Summary Basis of Decision for Qulipta

Review decision

The Summary Basis of Decision explains why the product was approved for sale in Canada. The document includes regulatory, safety, effectiveness and quality (in terms of chemistry and manufacturing) considerations.


Product type:

Drug
Summary Basis of Decision (SBD)

Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) documents provide information related to the original authorization of a product. The SBD for Qulipta is located below.

Recent Activity for Qulipta

The SBDs written for eligible drugs approved after September 1, 2012 will be updated to include post-authorization information. This information will be compiled in a Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT). The PAAT will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada's decisions were negative or positive. The PAATs will be updated regularly with post-authorization activity throughout the product life cycle. At this time, no PAAT is available for Qulipta. When the PAAT for Qulipta becomes available, it will be incorporated into this SBD.

Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) for Qulipta

Date SBD issued: 2023-04-20

The following information relates to the new drug submission for Qulipta.

Atogepant

Therapeutic Area (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] Code): N02 Analgesics

Drug Identification Number (DIN):

DIN 02533979 – 10 mg atogepant, tablet, oral administration

DIN 02533987 – 30 mg atogepant, tablet, oral administration

DIN 02533995 – 60 mg atogepant, tablet, oral administration

Abbvie Corporation

Submission Type: New Drug Submission (New Active Substance)

New Drug Submission Control Number: 253186

Date Filed: 2021-05-28

Authorization Date: 2022-12-22

On December 22, 2022, Health Canada issued a Notice of Compliance to Abbvie Corporation for the drug product Qulipta.

The market authorization was based on quality (chemistry and manufacturing), non‑clinical (pharmacology and toxicology), and clinical (pharmacology, safety, and efficacy) information submitted. Based on Health Canada’s review, the benefit‑harm-uncertainty profile of Qulipta is favourable for the prevention of episodic migraine (<15 migraine days per month) in adults.

1 What was approved?

Qulipta, a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, was authorized for the prevention of episodic migraine (<15 migraine days per month) in adults.

The safety and efficacy of Qulipta in pediatric patients (less than 18 years of age) has not been studied, therefore Qulipta has not been approved in this patient population.

Clinical studies of Qulipta did not include a sufficient number of geriatric patients (65 years of age and over; 66 patients) to determine whether they respond differently compared to younger patients. In general, dose selection for an elderly patient should be done with caution, usually starting at the low end of the dosing range and maintained at the lowest effective dose. This approach reflects the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, or cardiac function, and of concomitant disease or other drug therapy.

Qulipta (10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg atogepant) is presented as a tablet. In addition to the medicinal ingredient, the tablet contains colloidal silicon dioxide, croscarmellose sodium, mannitol, microcrystalline cellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate copolymer, sodium chloride, sodium stearyl fumarate, and vitamin E polyethylene glycol succinate.

The use of Qulipta is contraindicated in patients who are hypersensitive to this drug or to any ingredient in the formulation, including any non‑medicinal ingredient, or component of the container.

The drug product was approved for use under the conditions stated in its Product Monograph taking into consideration the potential risks associated with its administration. The Qulipta Product Monograph is available through the Drug Product Database.

For more information about the rationale for Health Canada's decision, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

2 Why was Qulipta approved?

Health Canada considers that the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of Qulipta is favourable for the prevention of episodic migraine (<15 migraine days per month) in adults.

Migraine is a common disabling primary headache disorder manifesting as recurring severe headaches that are generally associated with nausea and light and/or sound sensitivity. Migraine has a prevalence of approximately 8% in Canada and occurs more commonly in women than in men by a 3:1 ratio.

Migraine attacks can vary in frequency, severity, and impact on an individual's quality of life. A number of options are currently available in Canada for the treatment of migraine, including triptans, dihydroergotamines, non‑steroidal anti‑inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and over‑the‑counter (OTC) analgesics. Barbiturates and opioid analgesics are also used off‑label. Patients who experience frequent attacks (typically, 4 or more attacks per month or 8 or more headache days per month) may benefit from a prophylactic approach. In Canada, topiramate is approved for migraine prophylaxis, while other drugs including valproic acid, and a number of antiepileptics and antidepressants are used off‑label. Additionally, 4 monoclonal antibodies are authorized for the prevention of episodic or chronic migraine.

Immediately prior to and during a migraine attack, cerebral nerves and blood vessels in the brain release substances including calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). This peptide is said to cause an inflammatory response and the subsequent pain that is associated with an attack. Qulipta (atogepant) is a new active substance belonging to the “gepants” class of drugs. Theoretically, since atogepant is a CGRP receptor antagonist, it may play a role in alleviating migraine pain by blocking CGRP from attaching to its receptors, thereby inhibiting the effect of CGRP. Limited data suggest that atogepant treatment may not lead to unwanted vascular events. However, since CGRP receptors do exist in the cardiovascular and gastrointestinal systems, adverse events related to both systems would not be unexpected. For example, CGRP is widely expressed in the gastrointestinal system. Activation of CGRP receptors in this system induces relaxation of smooth muscle cells, thereby contributing to the maintenance of normal intestinal motility, whereas blocking of CGRP receptors can potentially lead to slow transit in the gut and cause constipation.

The clinical efficacy of Qulipta was evaluated in two pivotal studies, 3101‑301‑002 and CGP‑MD‑01, conducted in adult patients with an average of 8 migraine days per month (range: 4 to 16 days). In both studies, patients were randomized to one of four groups to receive either placebo or Qulipta at 10 mg, 30 mg, or 60 mg once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint in both studies was the change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine days across the 12‑week treatment period. The key secondary endpoint in both studies was the change from baseline in monthly headache days across the 12‑week treatment period. A total of 316, 415, and 422 participants received at least one dose of Qulipta in the 10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg treatment groups, respectively, while 408 patients received placebo. In both studies, monthly migraine days and monthly headache days decreased across the 12-week treatment period by an average of approximately 1 to 1.5 days. These improvements are considered clinically meaningful.

In controlled studies, including the two pivotal studies, the most common treatment‑emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported in patients in the Qulipta treatment groups were nausea (7%; 3% in placebo groups), constipation (6%; 1% in placebo groups), and somnolence (3%; 1% in placebo groups). In cases of nausea, the frequency of adverse events was found to be dose‑dependent. Across the two studies, the completion rates were approximately 86% for Qulipta‑treated patients and 90% for patients in the placebo groups.

Approximately 3.5% of Qulipta-treated patients and 2.7% of patients in the placebo groups discontinued due to adverse events, most commonly due to nausea (6 participants or 0.5%; 0% in placebo groups) and constipation (5 participants or 0.4%; 0% in placebo groups). There were no deaths, life‑threatening adverse events, or safety signals in the pivotal studies.

The long‑term safety of Qulipta was assessed in a 52‑week open‑label study, in which 543 patients were treated with Qulipta 60 mg once daily. Overall, the safety profile of Qulipta in the long‑term safety study was similar to the safety profile observed in the pivotal studies.

A Risk Management Plan (RMP) for Qulipta was submitted by Abbvie Corporation to Health Canada. The RMP is designed to describe known and potential safety issues, to present the monitoring scheme and when needed, to describe measures that will be put in place to minimize risks associated with the product. Upon review, the RMP was considered to be acceptable.

The submitted inner and outer labels, package insert, and Patient Medication Information section of the Qulipta Product Monograph meet the necessary regulatory labelling, plain language and design element requirements.

The sponsor submitted a brand name assessment that included testing for look‑alike sound‑alike attributes. Upon review, the proposed name Qulipta was accepted.

Qulipta has an acceptable safety profile based on the non-clinical data and clinical studies. The identified safety issues can be managed through labelling and adequate monitoring. Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the Qulipta Product Monograph to address the identified safety concerns.

This New Drug Submission complies with the requirements of sections C.08.002 and C.08.005.1 and therefore Health Canada has issued the Notice of Compliance pursuant to section C.08.004 of the Food and Drug Regulations. For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

3 What steps led to the approval of Qulipta?

A Notice of Non‑compliance (NON) was issued for the New Drug Submission (NDS) for Qulipta due to concerns identified during the quality review, related to the manufacturing process. In response to the NON, the sponsor submitted data that resolved the identified concerns. A Notice of Compliance (NOC) was subsequently issued for the NDS for Qulipta.

The review of the NDS for Qulipta was based on a critical assessment of the data package submitted to Health Canada. The reviews completed by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were used as added references, as described in the Draft Guidance Document: The Use of Foreign Reviews by Health Canada. Method 1 was used in the clinical review, and various methods were used in the non‑clinical review. The Canadian regulatory decision on the Qulipta NDS was made independently based on the Canadian review.

For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Management of Drug Submissions and Applications Guidance.

Submission Milestones: Qulipta

Submission Milestone

Date

Pre-submission meeting

2021-02-25

New Drug Submission filed

2021-05-28

Screening 1

Screening Acceptance Letter issued

2021-07-15

Review 1

Review of Risk Management Plan completed

2022-04-04

Non-clinical evaluation completed

2022-05-05

Quality evaluation inactive

2022-05-09

Clinical/medical evaluation inactive

2022-05-09

Labelling review inactive

2022-05-09

Notice of Non-Compliance issued by Director General, Pharmaceutical Drugs Directorate (quality issues)

2022-05-10

Response to Notice of Non-Compliance filed

2022-07-08

Screening of Response to Notice of Non-Compliance (Screening 2)

Screening Acceptance Letter issued

2022-08-05

Review of Response to Notice of Non-Compliance (Review 2)

Review of Risk Management Plan completed

2022-12-05

Quality evaluation completed

2022-12-16

Labelling review completed

2022-12-20

Clinical/medical evaluation completed

2022-12-21

Notice of Compliance issued by Director General, Pharmaceutical Drugs Directorate

2022-12-22

4 What follow-up measures will the company take?

Requirements for post-market commitments are outlined in the Food and Drugs Act and Regulations.

5 What post-authorization activity has taken place for Qulipta?

Summary Basis of Decision documents (SBDs) for eligible drugs authorized after September 1, 2012 will include post-authorization information in a table format. The Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT) will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada's decisions were negative or positive. The PAAT will continue to be updated during the product life cycle.

At this time, no PAAT is available for Qulipta. When available, the PAAT will be incorporated into this SBD.

For the latest advisories, warnings and recalls for marketed products, see MedEffect Canada.

6 What other information is available about drugs?

Up-to-date information on drug products can be found at the following links:

7 What was the scientific rationale for Health Canada's decision?
7.1 Clinical Basis for Decision

As described above, the clinical review of the New Drug Submission for Qulipta was conducted as per Method 1 described in the Draft Guidance Document: The Use of Foreign Reviews by Health Canada.

Clinical Pharmacology

Atogepant, the medicinal ingredient in Qulipta, is a selective calcitonin gene‑related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist that blocks the binding of the CGRP to its receptor. Calcitonin gene‑related peptide is a neuropeptide that may play a role in migraine pathophysiology.

The major pharmacokinetic aspects of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of Qulipta have been well characterized in patients and healthy volunteers. Atogepant is rapidly absorbed following oral administration. Plasma concentrations greater than 14 nM were observed within 0.5 hours, and the median time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) ranged from 1.0 to 2.0 hours. Atogepant displayed dose‑proportional pharmacokinetics through 300 mg single dose, with little to no accumulation upon once‑daily dosing. Atogepant is metabolized primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. The most prevalent circulating components in human plasma were atogepant and a metabolite, M23, which is not expected to be pharmacologically active. The elimination half‑life of atogepant is approximately 11 hours. It is excreted predominantly via the biliary/fecal route (approximately 90%), while the renal route is a minor route of elimination (approximately 10%).

In patients with pre‑existing mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment (Child Pugh classes A, B, and C, respectively), atogepant exposure increased by 24%, 15%, and 38%, respectively. No dose adjustment is recommended for patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. The use of Qulipta in patients with severe hepatic impairment should be avoided.

The effects of renal impairment were evaluated through a population pharmacokinetic analysis based on pooled data from the clinical studies. Atogepant pharmacokinetics was similar between patients with normal renal function (creatinine clearance [CLcr] >90 mL/min) and those with mild (CLcr 60‑89 mL/min) or moderate (CLcr 30‑59 mL/min) renal impairment. Atogepant pharmacokinetics has not been studied in patients with severe renal impairment (CLcr 15‑29 mL/min) or end stage renal disease (ESRD; CLcr <15 mL/min). A physiologically‑based pharmacokinetic model predicted that atogepant exposures increase by approximately 2.3‑fold in patients with severe renal impairment. In patients with ESRD, atogepant exposure is not expected to increase more than 6-fold. Therefore, the maximum recommended daily dose of atogepant in patients with severe renal impairment and ESRD is 10 mg. For patients with ESRD undergoing intermittent dialysis, Qulipta should be taken after dialysis.

Overall, the clinical pharmacology data support the use of Qulipta for the recommended indication.

For further details, please refer to the Qulipta Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Efficacy

The clinical efficacy of Qulipta was evaluated in two pivotal studies, 3101‑301‑002 and CGP‑MD‑01, conducted in adult patients with an average of 8 migraine days per month (range: 4 to 16 days). Patients in Study CGP-MD-01 (Study 1) had a mean age of 42 years (range: 18 to 73 years), 89% were female, and 11% were male. Patients in Study 3101-301-002 (Study 2) had a mean age of 40 years (range: 18 to 74 years), 86% were female, and 14% were male.

In both studies, patients were randomized to one of four groups to receive either placebo or Qulipta at 10 mg, 30 mg, or 60 mg once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint in both studies was the change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine days across the 12‑week treatment period. Secondary endpoints in both studies included the change from baseline in monthly headache days across the 12‑week treatment period, the proportion of patients with at least a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days across the 12‑week treatment period (i.e., ≥50% responder rates), and the change from baseline in monthly acute medication use days across the 12‑week treatment period. A total of 316, 415, and 422 participants received at least one dose of atogepant in the 10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg treatment groups, respectively, while 408 patients received placebo.

In both studies, monthly migraine days and monthly headache days decreased across the 12-week treatment period by an average of approximately 1 to 1.5 days compared to placebo. These improvements are considered clinically meaningful. Decreases in monthly migraine and headache days were dose-dependent in Study 3101-301-002 but not in Study CGP-MD-01. In study 3101-301-002, secondary efficacy endpoints such as reduction of mean monthly headache days, ≥50% responder rates and reduction in monthly acute medication use days across the 12-week treatment period were all statistically significant across the 12-week treatment period compared to placebo. In study CGP-MD-01, these endpoints were numerically superior to placebo, but only reduction in mean monthly headache days reached statistical significance. Approximately 5% to 8% of patients who received Qulipta and 1% of patients in the placebo group had a 100% reduction in the 3‑month average of monthly migraine days.

Indication

Health Canada approved the following indication:

Qulipta (atogepant) is indicated for the prevention of episodic migraine (<15 migraine days per month) in adults.

For more information, refer to the Qulipta Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Safety

In controlled studies, including the two pivotal studies described in the Clinical Efficacy section, the most common treatment‑emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported in patients in the Qulipta treatment groups were nausea (7%; 3% in placebo groups), constipation (6%; 1% in placebo groups), and somnolence (3%; 1% in placebo groups). In cases of nausea, the frequency of adverse events was found to be dose‑dependent. Across the two studies, the completion rates were approximately 86% for Qulipta‑treated patients and 90% for patients in the placebo group.

Approximately 3.5% of Qulipta-treated patients and 2.7% of patients in the placebo groups discontinued due to adverse events. The most commonly reported events leading to discontinuation included nausea (6 participants or 0.5%; 0% in placebo groups) and constipation (5 participants or 0.4%; 0% in placebo groups). There were no deaths, life‑threatening adverse events, or safety signals in the pivotal studies.

The long‑term safety of Qulipta was assessed in a 52‑week open‑label study, in which 543 patients were treated with Qulipta 60 mg once daily. The most common TEAEs reported in this study included constipation (39 patients or 7.2%), nausea (34 patients or 6.3%), urinary tract infection (28 patients or 5.2%), and decreased weight (14 patients or 2.6%). This study had a much higher rate of discontinuations compared to the pivotal studies (32% vs 14%). In total, 31 patients (5.7%) discontinued due to adverse events including constipation (1 patient or 0.2%), nausea (3 patients or 0.6%), fatigue and dizziness (2 patients each or 0.4%), and decreased weight (1 patient or 0.2%). Overall, the safety profile of Qulipta in the long‑term safety study was similar to the safety profile observed in the pivotal studies.

For more information, refer to the Qulipta Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

7.2 Non-Clinical Basis for Decision

As described above, the review of the non-clinical component of the New Drug Submission for Qulipta was conducted using various methods described in the Draft Guidance Document: The Use of Foreign Reviews by Health Canada.

The repeated administration of atogepant was well tolerated in general toxicology studies. Oral administration at the highest doses was associated with non‑adverse epithelial vacuolation in the jejunum and duodenum, which was not accompanied by histopathological changes and/or functional impairment of the digestive tract. Reversibility of this finding was observed specifically in the 6‑month study in rats, which included a 1‑month recovery period. The no‑observed-adverse‑effect (NOAEL) in this study was 100 mg/kg/day, which represents an exposure multiple of approximately 33‑fold relative to the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD). In a 9‑month study in monkeys, the NOAEL was 300 mg/kg/day, representing an exposure multiple of 12‑fold relative to the MRHD.

No signs of genotoxicity were detected for atogepant in in vitro (Ames, chromosomal aberration) and in vivo (rat bone marrow micronucleus) assays. No evidence of carcinogenicity was detected in two‑year studies conducted in mice and rats. No signs of phototoxicity were identified in the skin or eyes.

No adverse effects were observed on fertility or reproductive performance following the oral administration of atogepant to male and female rats (mated with drug‑naïve females and males, respectively), at doses corresponding to approximately 20 times the MRHD.

Oral administration of atogepant (0, 5, 15, 125, or 750 mg/kg/day) to pregnant rats during the period of organogenesis resulted in decreased fetal body weight. Additionally, an increased incidence of fetal skeletal variations was observed at 125 mg/kg/day and 750 mg/kg/day. Neither of these effects were associated with maternal toxicity. At the NOAEL for embryo‑fetal toxicity in rats (15 mg/kg/day), the exposure of atogepant as measured by the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was approximately 5 times higher than the exposure in humans at the MRHD of 60 mg/day.

Slight maternal toxicity was noted at the highest dose of atogepant administered to pregnant rabbits (130 mg/kg/day), with fetal visceral and skeletal variations. The NOAEL was 90 mg/kg/day, which is approximately 3 times the MRHD. In rats, no adverse effects were observed on development at doses up to 125 mg/kg/day (approximately 5 times the exposure in humans at the MRHD as measured by the AUC). Maternal transfer to the pups via lactation was demonstrated by a milk to plasma ratio of 2‑ to 3‑fold.

Breastfeeding mothers should be informed of the potential transfer of the drug via the milk and the risk to their infants, as well as risk during pregnancy. This information should be considered along with the therapeutic benefits of the drug product. As part of their pharmacovigilance activities, the sponsor is expected to establish and maintain a Pregnancy Registry to monitor any post-market use of the drug by pregnant women.

No toxicologically meaningful changes were observed on cardiovascular, respiratory, or nervous system function in safety pharmacology studies. There was no evidence for abuse in self-administration and withdrawal studies in rats.

The results of the non-clinical studies as well as the potential risks to humans have been included in the Qulipta Product Monograph. Considering the intended use of Qulipta, there are no pharmacological or toxicological issues within this submission which preclude authorization of the product.

For more information, refer to the Qulipta Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

7.3 Quality Basis for Decision

A Notice of Non‑compliance (NON) was issued for the New Drug Submission (NDS) for Qulipta due to concerns identified during the quality review, related to the manufacturing process. In response to the NON, the sponsor submitted data that resolved the identified concerns. A Notice of Compliance (NOC) was subsequently issued for the NDS for Qulipta.

The chemistry and manufacturing information submitted for Qulipta has demonstrated that the drug substance and drug product can be consistently manufactured to meet the approved specifications. Proper development and validation studies were conducted, and adequate controls are in place for the commercial processes. Changes to the manufacturing process and formulation made throughout the pharmaceutical development are considered acceptable upon review. Based on the stability data submitted, the proposed shelf life of 30 months is acceptable when the drug product is stored at room temperature (15 ºC to 30 ºC).

Proposed limits of drug-related impurities are considered adequately qualified (i.e., within International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use [ICH] limits and/or qualified from toxicological studies).

All sites involved in production are compliant with good manufacturing practices.

None of the non-medicinal ingredients (excipients, described earlier) found in the drug product are prohibited by the Food and Drug Regulations.

None of the excipients used in the formulation of Qulipta is of human or animal origin.