Summary Basis of Decision for Baraclude
Review decision
The Summary Basis of Decision explains why the product was approved for sale in Canada. The document includes regulatory, safety, effectiveness and quality (in terms of chemistry and manufacturing) considerations.
Product type:
Baraclude
Entecavir, Tablets - 0.5 mg
Solution - 0.05 mg/mL, Tablets, Solution, Oral
Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada
Submission control no: 102555
Date issued: 2007-01-02
Health Products and Food Branch
Our mission is to help the people of Canada maintain and improve their health.
Health Canada
HPFB's Mandate is to take an integrated approach to the management of the risks and benefits to health related to health products and food by:
- Minimizing health risk factors to Canadians while maximizing the safety provided by the regulatory system for health products and food; and,
- Promoting conditions that enable Canadians to make healthy choices and providing information so that they can make informed decisions about their health.
Health Products and Food Branch
Également disponible en français sous le titre : Sommaire des motifs de décision (SMD), BARACLUDE*, Entécavir, 0.5 mg comprimés, 0,05 mg/mL solution, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, N° de contrôle de la présentation 102555
Foreword
Health Canada's Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) documents outline the scientific and regulatory considerations that factor into Health Canada regulatory decisions related to drugs and medical devices. SBDs are written in technical language for stakeholders interested in product-specific Health Canada decisions, and are a direct reflection of observations detailed within the evaluation reports. As such, SBDs are intended to complement and not duplicate information provided within the Product Monograph.
Readers are encouraged to consult the 'Reader's Guide to the Summary Basis of Decision - Drugs' to assist with interpretation of terms and acronyms referred to herein. In addition, a brief overview of the drug submission review process is provided in the Fact Sheet entitled 'How Drugs are Reviewed in Canada'. This Fact Sheet describes the factors considered by Health Canada during the review and authorization process of a drug submission. Readers should also consult the 'Summary Basis of Decision Initiative - Frequently Asked Questions' document.
The SBD reflects the information available to Health Canada regulators at the time a decision has been rendered. Subsequent submissions reviewed for additional uses will not be captured under Phase I of the SBD implementation strategy. For up-to-date information on a particular product, readers should refer to the most recent Product Monograph for a product. Health Canada provides information related to post-market warnings or advisories as a result of adverse events (AE).
For further information on a particular product, readers may also access websites of other regulatory jurisdictions. The information received in support of a Canadian drug submission may not be identical to that received by other jurisdictions.
Other Policies and Guidance
Readers should consult the Health Canada website for other drug policies and guidance documents. In particular, readers may wish to refer to the 'Management of Drug Submissions Guidance'.
1 Product and submission information
Brand name:
Manufacturer/sponsor:
Medicinal ingredient:
International non-proprietary Name:
Strength:
Solution - 0.05 mg/mL
Dosage form:
Route of administration:
Drug identification number(DIN):
- 02282224 - 0.5 mg tablets
- 02282232 - 0.05 mg/mL solution
Therapeutic Classification:
Non-medicinal ingredients:
Oral Solution: citric acid, maltitol, methylparaben, orange flavour, propylparaben, sodium citrate
Submission type and control no:
Date of Submission:
Date of authorization:
2 Notice of decision
On June 16, 2006 , Health Canada issued a Notice of Compliance to Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada for the drug product Baraclude.
Baraclude contains the medicinal ingredient entecavir which is a guanosine nucleoside analogue.
Baraclude is indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in adults with evidence of active viral replication and either evidence of persistent elevations in serum aminotransferases (ALT or AST) or histologically active disease. Baraclude has been shown to be an effective antiviral drug for the treatment of chronic HBV. The medicinal ingredient entecavir is phosphorylated to the active triphosphate form which exhibits selective activity against HBV polymerase, competes with the natural substrate deoxyguanosine triphosphate, and inhibits functional activities of the HBV polymerase.
Priority Review Status was granted for the evaluation of Baraclude as it appeared to provide a significant increase in efficacy for a serious, life-threatening, or severely debilitating illness not adequately managed by a drug marketed in Canada . Results presented suggested greater efficacy than existing treatments as well as effectiveness in patients whose virus is resistant to lamivudine, which represents an increasingly significant proportion of chronic HBV sufferers.
The market authorization was based on submitted data from quality control studies, preclinical, and clinical studies. Clinical efficacy and safety were studied in three pivotal active-controlled trials that included 1633 patients with chronic HBV infection accompanied by evidence of viral replication. Subjects had persistently elevated ALT levels (≥1.3 times the upper limit of normal) and chronic inflammation on liver biopsy compatible with a diagnosis of chronic viral hepatitis. The safety and efficacy were also evaluated in a study of 68 patients co-infected with HBV and HIV. All trials compared entecavir to an active control lamivudine. Entecavir was clearly efficacious and exhibited superiority to lamivudine.
Baraclude (entecavir) is presented in tablets (0.5 mg) and oral solution (0.05 mg/mL). The usual recommended dose of Baraclude for chronic HBV infection in adults and adolescents 16 years of age or older is 0.5 mg once daily. For adults and adolescents 16 years of age or older with a history of hepatitis B viremia while receiving lamivudine or with known lamivudine resistance mutations, the recommended dose of Baraclude is 1 mg (two 0.5 mg tablets) once daily. Dosing guidelines are available in the Product Monograph.
Baraclude is contraindicated in patients with a previously demonstrated hypersensitivity to entecavir or any component of the product. Baraclude should be administered under the conditions stated in the Product Monograph taking into consideration the potential risks associated with the administration of this drug product. Detailed conditions for the use of Baraclude are described in the Product Monograph.
Based on the Health Canada review of data on quality, safety, and effectiveness, Health Canada considers that the benefit/risk profile of Baraclude is favourable for the treatment of chronic HBV infection in adults with evidence of active viral replication and either evidence of persistent elevations in serum aminotransferases (ALT or AST) or histologically active disease.
3 Scientific and Regulatory Basis for Decision
3.1 Quality Basis for Decision
3.1.1 Drug Substance (Medicinal Ingredient)
Manufacturing Process and Process Controls
The drug substance, entecavir, is synthetically derived . Materials used in the manufacture of the drug substance are considered suitable and meet the standards appropriate for their intended use. Each step of the manufacturing process is considered to be controlled within acceptable limits.
Characterisation
Entecavir possesses three chiral centers and therefore eight stereoisomers are possible, however high stereochemical control is achieved in the synthesis of the drug substance. The desired polymorph is consistently produced by the commercial synthesis.
Impurities and degradation products arising from manufacturing and/or storage were reported and characterized . The proposed limits are considered satisfactorily qualified; i.e., within the ICH established limits and/or qualified from toxicological studies, and are therefore considered acceptable.
Control of Drug Substance
Quality control testing is conducted on each lot of entecavir prior to being formulated into the drug product. Copies of the analytical methods and where appropriate, validation reports were considered satisfactory for all analytical procedures used for release and stability testing of the drug substance.
Data from the batch analyses were reviewed and were within the proposed acceptance criteria.
The proposed packaging components are considered acceptable.
Stability
Based upon the real-time and accelerated stability study data submitted, the proposed re-test, storage, and shipping conditions for the drug substance were supported and considered to be satisfactory.
3.1.2 Drug Product
Description and Composition
Baraclude (entecavir) is formulated as a 0.5 mg tablet and a 0.05 mg/mL oral solution.
The 0.5 mg film-coated tablets are white to off-white triangular-shaped tablets, debossed with "BMS" on one side and "1611" on the other side. The tablets are compressed from a granulation containing entecavir, lactose monohydrate, microcrystalline cellulose, crospovidone, povidone, and magnesium stearate. The tablet coating contains titanium dioxide, hypromellose, polyethylene glycol 400, and polysorbate 80. The tablets (in quantities of 30 or 90) are packaged in high-density polypropylene (HDPE) bottles with child-resistant closures.
The 0.05 mg/mL oral solution is an orange-flavoured, clear, colourless to pale yellow aqueous solution. The solution contains entecavir, methylparaben, propylparaben, orange flavour, citric acid anhydrous, maltitol solution, and sodium citrate. Sodium hydroxide or hydrochloric acid may be added to adjust the pH. The solution (210 mL) is contained in 260 mL HDPE bottles with child-resistant closures. A 10 mL graduated dosing spoon is provided with the bottle.
All excipients found in the drug product are acceptable for use in drugs according to the Food and Drug Regulations. The compatibility of entecavir with the excipients is demonstrated by the stability data presented on the proposed commercial formulation.
Pharmaceutical Development
Changes to the manufacturing process and formulation made throughout the development of the tablet and the oral solution were considered acceptable upon review.
Manufacturing Process and Process Controls
The tablets are manufactured using a wet granulation process. The three major processing steps are: granulation, compression, and coating. The oral solution is formulated, filtered, filled, and labelled. The specifications for all of the ingredients (except the orange flavour) are either approved in accordance with USP/NF or Ph. Eur. standards. All equipment, operating parameters, in-process tests, and detailed instructions are adequately defined in the documentation. The manufacturing process is considered to be adequately controlled within justified limits.
Control of Drug Product
The test specifications and analytical methods are considered acceptable. The validation study demonstrated that the manufacturing process consistently yields product meeting the pre-determined specifications and quality attributes.
Copies of the analytical methods and where appropriate, validation reports for analytical procedures were provided. Validation data for analytical procedures were considered satisfactory for release and stability testing of the drug product.
Data from batch analyses were reviewed and are considered to be acceptable according to the specification of the drug product.
Stability
The stability results remained within specifications under both ICH long-term and ICH accelerated storage conditions. No trends or failures were observed in this data.
The stability results are supportive of the following storage conditions:
- The tablets when packaged in HDPE bottles with child-resistant closures have a shelf-life of 24 months when stored at 25°C with excursions permitted between 15-30°C.
- The oral solution when packaged in HDPE bottles with child-resistant closures and stored in the outer carton has a shelf-life of 24 months when protected from light at 25°C with excursions permitted between 15-30°C.
3.1.3 Facilities and Equipment
The design, operations and controls of the facilities and equipment that are involved in the production are considered suitable for the activities and products manufactured. All of the proposed manufacturing sites comply with the requirements of Division 2 of the Food and Drug Regulations.
3.1.4 Adventitious Agents Safety Evaluation
The tablets contain two excipients that can be of animal origin: magnesium stearate and lactose monohydrate. Certificates have been obtained from the manufacturers of both ingredients to verify their compliance with the recommended procedures to control transmission of agents of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). These products are considered to be safe for human use.
The oral solution contains no materials that are derived from cell lines of human or animal origin.
3.1.5 Summary and Conclusion
This New Drug Submission is considered to meet the requirements of Division C.08.002 of the Food and Drug Regulations insofar as the Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) information is concerned. The Chemistry and Manufacturing information submitted for Baraclude has demonstrated that the drug substance and the drug products can be consistently manufactured to meet the specifications agreed upon. Proper development and validation studies were conducted, and adequate controls are in place for the commercial processes.
3.2 Non-Clinical Basis for Decision
3.2.1 Pharmacodynamics
The pharmacology program consisted of in vitro and in vivo studies to examine the pharmacodynamics of entecavir.
In vitro studies demonstrated that entecavir is a potent, selective inhibitor of HBV. Entecavir (ETV) is efficiently phosphorylated to entecavir-triphosphate (ETV-TP) by cellular nucleoside kinases. By competing directly with the natural deoxyguanosine triphosphate (dGTP), ETV-TP potently inhibits all three functional activities of the HBV polymerase (priming, reverse transcription and DNA-dependent DNA synthesis). ETV-TP had little effect on the DNA polymerases; activity against cellular polymerases is unlikely at clinically relevant concentrations.
In vivo studies showed entecavir to be effective and well tolerated in the woodchuck model for chronic HBV infection. A long-term study with entecavir in woodchuck hepatitis virus (WHV) infected animals indicated that after an initial daily dosing period of 8 weeks, viral replication was suppressed for up to 3 years with only a weekly maintenance dosing regimen. Viral DNA levels were decreased more than 7 logs and significant reductions in levels of covalently closed circular DNA (a key replicative intermediate) were observed. Survival rates for animals treated for 14 or 36 months were 40% and 80% at the end of the prolonged monitoring period, respectively, compared to only 4% for historical controls. Compared to historical data, the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in these animals was reduced markedly and no emergence of WHV resistant substitutions was observed during the prolonged treatment period.
Entecavir was also tested in vivo and in vitro for anti-hepadnaviral activity in ducklings and in duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) infected hepatocytes. Entecavir was shown to be >1000 fold more potent than lamivudine in DHBV infected hepatocytes, had superior potency, and was well tolerated in the duckling DHBV model.
Effects of entecavir on vital functions including the cardiovascular, respiratory, and central nervous system were studied in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro studies and the in vivo study performed in anesthetized dogs were in accordance to the ICH Guidelines 7B (May 2005) for assessing the potential of entecavir to delay ventricular repolarization. Based on the results of the battery of in vivo and in vitro safety pharmacology studies, there is minimal potential for unwanted pharmacologic effects including unwanted cardiac electrophysiological effects in humans receiving entecavir. Combination studies of HIV nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors with entecavir showed no antagonistic effects on HBV or HIV antiviral activities in vitro.
3.2.2 Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
Entecavir was rapidly absorbed in many species including rats, dog, mice, woodchucks, rabbits, and ducks following oral administration. The bioavailability of entecavir was high in rats and dogs but was low in monkeys. The rate of absorption was also slower in monkeys relative to rats and dogs. The low bioavailability in monkeys was due to poor absorption and not related to first-pass metabolism.
Dose-related increases in systemic exposure to entecavir were observed in all species. In rats, drug exposure was higher in males than in females. This difference between the sexes was species-specific and was attributable to the greater production of the major metabolite m2 in female rats compared to male rats.
The terminal phase plasma half-life of entecavir following IV administration ranged from approximately 2-9 hours in selected species. Systemic accumulation of entecavir was not observed after repeated administration in rats and monkeys. Low to moderate accumulation was observed in dogs (1.1-2.5 fold increase). In humans the systemic accumulation ratio of entecavir was similar and ranged from 1.6-2.7 in the dose range of 0.1-1.0 mg/day.
Distribution
In vitro , the serum protein binding levels of entecavir were low in mouse, rat, dog, monkey and human (ranging from 7.9%-24%) and entecavir was uniformly distributed between plasma and the red blood cells in human blood. Values for the steady state volume of distribution in rats, dogs, and monkeys were greater than the volume of total body water in these species suggesting extravascular distribution of the drug and/or preferential binding in tissues. Tissue distribution studies in mice and rats indicated that entecavir was rapidly and extensively distributed throughout the body, including the liver which is the intended site of action. Drug-related radioactivity was widely distributed in maternal and foetal tissues of pregnant rats as well, and was secreted in the milk of lactating rats. Low concentrations of entecavir were found in the cerebrospinal fluid of mice, rats, dogs and monkeys indicating that entecavir can cross the blood brain barrier.
Metabolism
In vitro entecavir is not a substrate, inhibitor, or inducer of the human cytochrome P450 isoenzymes at concentrations up to 10 μM (approximately 340 times higher than the maximum concentration observed in humans following multiple daily doses of 1.0 mg). Consistent with this finding, no oxidative metabolism was detected in any of the in vivo studies. Only Phase II (conjugation reactions) metabolites (glucuronide and sulfate) of entecavir were found in rats, dogs, monkeys and humans. All of the circulating metabolites identified in humans were also present in rats, dogs and monkeys. The total amount of metabolites as a percentage of the total radioactivity in urine or faeces was low in all species indicating that metabolic clearance does not play a major role in entecavir elimination.
Excretion
Entecavir is eliminated mainly as unchanged drug in the urine in animals (rats, dogs and monkeys) and humans. Biliary excretion was not a major route of elimination.
Overall, the ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) profiles of entecavir in mice, rats, dogs and monkeys compared to humans suggest that these species were appropriate for the safety assessment of entecavir and its metabolites.
3.2.3 Toxicology
The pivotal toxicology studies supporting the safety of entecavir were appropriately designed and conducted in compliance with Good Laboratory Practices. The monohydrate of entecavir was used in all studies; therefore, all doses or concentrations used are expressed in terms of entecavir free base.
Acute Toxicity
In single-dose studies in mice and rats, oral doses up to 200 mg/kg were well tolerated and doses ≥1000 mg/kg were overtly toxic.
Long-Term Toxicity
Long-term toxicology studies were ≥6 months in duration (3 months for dogs). The long-term studies are more relevant for entecavir as this drug is anticipated to be administered daily for ≥1 year. The principal target organs/tissues in these studies were the central nervous system (CNS), kidney, liver, lung, skeletal muscle, and testes.
CNS
CNS inflammation was observed at doses ≥0.3 mg/kg in a 3-month dog study. This was not associated with overt signs of CNS toxicity. In a second 3-month study in dogs, a dose of 0.1 mg/kg was demonstrated to be a no-effect dose for all drug-related changes (exposure 23 and 13 times higher than in humans at doses of 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg dose, respectively). At the highest dose tested in the second study (15 mg/kg), the CNS changes were found to be reversible following a 3-month post-dose period. CNS inflammation was not observed in the other species evaluated in the toxicology studies. Based on this and the fact that the CNS changes occurred at exposures >23 times that in humans suggest that the CNS findings in dogs are not relevant to human safety.
Kidney
Kidney changes (spontaneous nephropathy in mice, and renal tubular degeneration in dogs) were observed only at overtly toxic doses in the 6- and 3- month studies, respectively. At the no-effect doses for kidney changes in mice (5 mg/kg) and dogs (3 mg/kg), entecavir exposure was ≥46 and ≥458 times higher than that in humans, respectively. Nephrotoxicity was not reported in clinical trials with entecavir. The lack of nephrotoxicity in the clinical trials along with the fact that the kidney changes in animals occurred only at overtly toxic doses in 2 out of the 4 species tested suggest that the kidney is not a target organ in humans.
Liver
In mice and rats, centrilobular degeneration in the liver (without associated increases in serum transaminases) was observed at doses ≥0.2 mg/kg and 0.02 mg/kg, respectively. Mitochondrial enlargement was associated with this finding in rats at doses ≥0.6 mg/kg; however it was considered to be a non-specific reaction to the liver degeneration as it lacked the characteristics of hepatocellular megamitochondria observed with fialuridine, and entecavir was not shown to have any direct effects on mitochondria. Liver degeneration was not observed in dogs (even at overtly toxic doses) or monkeys at exposures to entecavir that were higher than those associated with liver changes in rodents. Therefore, entecavir -induced liver degeneration appears to be a rodent-specific finding.
Lung
In mice, alveolar histiocytosis was observed in the lungs at doses ≥ 1.0 mg/kg and bronchioloalveolar hyperplasia and benign lung adenomas were observed at doses ≥10 mg/kg. In mice, the no-effect dose for lung changes (0.2 mg/kg) was 22 times the exposure in humans at the 0.5 mg dose (12 times at the 1.0 mg dose). The lung changes appeared to be species-specific as no similar changes were observed in rats, dogs or monkeys.
Skeletal Muscle
Skeletal muscle myopathy occurred in mice at doses ≥1.0 mg/kg and in rats at doses ≥0.6 mg/kg in the 6-month studies. Exposure to entecavir at the no-effect doses for these findings were ≥4 times the exposure in humans at the 1.0 mg dose. The skeletal muscle myopathy appears to be specific to rodents and is unlikely to be relevant to human safety.
Testes
In both rats and mice, decreased weight of the testes was observed at doses ≥5.0 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg, respectively. In mice, seminiferous tubular degeneration was observed only at the overtly toxic doses of 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg. An increased incidence of seminiferous tubular degeneration was noted at the 1.4 mg/kg dose in the carcinogenicity study in rats. These changes did not affect the reproductive function in male rats as demonstrated in the reproductive study. Exposure to entecavir at this dose was ≥35 times the exposure in humans at the 1.0 mg dose. In dogs, decreased weight of the testes was observed at the 0.3 mg/kg dose and seminiferous-tubular degeneration was observed at doses ≥3 mg/kg, both of which were non-overtly toxic doses. At 3 mg/kg, the threshold dose for microscopic changes in the testes of dogs, exposure to entacavir was 813 times higher than that in humans at the 0.5 mg dose and 458 times higher at the 1 mg dose. In addition, these changes showed evidence of reversibility at 15 mg/kg following a 3-month post-dose period. Therefore, the testis is not a likely target organ in humans administered entecavir.
Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity
In rats, e ntecavir demonstrated no selective developmental toxicity, no effects on reproductive function or fertility, and no adverse findings in a perinatal/postnatal study at exposures ≥28 times that in humans at the1.0 mg dose daily. In rabbits, entecavir caused embryo-foetal toxicity at 16 mg/kg without producing maternal toxicity; therefore entecavir caused selective developmental toxicity in rabbits. The exposure to entecavir at this dose was ≥883 times the exposure to humans taking the 1.0 mg dose. Statistically significant increases in the average number of ossified ribs (13th rib) occurred at all doses. The sponsor states that this is not drug-related at the lower doses (1.0 mg/kg and 4.0 mg/kg), because there is considerable variability within control populations and this was the only foetal finding at the lower doses. At the no-effect dose, exposure to entecavir was approximately 210 times higher than that in humans at the 1.0 mg dose. Overall, adequate safety margins relative to the exposures in humans were evident for entecavir.
Genetic Toxicity
Entecavir was not mutagenic in the Ames assay or in a mammalian-cell forward gene mutation assay. Entecavir was not clastogenic in an oral micronucleus study in rats. In addition, entecavir was not mutagenic in an oral DNA repair study in rats and it did not increase the frequency of morphologically transformed colonies with Syrian hamster embryo cells. However, in an in vitro chromosome aberration assay in primary human lymphocytes, entecavir was clastogenic at ≥10 μg/mL (36 μM). This was not unexpected as all marketed antiviral nucleoside analogues show clastogenic activity in in vitro and/or in vivo assays. It was postulated that deoxynucleotide-triphosphate (dNTP) pool imbalances were a potential mechanism for clastogenicity. The concentrations required for dNTP imbalances and clastogenicity are in the micromolar range whereas therapeutic concentrations in humans are in the low nanomolar range, suggesting an unlikely risk to humans.
Carcinogenicity
Positive carcinogenic results were observed in the two-year carcinogenicity studies conducted in mice and rats. E ntecavir was associated with an increased incidence of benign and malignant neoplasms involving a variety of organ sites. Of particular concern, because of the low equivalence to human exposure, was the development of lung adenomas in male mice at exposures three times that in humans at the 1.0 mg dose. It is postulated that the lung tumours are species-specific, since a key event in tumour development, pneumocyte proliferation, was not observed in rats, dogs or monkeys. In addition, the chemotactic effect of entecavir on the recruitment of macrophages, which leads to the sustained proliferation of Type II pneumocytes, was not observed in a human monocytic cell line. The Product Monograph identifies this potential hazard and includes detailed information on the results of the carcinogenicity studies.
3.2.4 Summary and Conclusion
Based on the pre-clinical data, entecavir is a potent and selective inhibitor of chronic HBV infection. E ntecavir was shown to be very effective in two common animal models for chronic hepatitis B virus: woodchucks chronically infected with woodchuck hepatitis virus and ducks infected with duck hepatitis B virus.
The non-clinical toxicity profile of entecavir , characterized in an extensive battery of invitro and in vivo studies including carcinogenicity studies in rats and mice, supports the clinical use of entecavir. The pivotal toxicology studies supporting the safety of entecavir were appropriately designed and conducted in compliance with Good Laboratory Practices.
The positive results of the rodent carcinogenicity testing were not judged to warrant a black box warning considering their uncertain clinical significance and the levels of entecavir exposure involved. However, the results are prominently displayed in the product label immediately following the black box warnings.
The sponsor has submitted a Pharmacovigilance Plan which outlines additional measures to further characterize and monitor the theoretical cancer risk in humans. This includes a postmarketing commitment to the US FDA to conduct a large simple safety study of entecavir in order to assess the major outcomes of death, progression of liver disease, and cancer in a large population of chronic HBV patients. The proposed study protocol describes an observational study with a target enrolment of 12,500 subjects, randomized 1:1 to receive entecavir or another nucleoside/tide analogue with the subjects followed for 5-8 years.
Based on a risk/benefit assessment, it was found that there are no non-clinical pharmacology and toxicology issues which would preclude the market authorization of Baraclude.
3.3 Clinical basis for decision
3.3.1 Pharmacodynamics
The pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of entecavir were evaluated in subjects chronically infected with HBV. The best PD model was the change in the viral load as a function of time, best described by a direct inhibitory maximum effect (Emax), where the dose of entecavir and the value of the steady state drug exposure (AUC) were associated with a greater reduction of HBV DNA. According to this model, there was no association between increased entecavir exposure and the severity of adverse events regardless of which PK parameter (AUC, Cmax or dose) was evaluated.The confidence interval of 67% to 150% was selected which suggests that a 33% decrease or 50% increase in entecavir exposure is not expected to impact clinical outcome with respect to safety and efficacy. Creatinine clearance was the only covariate which resulted in a significant inter-individual variability in the clearance of entecavir.
3.3.2 Pharmacokinetics
Comparable bioavailability studies were conducted to demonstrate that the rate and extent of absorption of entecavir from the 0.5 mg tablets are similar to the rate and extent of absorption of entecavir from the 0.5 mg/mL oral solution.
The PK parameters of entecavir were characterized in a series of Phase I studies, which examined the exposure of single or multiple, oral doses of entecavir ranging from 0.05-40.0 mg in healthy subjects in the US , China , and Japan.
Absorption
Entecavir is absorbed rapidly with peak plasma levels occurring within 0.5-1.5 hours of drug administration. Steady state is achieved approximately 6-10 days after the start of once-daily dosing and there is an approximate 2-fold accumulation of entecavir exposure upon multiple dosing. At the therapeutic relevant doses of 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg, the steady state Cmax values were 4.2 ng/mL and 8.2 ng/mL, respectively, and the Cmin values were 0.3 ng/mL and 0.5 ng/mL, respectively.
The effect of food on the oral availability of entecavir was assessed in two studies. Regardless of the fat content, the absorption of entecavir was significantly decreased when co-administered with a meal as compared to fasting conditions. These studies support the recommendation that entecavir should be administered under fasting conditions defined as two hours after the last meal and two hours before the next meal.
Distribution
The estimated bioavailability of entecavir was ≥70%, suggesting that entecavir is extensively distributed into the tissues. Entecavir plasma concentrations decreased in a bi-exponential manner with a terminal half-life of 128-149 hours, and an effective accumulation half-life of approximately 24 hours.
Metabolism
Metabolism of entecavir was minimal. Approximately 10% of the administered entecavir was metabolized to glucuronide conjugates in the plasma and a sulphate conjugate in faeces. No oxidative metabolites of entecavir were detected in vivo.
In vitro studies with primary or established human cells examined the potential of entecavir to inhibit or induce enzymes in the cytochrome P450 family and to interact with P-glycoprotein. Based on the in vitro data presented, it is unlikely that entecavir is an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 enzymes at concentrations up to 300 µM or an inducer of cytochrome P450 enzymes at concentrations up to 10 µM. The in vitro permeability of human Caco-2 cells (which mimic small intestinal epithelial cells) to 35 µM entecavir was very low indicating entecavir is not a substrate for the P-glycoprotein.
Elimination
Renal elimination was the major route of excretion. Entecavir is eliminated primarily as unchanged drug in the urine.
Drug-Drug Interaction Studies
The drug-drug interaction studies examined the potential of entecavir to interact with three antiviral nucleoside/nucleotide analogues: lamivudine, adefovir or tenofovir, all of which are also excreted by renal elimination. The PK profile at steady state was unaltered for each drug when co-administered with entecavir as compared to its corresponding profile when administered alone. This indicates that there were no interactions between entecavir and lamivudine, adefovir or tenofovir at the level of plasma PKs.
Prior treatment with lamivudine was found to be an important determinant for the response to entecavir. This supports the use of a higher dose of entecavir in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant individuals.
Special Populations
Age and Gender - Exposure to entecavir was increased in the elderly and this was attributable to decreased renal function observed with increasing age. No significant gender-related differences were noted in the PKs of entecavir.
Hepatic Impairment - No statistically significant differences were reported between the PK values in healthy subjects and hepatically impaired patients. Therefore, dose adjustments are not required in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment.
Renal Impairment - Mild to severe renal impairment, including renal disease requiring dialysis, significantly increased the exposure to entecavir as compared to patients with normal renal function. Hemodialysis removed approximately 13% of entecavir in patients with severe renal impairment. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis did not play a role in the elimination of entecavir. Dose adjustment of entecavir is warranted when administered to patients with renal impairment.
HIV and HBV Co-Infected Patients - A Phase II study of the efficacy and safety of entecavir was undertaken in HIV and HBV co-infected patients who had Hepatitis B viremia while on lamivudine treatment as part of a highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen. A 24-week treatment with a once-daily dose of 1.0 mg entecavir was found to be safe and effective at reducing HBV DNA as compared to placebo. No subjects developed a confirmed HIV virologic rebound in either the entecavir or the placebo group.
Safety Issues
No major safety issues were identified in the Phase I and Phase II Clinical Pharmacology studies. The PK characteristics of entecavir support a once-daily dosing regimen for entecavir.
3.3.3 Clinical Efficacy
Four studies were submitted to support the efficacy of entecavir, including three pivotal Phase III studies (AI463022, AI463026, and AI463027) and one Phase II study (AI463014). The three pivotal studies included 1633 subjects who were 16 years of age or older with chronic HBV infection accompanied by evidence of viral replication. Subjects had persistently elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and chronic inflammation on liver biopsy compatible with the diagnosis of chronic viral hepatitis. All of the studies compared entecavir to the active control lamivudine. Studies AI463022 and AI463027 evaluated entecavir in nucleoside-naïve subjects who were HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative, respectively. Study AI463026 examined entecavir in lamivudine-refractory HBeAg-positive subjects. In the Phase 2 lamivudine-refractory study AI463014, approximately one-third of the subjects were HBeAg-positive. The efficacy was measured by 1) histology (the primary efficacy endpoint); 2) virologic response (decrease in HBV DNA); 3) biochemical response (normalization of ALT); and 4) serologic response (loss of HBeAg +/- appearance of HBe Ab).
Entecavir demonstrated efficacy against HBV in chronically infected subjects with evidence of ongoing viral replication and hepatic inflammation. The response to entecavir was superior to lamivudine based on histologic, virologic and biochemical parameters. The studies were not sufficiently powered to establish serologic superiority.
Superiority of entecavir was consistent in both HBeAg positive and negative subjects. Virologic efficacy, in particular, was substantial in nucleoside-naïve subjects. Mean changes in HBV DNA at 48 weeks were -6.98 log10 copies/mL in HBeAg+ subjects and -5.20 log10 copies/mL in HBeAg- subjects.
The efficacy of entecavir was reduced in lamivudine-refractory subjects (subjects displaying viremia while on lamivudine) compared to nucleoside-naïve subjects, regardless of the endpoint examined. The superiority of entecavir to lamivudine was more marked in the lamivudine-refractory subjects compared to naïve subjects, however this would be expected given that the comparator was a failing treatment regimen.
No genotypic changes associated with entecavir resistance (ETVR) were seen in nucleoside-naïve subjects (without LVDR HBv at baseline) after 48 weeks of entecavir treatment, including the 1 subject displaying virologic rebound.
In contrast to the nucleoside-naïve studies, entecavir resistance was observed in the lamivudine-refractory subjects. In Study AI263026 baseline genotyping revealed pre-existing ETVR substitutions at a rate of 7%, demonstrating selection due to previous lamivudine treatment. Also evident was the reduced genetic barrier to the appearance of new ETVR substitutions, with an additional 8% of ETV-treated subjects developing ETVR substitutions after 48 weeks of treatment. At this time, a virologic rebound occurred in 1 subject (1%). After 96 weeks of treatment, the rate of virologic rebound was 9%.
3.3.4 Clinical Safety
The three pivotal Phase III studies (AI463022, AI463026, and AI463027) and the one Phase II study (AI463014) (described in section 3.3.3 Clinical Efficacy) provided the safety data, supplemented by an analysis of a larger population from a total of ten studies for the purpose of assessing "infrequent events" (e.g. carcinogenicity).
Safety was assessed in a total of 1720 subjects including 862 subjects with a mean exposure to entecavir of just over one year. Entecavir displayed a favourable overall safety profile that was very similar to the comparator drug lamivudine which is widely used and generally recognized as well tolerated. The most common treatment-related side effects seen were headache, fatigue, dizziness, and nausea, all occurring in less than 10% of the subjects. Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred at a rate of <1% and were those that would be expected in subjects with chronic HBV infection, including elevations of ALT and hepatic malignancies. Entecavir-treated subjects discontinued treatment at a rate of 1-2%. Deaths occurred in <1% of the subjects. The deaths were considered unrelated or not-likely related to the study drug by the investigators, and were consistent with chronic HBV infection or co-morbid disease.
Lactic acidosis was not observed in any of the clinical studies. However, since entecavir is a nucleoside analogue, existing class labelling regarding this possible risk is included in the product labelling.
Carcinogenicity is a particular safety concern with entecavir as there were positive rodent carcinogenicity findings observed in the pre-clinical studies. The exact clinical significance of the rodent carcinogenicity findings is unknown.
In an attempt to assess risk of carcinogenicity and other infrequent events, safety data was pooled from 10 studies. The resulting database consisted of data for 2399 subjects: 1392 subjects exposed to any dose of entecavir, 899 subjects exposed to lamivudine 100 mg, and 108 placebo subjects of whom 105 later received open-label entecavir. The mean time on therapy for the entecavir-treated subjects was 57 weeks, with 24% receiving entecavir for ≥ 1.5 years.
Analysis based on the extended database revealed 17 cases of malignant neoplasms in the entecavir (ETV) group compared to 9 in the lamivudine (LVD) group, or a 1.1% rate per subject for the ETV group compared to a 1.0% rate per subject for the LVD group. Expressed as a rate per 1000 Patient-Years (PY) of observation, the results translate to 8.5 per 1000 PY for the ETV group and 7.8 per 1000 PY for the LVD group. When an analysis was conducted specifically for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 7 cases were reported in the ETV group versus 4 in the lamivudine group, yielding rates of ETV 0.5% per subject compared to LVD 0.4% per subject, and 3.5 per 1000 PY for ETV versus 3.4 per 1000 PY for LVD.
The clinical significance of the carcinogenicity findings remains uncertain. This safety concern is reflected in the Product Monograph and labelling; both adequately display the rodent carcinogenicity findings. The Product Monograph prominently displays the findings in the Warnings and Precautions section.
Postmarket Experience
A Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) for Baraclude (entecavir tablets and oral solution) was submitted, for the time period March 29, 2005 to September 28, 2005 . During this time, Baraclude was marketed in two countries including the United States . The total number of patients exposed to marketed Baraclude over this time period was approximately 667 patients.
A total of 23 adverse events (AEs) were included in the PSUR, all classified as serious. Seventeen SAEs were reported from clinical trials and 6 were spontaneous reports from worldwide sources. No new major findings were reported. AEs reported included leukopenia, pericardial effusion, pancreatitis, drug tolerance (3 cases), hepatic failure/ hepatorenal syndrome, hepatitis B, arthralgia, muscle spasms, myalgia, renal impairment, angioneurotic edema, liver transplant, bleeding varices/decreased platelet count, overdose, and increases of ALT (11 cases).
As a postmarketing commitment to the US FDA, the sponsor has agreed to a large, simple, safety study of entecavir in a large population (target enrolment 12,500) of chronic HBV patients. Study endpoints will be occurrence of malignancies (HCC and non-HCC), overall mortality, and HBV disease progression. It is anticipated that the sample size will provide a >80% power to detect a relative risk of at least 1.4 for non-HCC malignancies.
3.4 Benefit/Risk Assessment and Recommendation
3.4.1 Benefit/Risk Assessment
A Priority Review was granted for Baraclude based on summarized r esults suggesting that entecavir displayed a greater efficacy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B than existing treatments, specifically lamivudine. The data also indicated that entecavir was effective against the lamivudine-resistant virus. Thus it was felt that entecavir potentially offered a significant increase in efficacy in the treatment of a serious, life-threatening, or severely debilitating illness not adequately managed by a drug marketed in Canada . The pivotal studies in this submission demonstrate the superiority of entecavir to lamivudine in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, based on histologic, virologic, and biochemical measures over 48 weeks of treatment. Entecavir was superior in both HBeAg positive and negative subjects. In addition to its substantial antiviral efficacy, entecavir was notable for the lack of detectable ETVR substitutions in entecavir-treated nucleoside-naïve subjects at Week 48. In the lamivudine-refractory population, the efficacy of entecavir 1.0 mg was reduced compared to the nucleoside-naïve population. Unlike lamivudine and adefovir, entecavir demonstrated no activity against HIV. This offers a potential advantage when treating HBV-HIV co-infected patients by avoiding the selection of HIV strains resistant to these or related drugs, thereby preserving them as a future therapeutic option.
Entecavir displayed a favourable overall safety profile that was very similar to the comparator drug lamivudine which is widely used and generally recognized as well tolerated. In the animal studies, the exact clinical significance of the rodent carcinogenicity findings is unknown. A number of nucleoside and nucleotide analogue antivirals currently in use have been positive in animal carcinogenicity testing, including ganciclovir, zidovudine, abacavir and cidofovir. Also, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and some HIV protease inhibitors, such as ritonavir, have had positive results in carcinogenicity testing.
Historically in the case of HIV drugs, the consequences of untreated HIV were usually judged to far outweigh the potential risk of cancer. The same rationale was applied with ganciclovir when it was approved for treatment of serious cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections despite positive animal carcinogenicity findings.
Considering the evidence supporting the substantial efficacy of entecavir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, a serious condition for which treatment options are limited, the benefits of entecavir seem to outweigh its possible risks. In particular, for a number of parameters entecavir may well represent the most effective anti-HBV treatment to date, and the lack of development of resistance after 48+ weeks in treatment-naïve subjects is particularly promising. With respect to safety, other than the rodent carcinogenicity findings which are of uncertain clinical significance, entecavir is well tolerated and displays a favourable safety profile, comparable to the existing standard therapy (lamivudine).
3.4.2 Recommendation
Based on the Health Canada review of data on quality, safety and effectiveness, Health Canada considers that the benefit/risk profile of Baraclude is favourable in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in adults with evidence of active viral replication and either evidence of persistent elevations in serum aminotransferases (ALT or AST) or histologically active disease. The New Drug Submission complies with the requirements of sections C.08.002 and C.08.005.1 and therefore Health Canada has granted the Notice of Compliance pursuant to section C.08.004 of the Food and Drug Regulations.
4 Submission Milestones
Submission Milestones: Baraclude
| Submission Milestone | Date |
|---|---|
| Submission filed : | 2005-11-10 |
| Screening 1 | |
| Screening Acceptance Letter issued : | 2005-12-19 |
| Review 1 | |
| Biopharmaceutics Evaluation complete : | 2006-06-14 |
| Quality Evaluation complete : | 2006-06-14 |
| Clinical Evaluation complete : | 2006-06-15 |
| Labelling Review complete : | 2006-06-16 |
| NOC issued by Director General : | 2006-06-16 |
Related Drug Products
| Product name | DIN | Company name | Active ingredient(s) & strength |
|---|---|---|---|
| BARACLUDE | 02282224 | BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CANADA | ENTECAVIR 0.5 MG |