Summary Basis of Decision for Iqirvo

Review decision

The Summary Basis of Decision explains why the product was approved for sale in Canada. The document includes regulatory, safety, effectiveness and quality (in terms of chemistry and manufacturing) considerations.


Product type:

Drug
Summary Basis of Decision (SBD)

Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) documents provide information related to the original authorization of a product. The SBD for Iqirvo is located below.

Recent Activity for Iqirvo

The SBDs written for eligible drugs (as outlined in Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision [SBD] Project: Phase II) approved after September 1, 2012 will be updated to include post-authorization information. This information will be compiled in a Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT). The PAAT will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada's decisions were negative or positive. The PAATs will be updated regularly with post-authorization activity throughout the product life cycle. At this time, no PAAT is available for Iqirvo. When the PAAT for Iqirvo becomes available, it will be incorporated into this SBD.

Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) for Iqirvo

Date SBD issued: 2025-07-07

The following information relates to the New Drug Submission for Iqirvo.

Elafibranor

Drug Identification Number (DIN): DIN 02557010 – 80 mg elafibranor, tablet, oral administration

Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Canada Inc.

New Drug Submission Control Number: 287772

Submission Type: New Drug Submission (New Active Substance) - Notice of Compliance with Conditions

Therapeutic Area (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] Classification, second level): A05 Bile and Liver Therapy

Date Filed: 2024-06-19

Authorization Date: 2025-04-25

On April 25, 2025, Health Canada issued a Notice of Compliance under the Guidance Document: Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c) to Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Canada Inc. for the drug product Iqirvo. The product was authorized under the NOC/c Guidance on the basis of the promising nature of the clinical evidence, and the need for further follow-up to confirm the clinical benefit. Patients should be advised of the fact that the market authorization was issued with conditions.

The market authorization of Iqirvo was based on quality (chemistry and manufacturing), non‑clinical (pharmacology and toxicology), and clinical (pharmacology, safety, and efficacy) information submitted. Based on Health Canada’s review, the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of Iqirvo is favourable for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in adults with an inadequate response to UDCA, or as monotherapy in adults unable to tolerate UDCA.

Marketing authorization with conditions for this indication is based on a randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase III study that assessed alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and bilirubin as a composite biochemical surrogate endpoint.

1 What was approved?

Iqirvo, a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha (α)/delta (𝛿) agonist, was authorized for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in adults with an inadequate response to UDCA, or as monotherapy in adults unable to tolerate UDCA.

Marketing authorization with conditions for this indication is based on a randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase III study that assessed alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and bilirubin as a composite biochemical surrogate endpoint.

No data are available to Health Canada regarding efficacy and safety in pediatric patients (17 years of age and younger). Therefore, Health Canada has not authorized an indication for pediatric use.

Evidence from clinical studies and experience suggests that use in patients 65 to 75 years of age is not associated with differences in safety or effectiveness compared to younger patients. There is limited clinical experience in patients older than 75 years of age.

Iqirvo (80 mg elafibranor) is presented as a tablet. In addition to the medicinal ingredient, the tablet contains anhydrous colloidal silica, croscarmellose sodium, iron oxide red, iron oxide yellow, macrogol, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol-part hydrolyzed, povidone, talc, and titanium dioxide.

The use of Iqirvo is contraindicated in patients who are:

  • pregnant, or at risk of pregnancy and not using effective contraception;

  • hypersensitive to this drug or to any ingredient in the formulation, including any nonmedicinal ingredient, or component of the container; or

  • known to have decompensated cirrhosis.

The drug product was approved for use under the conditions stated in its Product Monograph taking into consideration the potential risks associated with its administration. The Product Monograph for Iqirvo is available through the Drug Product Database.

For more information about the rationale for Health Canada's decision, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

2 Why was Iqirvo approved?

Health Canada considers that the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of Iqirvo is favourable for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in adults with an inadequate response to UDCA, or as monotherapy in adults unable to tolerate UDCA.

Marketing authorization with conditions for this indication is based on a randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase III study that assessed alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and bilirubin as a composite biochemical surrogate endpoint.

Iqirvo was authorized under the Guidance Document: Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c) on the basis of the promising nature of the clinical evidence, and the need for further follow-up to confirm the clinical benefit.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, progressive, autoimmune, cholestatic disease of the small hepatic bile ducts, which occurs in approximately 1 in 10,000 people. Though often asymptomatic at presentation (typically in women aged 40 to 60 years), most patients develop symptoms over the next 10 years that include itch, fatigue, dryness, abdominal discomfort, insomnia, and cognitive dysfunction. With progressive ductopenia and liver fibrosis, patients with PBC can progress to jaundice, cirrhosis and portal hypertension, liver failure, and an elevated risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. If PBC is left untreated, these complications shorten average survival.

In Canada, UDCA is approved as first-line therapy for patients with PBC to delay the pathological progression of PBC and improve liver transplant-free survival. One third of patients with PBC have inadequate responses to UDCA, which is associated with faster progression of PBC and decreased survival. Additionally, approximately 1 in 25 patients do not tolerate UDCA.

In 2016, Health Canada conditionally approved obeticholic acid to treat patients with PBC with inadequate responses to UDCA, or to be given as monotherapy for UDCA-intolerant patients. In 2022, Health Canada contraindicated obeticholic acid in patients with advanced liver disease.

Iqirvo (elafibranor) is an agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α and 𝛿. Activation of PPAR α and 𝛿 reduces bile acid toxicity in PBC and thereby slows disease progression.

Study 319 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study designed to assess the clinical efficacy of Iqirvo as a second-line treatment for PBC and was conducted in 161 adult patients. Ninety-five percent (95%) of patients had an inadequate response to UDCA, while 5% of patients were intolerant to UDCA. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive 80 mg elafibranor (108 patients) or placebo (53 patients) once daily for at least 52 weeks. Patients with UDCA tolerance continued their pre-study UDCA dose. Ninety-six percent (96%) of patients were female, and 91% of patients were white. The mean age of patients was 57 years, and patients were an average of 8 years from their PBC diagnoses.

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a biochemical cholestasis response at 52 weeks. This response was defined as a total bilirubin level less than or equal to the upper limit of normal (ULN), an alkaline phosphatase level less than 1.67 times the ULN, and a decrease in alkaline phosphatase by 15% or more. At 52 weeks, 50.9% of Iqirvo-treated patients and 3.8% of placebo-treated patients had a cholestasis response (risk difference of 47.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.0% to 56.9%).

The clinical safety of Iqirvo was evaluated primarily in the 161 patients in Study 319. The full safety population exposed to elafibranor included 138 patients with PBC, 1,615 patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), and 835 other patients (healthy participants, elderly participants, participants with renal impairment, hepatic impairment, obesity and/or abnormal glucose tolerance, diabetes mellitus, and patients with dyslipidemia).

The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar between patients that received Iqirvo and placebo, with respect to the total incidence of TEAEs (96% versus 91%), study medication-related TEAEs (39% versus 40%), mild TEAEs (37% versus 32%), moderate TEAEs (49% versus 47%), severe TEAEs (10% versus 11%), serious TEAEs (10% versus 13%), serious and study medication-related TEAEs (2.8% versus 1.9%), and TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (10% versus 9%). Fatal TEAEs occurred in two Iqirvo-treated patients, but both deaths were determined to be unrelated to the study medication. No fatal TEAEs occurred in placebo-treated patients.

Gastrointestinal TEAEs were very common, and included vomiting (11% versus 2%), nausea (11% versus 6%), abdominal pain (11% versus 6%), and diarrhea (11% versus 9%). Less frequent but more significant adverse reactions included fracture (6% versus 0%), cholelithiasis (3% versus 0%), and rhabdomyolysis (1% versus 0%) in the context of more frequent creatinine phosphokinase elevation (3% versus 0%).

Two major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were reported in Study 319 in patients treated with Iqirvo, which were associated with death but determined to be unrelated to the study drug. No MACE were reported in placebo-treated patients in Study 319. Major adverse cardiac events were also observed in a Phase III study in patients with MASH (Study 315), in which 1,437 patients were treated with Iqirvo, 720 patients were treated with placebo, 61% of patients were male, and patients with PBC were excluded. The administered dose was 1.5 times higher (120 mg in Study 315 in patients with MASH versus 80 mg in Study 319 in patients with PBC), however, it was comparable when measured as mg/kg. The hazard ratio for MACE in Study 315 was 2.45 (95% CI: 1.02, 5.91), with MACE rates of 2.0% in Iqirvo-treated patients and 0.8% in placebo-treated patients.

The data reviewed indicate that Iqirvo has the potential to offer a statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in the benefit/risk profile over existing therapies on the Canadian market to treat PBC, a serious, life-threatening disease. Based on the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of the product, it is recommended that Iqirvo be authorized with conditions.

The completion of two studies is required for full approval of Iqirvo: a long-term extension (LTE) of Study 319 (ongoing; final report expected by November 2028), and Study 454 (final report expected by May 2030). The ongoing LTE of Study 319 is expected to provide complementary safety and efficacy data from up to 5 years of follow-up on an 80 mg daily dose of Iqirvo, following the double-blind period of Study 319. Study 454 will evaluate the efficacy of a daily oral dose of 80 mg Iqirvo in extending hepatic event-free survival in patients with cirrhotic PBC.

A Risk Management Plan (RMP) for Iqirvo was submitted by Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Canada Inc. to Health Canada. The RMP is designed to describe known and potential safety issues, to present the monitoring scheme, and when needed, to describe measures that will be put in place to minimize risks associated with the product. Upon review, the RMP was considered to be acceptable.

The submitted inner and outer labels, package insert and Patient Medication Information section of the Product Monograph for Iqirvo met the necessary regulatory labelling, plain language, and design element requirements.

The sponsor submitted a brand name assessment that included testing for look‑alike sound‑alike attributes. Upon review, the proposed name Iqirvo was accepted.

Iqirvo has an acceptable safety profile based on the non-clinical data and clinical studies. The identified safety issues can be managed through labelling and monitoring. Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the Product Monograph for Iqirvo to address the identified safety concerns. As described within the framework of the NOC/c Guidance, safety monitoring of the use of Iqirvo will be ongoing. Further evaluation will take place upon the submission of the requested studies after they become available.

This New Drug Submission complies with the requirements of sections C.08.002 and C.08.005.1 and therefore Health Canada has issued the Notice of Compliance pursuant to section C.08.004 of the Food and Drug Regulations. For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

3 What steps led to the approval of Iqirvo?

The sponsor filed a request for Advance Consideration under the Guidance Document: Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c) for the review of the New Drug Submission (NDS) for Iqirvo. The sponsor presented promising evidence of clinical effectiveness that Iqirvo has the potential to provide effective treatment of a serious, life-threatening, or severely debilitating disease that is not adequately managed by a drug marketed in Canada.

Subsequent review led to the decision to issue the sponsor market authorization under the NOC/c Guidance, in recognition of the promising but unconfirmed evidence of clinical effectiveness in the submission. In keeping with the provisions of the NOC/c Guidance, the sponsor agreed to provide additional information to confirm the clinical benefit (described in the What follow-up measures will the company take? section).

The review of the New Drug Submission (NDS) for Iqirvo was based on a critical assessment of the data package submitted to Health Canada. The reviews completed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were used as added reference for the review of the quality (FDA only) and clinical (FDA and EMA) components of the NDS, as per Method 3 described in the Draft Guidance Document: The Use of Foreign Reviews by Health Canada. The review of the non-clinical component of the NDS employed a mix of methods described in the guidance document. The Canadian regulatory decision on the Iqirvo NDS was made independently based on the Canadian review.

For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Guidance Document: The Management of Drug Submissions and Applications.

Submission Milestones: Iqirvo

Submission Milestone

Date

Pre-submission meeting

2024-02-14

Advance Consideration under the Notice of Compliance with Conditions Guidance accepted

2024-04-17

New Drug Submission filed

2024-06-19

Screening

Screening Deficiency Notice issued

2024-07-22

Response to Screening Deficiency Notice filed

2024-08-09

Screening Acceptance Letter issued

2024-09-03

Review

Quality evaluation completed

2025-02-25

Biopharmaceutics evaluation completed

2025-03-05

Review of Risk Management Plan completed

2025-03-06

Clinical/medical evaluation completed

2025-03-12

Non-clinical evaluation completed

2025-03-13

Labelling review completed

2025-03-13

Notice of Compliance with Conditions Qualifying Notice issued

2025-03-20

Review of Response to Notice of Compliance with Conditions Qualifying Notice

Response filed (Letter of Undertaking)

2025-03-26

Clinical/medical evaluation completed

2025-04-24

Notice of Compliance issued by Director General, Pharmaceutical Drugs Directorate under the Notice of Compliance with Conditions Guidance

2025-04-25

4 What follow-up measures will the company take?

Requirements for post-market commitments are outlined in the Food and Drugs Act and Food and Drug Regulations and in the Guidance Document: Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c). Notably, the sponsor has agreed to complete and submit final reports for two studies:

  • A long-term extension of the Phase III Study 319 (final report expected by November 2028), and

  • Study 454, an efficacy and safety study (final report expected by May 2030).

In addition to keeping the primary analysis of time to “hepatic event-free survival”, the sponsor has agreed to add two secondary analyses to Study 454:

  1. The time to

    • The primary endpoint, or

    • Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), rhabdomyolysis with acute kidney injury, fetal or neonatal major birth defects or spontaneous abortion/miscarriage, new-onset Crohn’s disease, new-onset Parkinsonism or severe-intensity tremor/ataxia/fasciculations, or

    • Hip or femur fracture.

  2. The time to the primary endpoint, or MACE, or the labelled adverse drug reactions from the adverse events listed in “i”.

  3. In addition to the planned subgroup analyses of Study 454, the sponsor has agreed to conduct a subgroup analysis of patients with and without portal hypertension.

The sponsor is expected to submit status reports on the progress of ongoing confirmatory trials on an annual basis.

5 What post-authorization activity has taken place for Iqirvo?

Summary Basis of Decision documents (SBDs) for eligible drugs (as outlined in Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision [SBD] Project: Phase II) authorized after September 1, 2012 will include post-authorization information in a table format. The Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT) will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada’s decisions were negative or positive. The PAAT will continue to be updated during the product life cycle.

At this time, no PAAT is available for Iqirvo. When available, the PAAT will be incorporated into this SBD.

For the latest advisories, warnings and recalls for marketed products, see MedEffect Canada.

6 What other information is available about drugs?

Up-to-date information on drug products can be found at the following links:

7 What was the scientific rationale for Health Canada’s decision?

Refer to the What steps led to the approval of Iqirvo? section for more information about the review process for this submission.

7.1 Clinical Basis for Decision

Clinical Pharmacology

Elafibranor (the medicinal ingredient in Iqirvo) and its main active metabolite, GFT1007, are first-in-class dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α/𝛿 agonists. The activation of PPARα and PPAR𝛿 modulate complementary pathways involved in the pathogenesis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

The activation of PPARα decreases bile acid (BA) synthesis, increases BA detoxification, and modulates BA output. This results in decreased bile toxicity and less injury to cholangiocytes and hepatocytes. The activation of PPAR𝛿 also regulates transporters that absorb and secrete bile components, contributing to decreased bile toxicity and improved cholestasis.

The liver-specific activation of PPARα and PPAR𝛿 by elafibranor also has anti-inflammatory effects by acting on different pathways of inflammation, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL6) pathways, respectively.

The pharmacokinetics of elafibranor and its potential for drug-drug interactions were studied in patient populations and in healthy subjects. Studies were also conducted to characterize the pharmacology of GFT1007 and the inactive metabolites GFT3351 and GFT4775.

The mean exposures of elafibranor and GFT1007, as measured by the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24h) increased linearly with a daily intake of elafibranor ranging from 40 mg to 300 mg (0.5 to 3.75 times the indicated dose). With once-daily dosing, steady state was achieved by Day 14 for elafibranor and by Day 7 for GFT1007. The pharmacokinetics of both elafibranor and GFT1007 are independent of time after 16 days of repeated oral administration.

The major aspects of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination were adequately characterized. Elafibranor is rapidly absorbed, with median peak plasma levels of elafibranor and GFT1007 occurring within 1.25 hours in patients with PBC receiving a once-daily dose of 80 mg. Elafibranor can be taken with or without food, as the pharmacokinetic differences between fed and fasted conditions were determined to have limited clinical impact. Orally administered 14C radiolabelled elafibranor was rapidly hydrolyzed to the active metabolite, GFT1007. In addition to GFT1007, glucuronide conjugates (inactive metabolites) were also identified in plasma. Following a single 80 mg dose under fasted conditions, the mean elimination half-life was 68.2 hours for elafibranor, and 15.4 hours for GFT1007. In healthy subjects, approximately 77.1% of a single 120 mg orally administered 14C radiolabelled dose of elafibranor was recovered in feces. It was recovered primarily as elafibranor and GFT1007 (56.7% and 6.08% of the administered dose, respectively). Approximately 19.3% was recovered in urine, primarily as glucuronide conjugate GFT3351 (11.8% of the administered dose).

No dosing adjustments are required for patients with mild or moderate (Child Pugh A or B) hepatic impairment. However, Iqirvo is not recommended for patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child Pugh C).

No dosing adjustments are required for patients with renal impairment.

There was no evidence that age (from 18 to 80 years old), gender, race, body mass index (BMI), or renal status had any clinically meaningful impact on the pharmacokinetics of elafibranor and GFT1007.

In healthy volunteers, daily doses of elafibranor up to 300 mg did not cause clinically significant corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation.

For further details, please refer to the Product Monograph for Iqirvo, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Efficacy

The clinical efficacy of Iqirvo as a second-line treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) was mainly evaluated in Study 319, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study in 161 adult patients with PBC. Ninety-five percent (95%) of patients had an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), while 5% of patients were intolerant to UDCA. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive 80 mg elafibranor (108 patients) or placebo (53 patients) once daily for at least 52 weeks. Patients with UDCA tolerance continued their pre-study UDCA dose.

Patients were included in the study if their alkaline phosphatase level was greater than or equal to 1.67 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) and their total bilirubin level was less than or equal to 2 times the ULN. Patients were excluded from the study for decompensated cirrhosis, for other significant medical conditions, or for the potential to become pregnant without highly effective contraception. Ninety-six percent (96%) of patients were female, and 91% of patients were white. The mean age of patients was 57 years, and patients were an average of 8 years from their PBC diagnoses.

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a biochemical cholestasis response at 52 weeks. This response was defined as a total bilirubin level less than or equal to the ULN, an alkaline phosphatase level less than 1.67 times the ULN, and a decrease in alkaline phosphatase by 15% or more. The endpoint is consistent with international specialty guidance, regulatory precedent with obeticholic acid (another treatment for PBC), and published prognostic literature.

Key secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with alkaline phosphatase normalization after 52 weeks and the change from baseline to 52 weeks in the PBC Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (PBC WI NRS) scores among the 66 patients with moderate-to-severe pruritus (baseline PBC WI NRS score of 4 or higher).

At 52 weeks, 50.9% of Iqirvo-treated patients and 3.8% of placebo-treated patients had a cholestasis response (risk difference of 47.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.0% to 56.9%). Alkaline phosphatase normalization was observed in 14.8% of Iqirvo-treated patients and 0% of placebo-treated patients (p = 0.0019). In patients with pruritus, the least squares mean pruritus change from baseline trended lower by 0.784 points in Iqirvo-treated patients than in placebo-treated patients (95% CI: -1.986, 0.418). Additionally, after 52 weeks, the absolute change from baseline in the modelled 15-year transplant-free survival rate trended higher with Iqirvo than with placebo based on the United Kingdom PBC score (+1.95%, unadjusted p = 0.0026) and the GLOBE score (+4.26%, unadjusted p<0.0001).

Indication

The New Drug Submission for Iqirvo was filed by the sponsor with the following proposed indication, which Health Canada subsequently approved:

Iqirvo (elafibranor) is indicated for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in adults with an inadequate response to UDCA, or as monotherapy in adults unable to tolerate UDCA.

For more information, refer to the Product Monograph for Iqirvo, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Safety

The clinical safety of Iqirvo was evaluated primarily in the 161 patients in Study 319, described above in the Clinical Efficacy section. The full safety population exposed to elafibranor included 138 patients with PBC, 1,615 patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), and 835 other patients (healthy participants, elderly participants, participants with renal impairment, hepatic impairment, obesity and/or abnormal glucose tolerance, diabetes mellitus, and patients with dyslipidemia).

The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar between patients that received Iqirvo and placebo, with respect to the total incidence of TEAEs (96% versus 91%), study medication-related TEAEs (39% versus 40%), mild TEAEs (37% versus 32%), moderate TEAEs (49% versus 47%), severe TEAEs (10% versus 11%), serious TEAEs (10% versus 13%), serious and study medication-related TEAEs (2.8% versus 1.9%), and TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (10% versus 9%). Fatal TEAEs occurred in two Iqirvo-treated patients, but both deaths were determined to be unrelated to the study medication. No fatal TEAEs occurred in placebo-treated patients.

Gastrointestinal TEAEs were very common, and included vomiting (11% versus 2%), nausea (11% versus 6%), abdominal pain (11% versus 6%), and diarrhea (11% versus 9%). Less frequent but more significant adverse reactions included fracture (6% versus 0%), cholelithiasis (3% versus 0%), and rhabdomyolysis (1% versus 0%) in the context of more frequent creatinine phosphokinase elevation (3% versus 0%).

Two major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were reported in Study 319 in patients treated with Iqirvo, which were associated with death but determined to be unrelated to the study drug. No MACE were reported in placebo-treated patients. Major adverse cardiac events were also observed in a Phase III study in patients with MASH (Study 315), in which 1,437 patients were treated with Iqirvo, 720 patients were treated with placebo, 61% of patients were male, and patients with PBC were excluded. The administered dose was 1.5 times higher (120 mg in Study 315 in patients with MASH versus 80 mg in Study 319 in patients with PBC), however, it was comparable when measured as mg/kg. The hazard ratio for MACE in Study 315 was 2.45 (95% CI: 1.02, 5.91), with MACE rates of 2.0% in Iqirvo-treated patients and 0.8% in placebo-treated patients. The higher frequency of MACE observed in patients with MASH is included in the Product Monograph for Iqirvo.

The submitted data used surrogate efficacy endpoints to demonstrate likely clinical improvement. The data reviewed indicate that Iqirvo has the potential to offer a statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in the benefit/risk profile over existing therapies on the Canadian market to treat PBC; a serious, life-threatening disease. Additionally, Iqirvo presents an acceptable and manageable safety profile in the intended patient population. Based on the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of the product, it is recommended that Iqirvo be authorized with conditions.

The completion of two studies is required for full approval of Iqirvo: a long-term extension (LTE) of Study 319 (ongoing; final report expected by November 2028), and Study 454 (final report expected by May 2030). The ongoing LTE of Study 319 is expected to provide complementary safety and efficacy data from up to 5 years of follow-up on an 80 mg daily dose of Iqirvo, following the double-blind period of Study 319.

Study 454 will evaluate the efficacy of a daily oral dose of 80 mg Iqirvo in extending hepatic event-free survival in patients with cirrhotic PBC. The time to hepatic event-free survival is defined as the time to either decompensation of cirrhosis (e.g., variceal bleed), a Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) version 3.0 score increasing from ≤12 to ≥15, liver transplant, or mortality. Recruitment is ongoing at the time of authorization. The sponsor is expected to provide secondary analyses of time to a composite endpoint of the primary endpoint or other significant adverse events, such as MACE. If the additional data from the Study 319 LTE and Study 454 confirm overall net clinical benefit, the conditions associated with this authorization may be removed.

For more information, refer to the Product Monograph for Iqirvo, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

7.2 Non-Clinical Basis for Decision

The general toxicology of elafibranor was assessed after single and repeat dose oral administration, for up to 6 months in rats and 12 months in monkeys. Studies were also conducted in mice.

Elafibranor had a favourable safety profile when administered to rats and mice as single oral doses in acute toxicity studies. In a 6-month repeat-dose study in rats, higher liver weights, hepatocellular hypertrophy, and/or liver necrosis were observed in rats exposed to doses of 3 mg/kg/day or higher. The relevance to humans of the liver findings in this study is uncertain, as they may be attributed to the expected rodent-specific peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)α-related liver toxicity. Excluding the liver effects, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was determined to be 100 mg/kg/day (15.4 times the recommended human dose [RHD]).

No adverse effects were observed in the 12-month monkey repeat-dose study up to the maximum tested dose of 50 mg/kg/day (15.7 times the RHD). In addition, up to the highest doses tested, elafibranor did not show any relevant effects on organs and systems previously described as being a safety concern with PPARγ agonists (weight gain, hemodilution, fluid retention leading to congestive heart failure, bladder cancer).

No safety issues were identified when assessing the potential effects of elafibranor on the cardiovascular, respiratory, and central nervous systems.

Carcinogenicity was evaluated in two studies in mice and rats, with elafibranor administered through oral gavage at doses of 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/kg/day for up to two years. Tumours were detected in the liver of mice and rats starting at the lower dose levels tested, and may be attributed to the expected rodent-specific PPARα-related liver toxicity. Therefore, the relevance of these findings to humans is uncertain.

Elafibranor, its principal active metabolite GFT1007, and the acyl glucuronide metabolite racemic GFT3351 are unlikely to pose a significant genotoxic risk to humans.

In a fertility and early embryonic development study in male and female rats, a lower fertility index, a lower mean percentage of live concepti, and a higher rate of post-implantation loss were observed at a dose of 100 mg/kg/day. The NOAEL for fertility in rats was 30 mg/kg/day (5.3 times the RHD). Evidence of developmental toxicity has been observed in both rats and rabbits administered elafibranor.

In pregnant rats, no effects were observed on embryofetal development following the administration of elafibranor at doses up to 300 mg/kg/day (approximately 100 times the RHD) during the period of organogenesis (from gestation days 6 to 17). At the 1,000 mg/kg/day dose level (approximately 167 times the RHD), observations included higher rates of post-implantation loss and total resorptions, lower numbers of live fetuses and lower number of fetuses per dam, lower fetal body weights, and visceral and skeletal variations (short innominate artery and incomplete ossification). However, no fetal malformations were observed at this dose level.

In pregnant rabbits, the administration of elafibranor during organogenesis at the high dose of 300 mg/kg/day (3 times the RHD) was associated with marked maternal toxicity, increased embryolethality, and reduced fetal weight plus fetal malformations. Despite maternal toxicity observed at the mid dose of 100 mg/kg/day (0.5 times the RHD), no effects were observed on embryofetal survival, fetal weight, or fetal malformations. The only finding was fetal ossification variations in the distal limb bones. No adverse effects were observed on embryofetal development at the low dose of 30 mg/kg/day (approximately 0.1 times the RHD).

A pre- and postnatal study was conducted in rats, in which maternal exposures to elafibranor (at or above 2 times the RHD) was associated with reduced pup survival, blue/black discolouration of the caudal section of some pups, lower pup body weights, and developmental delays at all doses. Low levels of plasma GFT1007 (the active metabolite of elafibranor) were detected in 2 pups who had been maternally exposed at the highest dose level. Therefore, elafibranor could potentially be transferred via lactation.

The results of the non-clinical studies as well as the potential risks to humans have been included in the Product Monograph for Iqirvo. Considering the intended use of Iqirvo, there are no pharmacological or toxicological issues within this submission which preclude authorization of the product.

For more information, refer to the Product Monograph for Iqirvo, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

7.3 Quality Basis for Decision

The quality (chemistry and manufacturing) information submitted for Iqirvo has demonstrated that the drug substance and drug product can be consistently manufactured to meet the approved specifications. Proper pharmaceutical development and supporting studies were conducted and an adequate control strategy is in place for the commercial processes. Changes to the manufacturing process and formulation (if any) made throughout the pharmaceutical development are considered acceptable upon review. Based on the stability data submitted, the proposed shelf life of 36 months is acceptable when the drug product is stored at room temperature (15 ºC to 30 ºC).

The proposed drug-related impurity limits are considered adequately qualified (e.g., within International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use [ICH] limits and/or qualified from toxicological studies, as needed).

A risk assessment for the potential presence of nitrosamine impurities was conducted according to requirements outlined in Health Canada’s Guidance on Nitrosamine Impurities in Medications. The risks relating to the potential presence of nitrosamine impurities in the drug substance and/or drug product are considered negligible or have been adequately addressed (e.g., with qualified limits and a suitable control strategy).

All sites involved in production are compliant with good manufacturing practices.

None of the non-medicinal ingredients (excipients) in the drug product are prohibited for use in drug products by the Food and Drug Regulations.

None of the excipients used in the formulation of Iqirvo is of human or animal origin.