic 400 mg was 24 weeks (range of 0.7 to 79.4 weeks).

Indication

The New Drug Submission for Inrebic was filed by the sponsor with the following indication:

  • Inrebic (fedratinib) is indicated for the treatment of splenomegaly and/or disease-related symptoms in adult patients with primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, including patients who have been previously exposed to ruxolitinib.

Health Canada revised the proposed indication to restrict the use of Inrebic only to patients with intermediate‑2 or high-risk myelofibrosis. Most patients (92%) in the clinical trials had intermediate‑2 or high-risk myelofibrosis. Moreover, the efficacy and safety of Inrebic have not been studied in patients with lower-risk categories of myelofibrosis. Accordingly, Health Canada approved the following indication:

  • Inrebic (fedratinib) is indicated for the treatment of splenomegaly and/or disease-related symptoms in adult patients with intermediate‑2 or high-risk primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, including patients who have been previously exposed to ruxolitinib.

For more information, refer to the Inrebic Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Safety

The safety of Inrebic was evaluated based on data from 608 patients receiving multiple doses of Inrebic in clinical trials, including patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms or solid tumours.

Serious cases of encephalopathy, including Wernicke's encephalopathy, a neurologic emergency resulting from thiamine (vitamin B1) deficiency, were reported in 1.3% (8/608) of the patients treated with Inrebic across clinical trials and 0.16% (1/608) of cases were fatal. Seven patients were taking Inrebic at a dose of 500 mg daily prior to the onset of neurologic findings and had predisposing factors such as gastrointestinal adverse events that could have led to thiamine deficiency. Most events resolved after Inrebic treatment cessation with some residual neurological symptoms including memory loss, cognitive impairment, and dizziness, except for one fatal outcome. Specific warnings, including a Serious Warnings and Precautions box are present in the Inrebic Product Monograph to highlight the risk of serious and fatal encephalopathy, including Wernicke's encephalopathy. The Inrebic Product Monograph contains recommendations for assessing thiamine levels in all patients prior to starting Inrebic, periodically during treatment, and as clinically indicated. It also warns that treatment with Inrebic should not be initiated in patients with thiamine deficiency.

During the clinical development of Inrebic, the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (mainly diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting), for which study protocols had no specific instructions. Furthermore, dosing instructions for the pivotal trials advised that Inrebic should be taken on an empty stomach. In a food effect study, healthy subjects taking Inrebic with a high-fat, high-calorie meal had fewer gastrointestinal adverse events than those taking the drug under fasted conditions or with a low-fat meal. Accordingly, the Inrebic Product Monograph includes recommendations for the prophylactic use of antiemetics and starting antidiarrheal treatment at the first onset of symptoms. In addition, to enhance tolerability, it is recommended that Inrebic should be given with food, preferably with a high-fat, high-calorie evening meal.

Safety data from a pooled cohort of 203 patients with myelofibrosis treated with the recommended clinical dose of Inrebic 400 mg daily, including 97 patients previously exposed to ruxolitinib, support the use of Inrebic in the target patient population. Among the 203 patients, the median duration of exposure was 35.6 weeks (range of 0.7 to 114.6 weeks). For 95 patients treated with placebo until disease progression, after which these patients were allowed to crossover to active treatment, the median duration of exposure to Inrebic was up to 24.0 weeks (or 6 cycles). The safety and tolerability of Inrebic observed in patients previously exposed to ruxolitinib were consistent with the results obtained in JAK2-inhibitor-naïve patients and, generally, adverse events were manageable with dose reductions or dose interruptions and appropriate supportive care.

The most frequent non-hematologic adverse drug reactions in patients treated with Inrebic were diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were the most frequent hematologic adverse reactions. The most frequent serious adverse events, regardless of causality, included pneumonia (4.4%), cardiac failure (3%), anemia (2.5%), atrial fibrillation, sepsis, pleural effusion, acute kidney injury, and diarrhea (1.5% each). Fatal adverse events not related to disease progression included cardiorespiratory arrest and sepsis (2 patients), cardiogenic shock, and hemorrhagic shock (in one patient, each).

Overall, 43.3% of patients treated with 400 mg of Inrebic developed grade 3 anemia, whereas no patients developed grade 4 anemia. Grade 3 and grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 14.3% and 8.9% of patients, respectively. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were managed with supportive treatment, dose reduction or dose interruption. Elevations of liver enzymes, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (51.7%) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (59.1%), were primarily grade 1 or 2 asymptomatic events. Grade 3 or 4 ALT, AST, and total bilirubin elevations occurred in 6.4% of patients and were generally reversible with dose modification or permanent treatment discontinuation.

Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the approved Inrebic Product Monograph to address the identified safety concerns.

For more information, refer to the Inrebic Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

 

 

 

7.2 Non-Clinical Basis for Decision

 

The non-clinical data support the use of Inrebic for the specified indication.

In cell models expressing mutationally active Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), fedratinib (the medicinal ingredient in Inrebic) reduced phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT3/5) proteins, inhibited cell proliferation, and induced apoptotic cell death. In mouse models of JAK2V617F-driven myeloproliferative disease, fedratinib blocked phosphorylation of STAT3/5, and improved survival and disease-associated signs (including white blood cell counts, hematocrit, splenomegaly, and fibrosis).

In safety pharmacology studies, fedratinib exhibited inhibitory activity on the human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) potassium channel current in vitro, with a half-maximal inhibition (IC50) value of 2.1 µM. In vivo, the central nervous, respiratory, and cardiovascular systems were unaffected by fedratinib treatment.

The toxicity and toxicokinetic profiles of fedratinib were characterized in mice, rats and dogs. In repeated dose toxicity studies, toxicity target organs of fedratinib included the bone marrow (hypoplasia) and liver (bile duct hypertrophy and necrosis, hepatocellular necrosis and degeneration, Kupffer cell hyperplasia, and cholestasis). Toxicity effects were also observed in the lymphoid tissues (atrophy of the thymus, spleen, and mesenteric lymph nodes; histiocytic infiltrates in mesenteric lymph nodes), lungs (histiocytic infiltration), skeletal muscle (necrosis), non-glandular stomach (edema and squamous cell hyperplasia), intestines (glandular atrophy), heart (increased incidence of cardiomyopathy), and male reproductive organs (aspermia, seminiferous tubule degeneration). Pneumonia and abscesses were also observed at lethal doses in dogs.

Toxicokinetic assessments in rats and dogs showed that fedratinib exposures, based on the area under plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC), were approximately 6 to 10 times lower than those reported in humans. This suggested that humans were not as sensitive as animals to the toxicities of fedratinib. Based on these results, toxicities reported in animals are considered to have limited relevance for humans.

In vitro, fedratinib was not genotoxic in a bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) assay and a chromosome aberration assay. In vivo, fedratinib did not exhibit genotoxic potential in a rat micronucleus assay. Additionally, fedratinib was not carcinogenic in the 6-month carcinogenicity study conducted in rasH2 transgenic mice.

In reproductive and developmental toxicity studies, fedratinib administered to pregnant rats at a dose of 10 mg/kg/day resulted in a decreased body weight gain during gestation. Adverse embryo-fetal effects included postimplantation loss, lower fetal body weights, and skeletal variations. The offspring had lower body weights both before and after weaning. In a fertility study, fedratinib had no effect on estrous cycle parameters, mating performance, fertility, pregnancy rate, or reproductive parameters in male or female rats at doses up to 30 mg/kg. In rabbits, no fedratinib-related maternal or developmental adverse findings were reported at oral doses up to 30 mg/kg/day. In both rats and rabbits, fedratinib exposures (AUC) were approximately 0.1 times the clinical exposure achieved with an oral dose of 400 mg of fedratinib.

The results of the non-clinical studies as well as the potential risks to humans have been included in the Inrebic Product Monograph. In view of the intended use of Inrebic, there are no pharmacological or toxicological issues within this submission to preclude authorization of the product.

For more information, refer to the Inrebic Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

 

 

7.3 Quality Basis for Decision

 

The chemistry and manufacturing information submitted for Inrebic has demonstrated that the drug substance and drug product can be consistently manufactured to meet the approved specifications. Proper development and validation studies were conducted, and adequate controls are in place for the commercial processes. Changes to the manufacturing process and formulation made throughout the pharmaceutical development are considered acceptable upon review. Based on the stability data submitted, the proposed shelf life of 48 months is acceptable when the drug product is stored at room temperature (15ºC to 30ºC).

Proposed limits of drug-related impurities are considered adequately qualified, i.e., within International Council for Harmonisation limits and/or qualified from toxicological studies.

The sites involved in production are compliant with Good Manufacturing Practices.

All non-medicinal ingredients (described earlier) found in the drug product are acceptable for use in drugs according to the Food and Drug Regulations. No excipients of human origin are used in the formulation of Inrebic. The only excipient of animal origin is the gelatin component of the capsule shell. Satisfactory information has been provided to establish that this excipient does not pose a risk of contamination with transmissible spongiform encephalopathy agents.