Summary Basis of Decision for Augtyro

Review decision

The Summary Basis of Decision explains why the product was approved for sale in Canada. The document includes regulatory, safety, effectiveness and quality (in terms of chemistry and manufacturing) considerations.


Product type:

Drug
Summary Basis of Decision (SBD)

Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) documents provide information related to the original authorization of a product. The SBD for Augtyro is located below.

Recent Activity for Augtyro

The SBDs written for eligible drugs (as outlined in Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision [SBD] Project: Phase II) approved after September 1, 2012 will be updated to include post-authorization information. This information will be compiled in a Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT). The PAAT will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada's decisions were negative or positive. The PAATs will be updated regularly with post-authorization activity throughout the product life cycle. At this time, no PAAT is available for Augtyro. When the PAAT for Augtyro becomes available, it will be incorporated into this SBD.

Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) for Augtyro

Date SBD issued: 2025-06-27

The following information relates to the New Drug Submission for Augtyro.

Repotrectinib

Drug Identification Number (DIN):

  • DIN 02557444 - 40 mg repotrectinib, capsule, oral administration

  • DIN 02557452 - 160 mg repotrectinib, capsule, oral administration

Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada

New Drug Submission Control Number: 284373

Submission Type: New Drug Submission (New Active Substance)

Therapeutic Area (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] Classification, second level): L01 Antineoplastic agents

Date Filed: 2024-02-28

Authorization Date: 2025-05-07

On May 7, 2025, Health Canada issued a Notice of Compliance to Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada for the drug product Augtyro. The market authorization of Augtyro was based on quality (chemistry and manufacturing), non‑clinical (pharmacology and toxicology), and clinical (pharmacology, safety, and efficacy) information submitted. Based on Health Canada’s review, the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of Augtyro is favourable for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

1 What was approved?

Augtyro, an antineoplastic agent, was authorized for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Augtyro is not authorized for use in pediatric patients (less than 18 years of age), as no clinical safety or efficacy data are available for this population.

No overall differences in safety and efficacy were reported between elderly patients (65 years of age and older) and younger patients (less than 65 years of age).

Augtyro (40 mg and 160 mg repotrectinib) is presented as a capsule. In addition to the medicinal ingredient, the capsule contains colloidal silicon dioxide, croscarmellose sodium, FD&C Blue No.1 (160 mg only), FD&C Blue No.2 aluminum lake (40 mg only), gelatin, magnesium stearate (160 mg only), microcrystalline cellulose, shellac, sodium lauryl sulfate, and titanium dioxide.

The use of Augtyro is contraindicated in patients who are hypersensitive to this drug or to any ingredient in the formulation, including any non-medicinal ingredient, or component of the container.

The drug product was approved for use under the conditions stated in its Product Monograph taking into consideration the potential risks associated with its administration. The Product Monograph for Augtyro is available through the Drug Product Database.

For more information about the rationale for Health Canada's decision, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

2 Why was Augtyro approved?

Health Canada considers that the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of Augtyro is favourable for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

In Canada, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death, with an estimated 32,100 new cases and 20,700 deaths in 2024, representing approximately 23% of all cancer deaths. Non-small cell lung cancer is the most common type of lung cancer, accounting for 85% of all lung cancers. The majority of patients with advanced NSCLC harbour a driver mutation (i.e., Kirsten rat sarcoma virus [KRAS], proto-oncogene B-Raf [BRAF], epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR], mesenchymal epithelial transition [MET], Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 [ERBB2]) or gene rearrangement (i.e., anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK], neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase [NTRK], rearranged during transfection [RET], ROS1), which can be targeted for treatment and have the possibility of improved outcomes compared to chemotherapy. As such, the treatment paradigm for advanced or metastatic NSCLC has evolved from chemotherapy as a standard of care to targeted therapies in the first line.

Non-small cell lung cancer with a ROS1 gene rearrangement accounts for approximately 1% to 2% of patients with lung cancer. Clinically, ROS1-positive rearrangement in NSCLC is indicative of a more aggressive and life-threatening disease with poor prognosis, as approximately 85% of ROS1-positive NSCLC patients initially present with stage IV disease and 20% to 40% have brain metastases. Moreover, the brain is one of the first and most frequent sites of disease progression (i.e., brain metastases) in patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Patients who are ROS1 positive tend to be younger than the average lung cancer patient and have little or no smoking history. This disease is more prevalent in females than in males.

As a first-line treatment, proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS1 (ROS1)-targeted therapy is recommended for the treatment of ROS1-positive NSCLC. In Canada, available ROS1-targeted therapies for locally advance or metastatic ROS1-positive NSCLC include crizotinib and entrectinib, if crizotinib was not previously used. Despite effective ROS1-targeted therapy in the first-line treatment, brain metastases and the development of acquired resistance mutations that eventually lead to disease progression represent common mechanisms of treatment failure to current ROS1 TKIs. Currently, there is no approved targeted therapy options available for patients who progress while on crizotinib or entrectinib.

Augtyro is an inhibitor of ROS1, ALK, tropomyosin receptor tyrosine kinase (TRK)A, TRKB, and TRKC. Augtyro was designed to bind inside the boundary of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding pocket and potentially avoid steric interference from both solvent front and gatekeeper mutations The recommended dosage is 160 mg orally once daily for 14 days, then increase to 160 mg twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The primary evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of Augtyro in patients with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1-positive NSCLC was provided in TRIDENT-1, a Phase I/II, multicentre, single-arm, open-label, multi-cohort study. The efficacy evaluation was based primarily on a prespecified pooled analysis set of 71 ROS1-positive TKI-naïve patients (8 from Phase I and 63 from Phase II) who received up to 1 prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy and 56 patients (3 from Phase I and 53 from Phase II) who received 1 prior ROS1 TKI treatment with no prior platinum-based chemotherapy or immunotherapy, who were followed for at least 14 months from the first dose. Patients from Phase I received Augtyro at various doses (range: 40 mg orally once daily to 200 mg twice daily), while patients from Phase II received Augtyro 160 mg orally once daily for 14 days, then increased to 160 mg twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary efficacy endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), with key secondary endpoints of duration of response (DOR) and intracranial response, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) and as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR).

Treatment with Augtyro resulted in a clinically and durable meaningful benefit in adult TKI-naïve and ROS1 TKI-pretreated patients with advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC. In TKI-naïve patients, the ORR was 78.9% (56 out of 71 patients; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 67.6, 87.7), including 7 complete responses and 49 partial responses. The median DOR was 34.1 months (95% CI: 25.6, not estimable). The efficacy benefit was consistent between patients with or without prior chemotherapy. In TKI-pretreated patients, the ORR was 37.5% (21 out of 56 patients; 95% CI: 24.9, 51.5), including 3 complete responses and 18 partial responses. The median DOR was 14.8 months (95% CI: 7.6, not estimable). Among patients who had measurable central nervous system metastases at baseline, responses in intracranial lesions were observed in 8 of 9 TKI-naïve patients and in 5 of 13 TKI-pretreated patients. The benefit of Augtyro treatment was also generally consistent across the prespecified subgroups, including prior TKI treatment and in patients with resistance mutations.

The overall safety profile of Augtyro was evaluated in 426 patients from TRIDENT-1 (320 patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC and 106 patients with other solid tumours harbouring a ROS1, ALK, or NTRK gene alteration) who received Augtyro at the recommended clinical dose of 160 mg twice daily. Most patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and 35% of patients experienced a serious adverse event with the most common (occurring in 2% or more of patients) characterized as pneumonia (6.3%), dyspnea (3.1%), pleural effusion (2.8%), and hypoxia (2.6%). The clinically significant TEAEs that were identified in the full safety population included central nervous system effects (77%; dizziness [65%], ataxia [28%], cognitive impairment [25%], mood disorders [6%], and sleep disorders [18%]), peripheral neuropathy (49%), hepatotoxicity (increased aspartate aminotransferase [41%] and alanine transaminase [38%]), myalgia (13%), vision disorders (12%), hyperuricemia (5%), interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (3.1%), and skeletal fractures (2.3%).

The most common (occurring in 10% or more of patients) TEAEs reported in ROS1-positive NSCLC patients were dizziness (64%), dysgeusia (52%), peripheral neuropathy (50%), constipation (37%), dyspnea (30%), ataxia (28%), fatigue (26%), cognitive disorder (24%), muscular weakness (22%), headache (19%), nausea (18%), cough (17%), increased weight (16%), edema (15%), diarrhea (13%), myalgia (12%), vision disorders (11%), and pneumonia (10%).

Overall, there was a low incidence of Grade 3 to 4 events. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mainly managed with Augtyro dose interruption and/or standard medical practice, specifically, 50% of patients required a dose interruption, 38% required a dose reduction, and 7% required permanent drug discontinuation.

A Risk Management Plan (RMP) for Augtyro was submitted by Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada to Health Canada. The RMP is designed to describe known and potential safety issues, to present the monitoring scheme, and when needed, to describe measures that will be put in place to minimize risks associated with the product. Upon review, the RMP was considered to be acceptable.

The submitted inner and outer labels, package insert, and Patient Medication Information section of the Product Monograph for Augtyro met the necessary regulatory labelling, plain language, and design element requirements.

The sponsor submitted a brand name assessment that included testing for look‑alike sound‑alike attributes. Upon review, the proposed name Augtyro was accepted.

Overall, Augtyro has been shown to have a favourable benefit-harm-uncertainty profile based on non-clinical and clinical studies. The identified safety issues can be managed through labelling and monitoring. Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the Product Monograph for Augtyro to address the identified safety concerns.

This New Drug Submission complies with the requirements of sections C.08.002 and C.08.005.1 and therefore Health Canada has issued the Notice of Compliance pursuant to section C.08.004 of the Food and Drug Regulations. For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

3 What steps led to the approval of Augtyro?

The sponsor filed a request for Priority Review Status under the Priority Review of Drug Submissions Policy for the review of the New Drug Submission (NDS) for Augtyro. An assessment was conducted to determine if sufficient evidence was provided demonstrating that the drug provides effective treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a serious, life-threatening, or severely debilitating disease or condition. The efficacy results obtained from the pivotal study did not provide a significant increase in efficacy and/or significant decrease in risk such that the overall benefit/risk profile is improved over existing therapies, preventatives, or diagnostic agents for a disease or condition that is not adequately managed by a drug marketed in Canada. For this reason, it was determined that the submission did not meet the criteria for Priority Review and therefore the request was denied. The submission was subsequently filed and reviewed as a regular NDS.

The NDS for Augtyro was reviewed under Project Orbis, an initiative of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Oncology Center of Excellence. The project is an international partnership designed to give cancer patients faster access to promising cancer treatments. The NDS for Augtyro was classified as a Project Orbis Type C submission. For this NDS, Health Canada collaborated with the FDA, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) of Australia, and the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic) of Switzerland. The Canadian regulatory decision on the Augtyro NDS was made independently based a critical assessment of the data package submitted to Health Canada.

As per Method 3 described in the Draft Guidance Document: The Use of Foreign Reviews by Health Canada, the review of the non-clinical and clinical components of the NDS for Augtyro was based on a critical assessment of the non-clinical and clinical review conducted by the FDA. Several methods for the use of the foreign reviews conducted by FDA were applied during Health Canada’s review of the quality and comparative bioavailability components of the submission. The Canadian regulatory decision on the Augtyro NDS was made independently based on the Canadian review.

The NDS included a pediatric development plan as part of Health Canada’s Pilot on pediatric development plans and studies. However, during review, the sponsor withdrew from the pilot.

For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Guidance Document: The Management of Drug Submissions and Applications.

Submission Milestones: Augtyro

Submission Milestone

Date

Pre-submission meeting

2023-09-20

Request for priority status filed

2023-12-20

Request for priority status rejected

2024-01-18

New Drug Submission filed

2024-02-28

Screening

Screening Deficiency Notice issued

2024-04-09

Response to Screening Deficiency Notice filed

2024-05-06

Screening Acceptance Letter issued

2024-05-28

Review

5 requests were granted to pause review clock (extensions to respond to clarification requests)

48 days in total

Biopharmaceutics evaluation completed

2025-01-31

Review of Risk Management Plan completed

2025-02-26

Labelling review completed

2025-04-02

Biostatistics evaluation completed

2025-04-08

Quality evaluation completed

2025-04-29

Non-clinical evaluation completed

2025-05-06

Clinical/medical evaluation completed

2025-05-06

Notice of Compliance issued by Director General, Pharmaceutical Drugs Directorate

2025-05-07

4 What follow-up measures will the company take?

Requirements for post-market commitments are outlined in the Food and Drugs Act and Food and Drug Regulations.

5 What post-authorization activity has taken place for Augtyro?

Summary Basis of Decision documents (SBDs) for eligible drugs (as outlined in Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision [SBD] Project: Phase II) authorized after September 1, 2012 will include post-authorization information in a table format. The Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT) will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada’s decisions were negative or positive. The PAAT will continue to be updated during the product life cycle.

At this time, no PAAT is available for Augtyro. When available, the PAAT will be incorporated into this SBD.

For the latest advisories, warnings and recalls for marketed products, see MedEffect Canada.

6 What other information is available about drugs?

Up-to-date information on drug products can be found at the following links:

7 What was the scientific rationale for Health Canada’s decision?

Refer to the What steps led to the approval of Augtyro? section for more information about the review process for this submission.

7.1 Clinical Basis for Decision

Clinical Pharmacology

Repotrectinib is an inhibitor of proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS1 (ROS1), the enzyme encoded by ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1). It is also an inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), tropomyosin receptor tyrosine kinase (TRK)A, TRKB, and TRKC. Fusion proteins that include ROS1 kinase domains can drive tumourigenic potential through hyperactivation of downstream signaling pathways, leading to unconstrained cell proliferation. Repotrectinib has demonstrated anti-tumour activity in cell lines expressing the targeted fusion oncogenes ROS1 and corresponding solvent front mutations ROS1G2032R and ROS1D2033N and gatekeeper mutation ROS1L2026M. Repotrectinib binds inside the boundary of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding pocket and avoids steric interference from both solvent front and gatekeeper mutations.

The recommended dosage of Augtyro is 160 mg orally once daily for 14 days, then increase to 160 mg twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Following the administration of repotrectinib 160 mg twice daily, the steady state geometric mean (coefficient of variation %) of the maximum serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) were 713 ng/mL (32.5%) and 7,210 ng•h/mL (40.1%), respectively.

Clinical drug interaction studies showed that repotrectinib interacts with midazolam, (a sensitive cytochrome P450 [CYP] 3A4 substrate), and that itraconazole (a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor and P-glycoprotein [P-gp] inhibitor) and rifampin (a strong CYP3A4 inducer) significantly increased and decreased repotrectinib exposure, respectively. It is recommended to avoid co-administration of repotrectinib with CYP3A inducers, CYP3A/P-gp inhibitors, and CYP3A substrates.

The updated population-based pharmacokinetic model did not identify clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of repotrectinib based on race, age (12 years to 93 years of age), gender, genetic alteration, prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor status, body weight, or hepatic/renal impairment.

For further details, please refer to the Product Monograph for Augtyro, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Efficacy

The clinical efficacy of Augtyro was evaluated in TRIDENT-1, a Phase I/II, multicentre, single-arm, open-label, multi-cohort study. Eligible patients were required to have ROS1-positive locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or less, measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), and 14 or more months of follow-up from the first dose. All patients were assessed for central nervous system lesions at baseline and patients with symptomatic brain metastases were excluded from the study. Patients from Phase I received Augtyro at various doses (range 40 mg orally once daily to 200 mg twice daily), while patients from Phase II received Augtyro 160 mg orally once daily for 14 days, then increased to 160 mg twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The efficacy evaluation was based primarily on a prespecified pooled analysis set of 71 ROS1-positive tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naïve patients (8 from Phase I and 63 from Phase II) who received up to 1 prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy and 56 patients (3 from Phase I and 53 from Phase II) who received 1 prior ROS1 TKI with no prior platinum-based chemotherapy or immunotherapy, who were followed for at least 14 months from the first dose.

Demographics and baseline disease were representative of the disease. In the TKI-naïve group, the mean age was 55.5 years, 60.6% were female, 67.6% were Asian, 1.4% were Black or African American, 1.4% were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 25.4% were White, 4.2% were not reported, 4.2% were Hispanic or Latino, 66.2% had an ECOG performance status of 1, and 33.8% had an ECOG performance status of 0. In the TKI-pretreated group, the mean age was 55.9 years, 67.9% were female, 48.2% were Asian, 1.8% were Black or African American, 1.8% were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 44.6% were White, 1.8% were not reported, 1.8% were unknown, 1.8% were Hispanic or Latino, 67.9% had an ECOG performance status of 1, and 32.1% had an ECOG performance status of 0.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), according to RECIST v1.1 and assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). The key secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR) and intracranial response, according to RECIST v1.1 and assessed by BICR.

Treatment with Augtyro resulted in a clinically meaningful ORR in both TKI-naïve and TKI-pretreated locally advanced or metastatic ROS1-positive NSCLC. The ORR was 78.9% (56 out of 71 patients; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 67.6, 87.7) in TKI-naïve patients, including 7 complete responses and 49 partial responses. The efficacy benefit was consistent between patients with or without prior chemotherapy. The ORR was 37.5% (21 out of 56 patients; 95% CI: 24.9, 51.5) in TKI-pretreated patients, including 3 complete responses and 18 partial responses.

Durable responses were observed with an estimated median DOR of 34.1 months (95% CI: 25.6, not estimable) in TKI-naïve patients and 14.8 months (95% CI: 7.6, not estimable) in TKI-pretreated patients.

The benefit of Augtyro treatment was also generally consistent across the prespecified subgroups, including prior TKI treatments and patients with resistance mutations.

Consistent efficacy results were observed in patients pretreated with crizotinib (ORR of 36.5 %; 85 patients) and entrectinib (ORR of 37.5 %; 16 patients), suggesting an Augtyro benefit regardless of the type of prior TKI therapy.

The central nervous system is a common site of metastases in patients with advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC, and is one of the first and most frequent sites of disease progression in patients treated with TKI. If untreated, it’s associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, demonstrating the intracranial activity of Augtyro is important to establish the clinical benefit of the drug. Despite the limited number of patients in TRIDENT-1, Augtyro showed intracranial activity in patients with measurable brain metastases at baseline by BICR, with an intracranial ORR of 88.9% (8 out of 9 patients) in TKI-naïve patients and an intracranial ORR of 38.5% (5 out of 13 patients) in TKI-pretreated patients, consistent with the overall ORR in both TKI-naïve and TKI-pretreated patients.

Several potential fusion gene partners for ROS1 have been observed in the clinic setting. Fusion proteins that include ROS1 kinase domains can drive tumourigenic potential through the hyperactivation of downstream signaling pathways, leading to unconstrained cell proliferation. Responses to treatment with Augtyro were observed regardless of ROS1 fusion partner.

Overall, the results from the TRIDENT-1 study demonstrated a clinical meaningful efficacy benefit with durable responses for Augtyro in adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1-positive NSCLC in the ROS1 TKI-naïve and ROS1 TKI-pretreated populations. The efficacy data remains favourable in the context of historic benchmark data for existing approved therapies in the naïve setting (i.e., crizotinib and entrectinib) and in the TKI-pretreated setting where there is currently no approved targeted therapies. The magnitude of the clinical benefit was generally consistently observed in all prespecified subgroups, although, there are still uncertainties that remain regarding the intracranial efficacy of Augtyro and its ability to overcome resistance mutations.

Indication

The New Drug Submission for Augtyro was filed by the sponsor with the following proposed indication, which Health Canada subsequently approved:

Augtyro (repotrectinib capsules) is indicated for:

  • Treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

For more information, refer to the Product Monograph for Augtyro, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Safety

The clinical safety of Augtyro was evaluated in TRIDENT-1, a Phase I/II, multicentre, single-arm, open-label, multi-cohort study described in the Clinical Efficacy section. The clinical safety package included an additional 6 months of follow-up since the original clinical study report (median follow-up of 15.6 months; 75 additional patients). The full safety population from TRIDENT-1 included 426 patients (416 patients in Phase II and 10 patients in Phase I) who received at least one dose Augtyro at the recommended clinical dose of 160 mg twice daily, regardless of tumour type or genetic rearrangement. Within this population, 320 patients had ROS1-positive NSCLC and 106 patients had other solid tumours harbouring a ROS1, ALK, or neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene alteration.

Patient demographics and disease characteristics for ROS1-positive NSCLC patients were representative of this population. The median age of patients was 55 years, the majority of patients were between 18 to 64 years of age and female, over 40% of patients were white or Asian, and 3% were Black. Most patients were able to escalate from 160 mg once a day to the recommended clinical regimen of 160 mg twice a day. Additionally, 48% of patients were exposed for at least 6 months and 28% were exposed for greater than 1 year.

There were no clinically relevant differences in the safety profile of Augtyro between ROS1-positive NSCLC patients and patients with other solid tumours harbouring a ROS1, ALK or NTRK gene alteration. Overall, serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 35% of patients in the full safety population, with the most common (occurring in 2% or more of patients) characterized as pneumonia (6.3%), dyspnea (3.1%), pleural effusion (2.8%), and hypoxia (2.6%). Fatal adverse events were observed in 3.5% of patients. There were no overt safety signals for SAEs or Augtyro-related fatal events; these events were confounded by prior medical history, concomitant medication, existent risk factors and/or overall expected in patients with advanced cancer.

The clinically significant TEAEs that were identified in the full safety population included central nervous system effects (77%; dizziness [65%], ataxia [28%], cognitive impairment [25%], mood disorders [6%], and sleep disorders [18%]), peripheral neuropathy (49%), hepatotoxicity (increased aspartate aminotransferase [41%] and alanine transaminase [38%]), myalgia (13%), vision disorders (12%), hyperuricemia (5%), interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (3.1%), and skeletal fractures (2.3%). The most common (occurring in 10% or more of patients) TEAEs reported in ROS1-positive NSCLC patients were dizziness (64%), dysgeusia (52%), peripheral neuropathy (50%), constipation (37%), dyspnea (30%), ataxia (28%), fatigue (26%), cognitive disorder (24%), muscular weakness (22%), headache (19%), nausea (18%), cough (17%), increased weight (16%), edema (15%), diarrhea (13%), myalgia (12%), vision disorders (11%), and pneumonia (10%).

Overall, there was a low incidence of Grade 3 to 4 events. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mainly managed with Augtyro dose interruption and/or standard medical practice, specifically, 50% of patients required a dose interruption, 38% required a dose reduction, and 7% required permanent drug discontinuation

The cardiac safety report concluded that Augtyro does not cause a mean increase in the QTc interval greater than 20 milliseconds at the recommended clinical dose of 160 mg twice daily.

Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the approved Product Monograph for Augtyro to address the identified safety concerns.

For more information, refer to the Product Monograph for Augtyro, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

7.2 Non-Clinical Basis for Decision

In vitro enzymatic assays demonstrated that repotrectinib inhibits autophosphorylation and the catalytic kinase activities of human proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS1 (ROS1) fusion protein and corresponding solvent front mutations ROS1G2032R and ROS1D2033N and gatekeeper mutation ROS1L2026M. The kinase half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for ROS1 and ROS1G203R when exposed to 10 µM adenosine triphosphate (ATP) were 0.0706 nM and 0.456 nM, respectively. Repotrectinib also inhibited the autophosphorylation and catalytic kinase activities of human anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and receptor tyrosine kinase (TRK)A, TRKB, and TRKC wild type and their mutant fusion proteins.

Repotrectinib demonstrated in vitro anti-proliferation activity in murine NIH3T3 and Ba/F3 cells expressing human syndecan 4 (SDC4)-ROS1 or cluster of differentiation 74 (CD74)-ROS1 and corresponding ROS1G2032R, ROS1D2033N, and ROS1L2026M mutations. Repotrectinib also demonstrated significant in vivo anti-tumour activity in mouse subcutaneous xenograft tumour models with murine NIH3T3 and Ba/F3 cells expressing human SDC4-ROS1 or CD74-ROS1 and corresponding ROS1G2032R, ROS1D2033N, and ROS1L2026M mutations at clinically relevant concentrations (twice daily an oral dose of 15 to 75 mg/kg/day for up to 28 days). Repotrectinib showed anti-proliferation activity and anti-tumour activity against other primary targets, including ALK, TRKA, TRKB, and TRKC, and their corresponding mutant fusion proteins.

Overall, the non-clinical pharmacodynamic data support the potential clinical efficacy benefit of repotrectinib in patients with advanced ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in first-line treatment and in patients developing resistance to crizotinib and entrectinib due to solvent front mutations.

Dedicated in vivo safety pharmacology studies were not conducted, which is consistent with the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) S9 Guideline. However, in vitro, repotrectinib had no significant inhibitory effect on the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG), voltage-gated sodium (hNav1.5), or voltage-gated calcium (hCav1.2) channels.

In single oral dose pharmacokinetic studies, repotrectinib exhibited rapid absorption and low to moderate bioavailability in the preclinical species; the bioavailability of repotrectinib ranged from 32% to 38% in mice and 44.7% to 61.4% in rats, and was 25.3% in beagle dogs and 13.5% in cynomolgus monkeys.

Repotrectinib binding to human plasma protein was 95.4% in vitro. The blood-to-plasma ratio was 0.56 in vitro, indicating that the distribution into humans blood cells was low.

A quantitative whole-body autoradiography study in the Long-Evans rat demonstrated rapid and widespread distribution of radiolabeled repotrectinib ([14C]repotrectinib) with low penetration into the brain. Pigmented skin, uveal tract, liver, renal cortex, and kidneys were the tissues with the highest radioactivity exposure in male and female rats. All radioactivity was cleared by 168 hours post dose, suggesting that there was no accumulation of repotrectinib or long-lived metabolites.

The major route of excretion for repotrectinib and its metabolites was via the feces in monkeys and rats. Urinary elimination was a minor pathway. Unchanged repotrectinib was the major drug-related substance in plasma.

Repotrectinib is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 to form oxidative metabolites, followed by secondary glucuronidation. All metabolites formed in humans were also formed in rats and monkeys. No individual metabolite represented greater than 10% exposure to the parent compound in rats and monkeys or in humans. Based on in vitro studies, repotrectinib potentially inhibits CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP3A4/5 (at the gut level) at clinically relevant concentrations but has minimal potential to inhibit other CYP enzymes. Repotrectinib also induces CYP2B6, CYP3A4, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 enzymes at clinically relevant concentrations. Repotrectinib also has the potential to induce uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1.

In vitro data indicate that repotrectinib may have the potential to inhibit P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1, and multidrug and toxin extrusion protein (MATE)2-K at clinically relevant concentrations. Repotrectinib is also a substrate for P-gp and a potential substrate for MATE2-K and BCRP.

The reproductive and developmental toxicity studies for repotrectinib were conducted in accordance with ICH S5(R3) and ICH S9 guidelines, and are considered appropriate given the indication in patients with advanced lung cancer. Given the findings of fetal external malformations (hindlimbs) in an initial exploratory dose-finding study in rats, there were no dedicated embryofetal toxicity studies conducted. Other findings from this exploratory study included skin scabbing/abrasions in pregnant females, consistent with the skin effects observed in the three-month general toxicology study in rats, and decreased mean fetal body weight. There were no effects on uterine implantation parameters, uterine weight, or fetal sex ratio. Additionally, a dedicated, Good Laboratory Practices (GLP)-compliant juvenile toxicity study showed decreased birth weight gain and femur lengths in pups. Finally, another GLP-compliant study in rats showed no evidence of cutaneous or ocular phototoxicity with repotrectinib.

The results of the non-clinical studies as well as the potential risks to humans have been included in the Product Monograph for Augtyro. In view of the intended use of Augtyro, there are no pharmacological or toxicological issues within this submission which preclude authorization of the product.

For more information, refer to the Product Monograph for Augtyro, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

7.3 Quality Basis for Decision

The quality (chemistry and manufacturing) information submitted for Augtyro has demonstrated that the drug substance and drug product can be consistently manufactured to meet the approved specifications. Proper pharmaceutical development and supporting studies were conducted and an adequate control strategy is in place for the commercial processes. Changes to the manufacturing process and formulation (if any) made throughout the pharmaceutical development are considered acceptable upon review. Based on the stability data submitted, the proposed shelf life of 36 months is acceptable when the drug product is stored at room temperature (15 ºC to 30 ºC).

The proposed drug-related impurity limits are considered adequately qualified (e.g., within International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use [ICH] limits and/or qualified from toxicological studies, as needed).

A risk assessment for the potential presence of nitrosamine impurities was conducted according to requirements outlined in Health Canada’s Guidance on Nitrosamine Impurities in Medications. The risks relating to the potential presence of nitrosamine impurities in the drug substance and/or drug product are considered negligible or have been adequately addressed (e.g., with qualified limits and a suitable control strategy).

All sites involved in production are compliant with good manufacturing practices.

None of the non-medicinal ingredients (excipients) in the drug product are prohibited for use in drug products by the Food and Drug Regulations.

One excipient in the capsule shell, gelatin, is of animal origin. The sponsor provided a Certificate of Suitability from the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines.