Summary Basis of Decision for Elahere
Review decision
The Summary Basis of Decision explains why the product was approved for sale in Canada. The document includes regulatory, safety, effectiveness and quality (in terms of chemistry and manufacturing) considerations.
Product type:
Contact:
Summary Basis of Decision (SBD)
Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) documents provide information related to the original authorization of a product. The SBD for Elahere is located below.
Recent Activity for Elahere
The SBDs written for eligible drugs (as outlined in Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision [SBD] Project: Phase II) approved after September 1, 2012 will be updated to include post-authorization information. This information will be compiled in a Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT). The PAAT will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada's decisions were negative or positive. The PAATs will be updated regularly with post-authorization activity throughout the product life cycle. At this time, no PAAT is available for Elahere. When the PAAT for Elahere becomes available, it will be incorporated into this SBD.
Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) for Elahere
Date SBD issued: 2025-10-23
The following information relates to the New Drug Submission for Elahere.
Mirvetuximab soravtansine
Drug Identification Number (DIN): 02560771 – mirvetuximab soravtansine
100 mg/20 mL, solution, intravenous infusion
AbbVie Corporation
New Drug Submission Control Number: 294637
Submission Type: New Drug Submission (New Active Substance) - Priority Review
Therapeutic Area (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] Classification, second level): L01 Antineoplastic agents
Date Filed: 2025-01-28
Authorization Date: 2025-08-29
On August 29, 2025, Health Canada issued a Notice of Compliance to AbbVie Corporation for the drug product Elahere.
The market authorization of Elahere was based on quality (chemistry and manufacturing), non‑clinical (pharmacology and toxicology), and clinical (pharmacology, safety, and efficacy) information submitted. Based on Health Canada’s review, the benefit-risk profile of Elahere is favourable when indicated as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with folate receptor alpha (FRα)-positive, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, who have received one to three prior systemic treatment regimens.
1 What was approved?
Elahere, an antineoplastic agent, was authorized for use as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with folate receptor alpha (FRα)-positive, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, who have received one to three prior systemic treatment regimens.
The efficacy and safety of Elahere have not been established in pediatric patients (younger than 18 years of age). Elahere is, therefore, not authorized for pediatric use.
No clinically meaningful differences in efficacy or safety were observed in geriatric patients (65 years of age or older) compared to younger adult patients.
Elahere (mirvetuximab soravtansine 100 mg/20 mL) is presented as a solution. In addition to the medicinal ingredient, the solution contains glacial acetic acid, polysorbate 20, sodium acetate, sucrose, and water for injection.
The use of Elahere is contraindicated in patients who are hypersensitive to this drug or to any ingredient in the formulation, including any non-medicinal ingredient, or component of the container.
The drug product was approved for use under the conditions stated in its Product Monograph taking into consideration the potential risks associated with its administration. The Product Monograph for Elahere is available through the Drug Product Database.
For more information about the rationale for Health Canada's decision, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.
2 Why was Elahere approved?
Health Canada considers that the benefit-risk profile of Elahere is favourable for use as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with folate receptor alpha (FRα)-positive, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, who have received one to three prior systemic treatment regimens.
Ovarian cancer is a serious and life-threatening disease often diagnosed in advanced stages. It has low five-year survival rates for Stage 3 (39%) and Stage 4 (17%) disease. Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) is defined by disease recurrence within 3 to 6 months after completion of a platinum-based chemotherapy. It represents a challenging subset of ovarian cancer due to its poor prognosis, limited treatment options, and relapse rates of up to 80%. In Canada, bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy is authorized for the treatment of PROC. Patients with PROC will often receive chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in earlier lines of therapy and upon disease recurrence, patients will only receive sequential single-agent chemotherapy. Single-agent chemotherapies commonly used to treat PROC include paclitaxel, topotecan, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin.
Elahere contains the medicinal ingredient mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV), an antibody-drug conjugate. It functions by binding with high specificity and affinity to FRα, which has limited expression in normal tissues and high expression in several solid tumors, including serous epithelial ovarian cancer. In high-grade serous ovarian cancer, the most common subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, FRα expression is observed in up to 80% of cases, making it an attractive target for diagnostic and therapeutic development. Mirvetuximab soravtansine consists of an anti-FRα monoclonal antibody (of immunoglobulin G1 subtype) covalently attached to the cytotoxic maytansinoid DM4 via a cleavable linker. Upon binding to FRα, MIRV is internalized and DM4 (the payload) is released intracellularly following proteolytic cleavage of the linker. The antimitotic agent DM4 inhibits tubulin polymerization and microtubule assembly, resulting in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.
The market authorization of Elahere was primarily based on the results of the pivotal Study 0416 (MIRASOL), a Phase III, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study that evaluated the use of Elahere as compared to investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan; hereafter referred to as IC Chemo) in adult female patients with platinum-resistant advanced high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers. All patients were required to have tumours with high expression of FRα (defined as 75% or more of viable tumour cells with moderate [2+] or strong [3+] staining intensity by immunohistochemistry). Each patient had received one to three prior systemic treatment regimens.
A total of 453 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the Elahere arm (total number [n] = 227) or the IC Chemo arm (n = 226). Patients in the Elahere arm were administered Elahere at a dose of 6 mg/kg (based on adjusted ideal body weight [AIBW]) every 3 weeks. Patients in the IC Chemo arm were administered one of four regimens: 1) paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) once every week with a 4‑week cycle, 2) pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m2) every 4 weeks, 3) topotecan (4 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks, or 4) topotecan (1.25 mg/m2) for five consecutive days every three weeks. In both arms, patients continued to receive study drug until disease progression, the occurrence of unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, death, or study termination by the sponsor - whichever came first.
The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary efficacy endpoints were investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). At the time of final PFS analysis and interim OS analysis, statistically significant improvements were demonstrated for both the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints of the study. The median PFS was 5.62 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.34, 5.95) in the Elahere arm compared to 3.98 months (95% CI: 2.86, 4.47) in the IC Chemo arm with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.521, 0.808; p <0.0001), representing a 35% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in the Elahere arm. The investigator-assessed ORR was 42.3% (95% CI: 35.8, 49.0) in the Elahere arm compared to 15.9% (95% CI: 11.4, 21.4) in the IC Chemo arm (p <0.0001). With a median follow-up of 13.11 months, the median OS was 16.46 months for the Elahere arm compared to 12.75 months for the IC Chemo arm with a HR of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.504, 0.885; p = 0.0046), representing a 33% reduction in the risk of death in the Elahere arm.
The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (occurring with 20% or greater incidence) reported in patients treated with Elahere were blurred vision, keratopathy, abdominal pain, fatigue, diarrhea, dry eye, constipation, nausea, and peripheral neuropathy. Ocular disorders, peripheral neuropathies and pneumonitis were considered important identified risks associated with Elahere. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 24% of patients treated with Elahere with the most common being pleural effusion (3%) and small intestinal obstruction (2%). Seven treatment-related fatal adverse events were reported among patients receiving Elahere, including intestinal obstruction, dyspnea in the setting of subileus, neutropenic sepsis, cardiopulmonary failure, respiratory failure, ischemic stroke, and pulmonary embolus.
A Serious Warnings and Precautions box describing the risk of severe ocular adverse reactions including blurred vision, keratopathy (corneal disorders), dry eye, photophobia, and eye pain has been included in the Product Monograph for Elahere.
A Risk Management Plan (RMP) for Elahere was submitted by AbbVie Corporation to Health Canada. The RMP is designed to describe known and potential safety issues, to present the monitoring scheme, and when needed, to describe measures that will be put in place to minimize risks associated with the product. Upon review, the RMP was considered to be acceptable. As a Canadian-specific additional risk minimization measure for the important identified risk of ocular disorders, a Patient Wallet Card targeted to patients treated with Elahere will be made available by the sponsor. Educational materials for patients and caregivers related to product use and safety information are also available through the sponsor.
The submitted inner and outer labels and Patient Medication Information section of the Product Monograph for Elahere met the necessary regulatory labelling, plain language, and design element requirements. The content of the package insert was reviewed and found to be satisfactory.
The sponsor submitted a brand name assessment that included testing for look‑alike sound‑alike attributes. Upon review, the proposed name Elahere was accepted.
Based on non-clinical and clinical studies, Elahere has been shown to have a favourable benefit-risk profile in the target patient population when used under the conditions of use recommended in the approved Product Monograph for Elahere. The identified safety issues can be managed through labelling and monitoring. Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the Product Monograph for Elahere to address the identified safety concerns.
This New Drug Submission complies with the requirements of sections C.08.002 and C.08.005.1 and therefore Health Canada has issued the Notice of Compliance pursuant to section C.08.004 of the Food and Drug Regulations. For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.
3 What steps led to the approval of Elahere?
The New Drug Submission (NDS) for Elahere was subject to an expedited review process under the Priority Review of Drug Submissions Policy. The sponsor presented substantial evidence of clinical effectiveness to demonstrate that Elahere provides a significant increase in efficacy and/or significant decrease in risk such that the overall benefit-risk profile is improved over existing therapies for a serious, life-threatening or severely debilitating disease that is not adequately managed by a drug marketed in Canada.
Two methods for the use of foreign reviews were applied during Health Canada’s review of the clinical, non-clinical, and quality components of the NDS for Elahere. The reviews completed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were used as added references for the review of the non-clinical, clinical, and clinical pharmacology components, and part of the quality (DM4 [payload] and linker of the drug substance) component, as per Method 3 described in the Draft Guidance Document: The Use of Foreign Reviews by Health Canada. As per Method 2, part of the review of the quality component (the monoclonal antibody intermediate and the antibody-drug conjugate) of the NDS for Elahere was based on a critical assessment of the quality reviews conducted by the EMA and the FDA. The data package submitted to Health Canada was referred to as necessary. The Canadian regulatory decision on the Elahere NDS was made independently based on the Canadian review.
For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Guidance Document: The Management of Drug Submissions and Applications.
Submission Milestones: Elahere
|
Submission Milestone |
Date |
|---|---|
|
Pre-submission meeting |
2024-11-25 |
|
Request for priority status filed |
2024-11-27 |
|
Request for priority status approved |
2024-12-23 |
|
New Drug Submission filed |
2025-01-28 |
|
Screening |
|
|
Screening Acceptance Letter issued |
2025-03-03 |
|
Review |
|
|
Review of Risk Management Plan completed |
2025-07-21 |
|
Biostatistics evaluation completed |
2025-08-14 |
|
Non-clinical evaluation completed |
2025-08-20 |
|
Quality evaluation completed |
2025-08-25 |
|
Clinical/medical evaluation completed |
2025-08-28 |
|
Labelling review completed |
2025-08-28 |
|
Notice of Compliance issued by Director General, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate |
2025-08-29 |
4 What follow-up measures will the company take?
Requirements for post-market commitments are outlined in the Food and Drugs Act and Food and Drug Regulations.
5 What post-authorization activity has taken place for Elahere?
Summary Basis of Decision documents (SBDs) for eligible drugs (as outlined in Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision [SBD] Project: Phase II) authorized after September 1, 2012 will include post-authorization information in a table format. The Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT) will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada’s decisions were negative or positive. The PAAT will continue to be updated during the product life cycle.
At this time, no PAAT is available for Elahere. When available, the PAAT will be incorporated into this SBD.
For the latest advisories, warnings and recalls for marketed products, see MedEffect Canada.
6 What other information is available about drugs?
Up-to-date information on drug products can be found at the following links:
-
See MedEffect Canada for the latest advisories, warnings and recalls for marketed products.
-
See the Notice of Compliance (NOC) Database for a listing of the authorization dates for all drugs that have been issued an NOC since 1994.
-
See the Drug Product Database (DPD) for the most recent Product Monograph. The DPD contains product-specific information on drugs that have been approved for use in Canada.
-
See the Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c)-related documents for the latest fact sheets and notices for products which were issued an NOC under the Guidance Document: Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c), if applicable. Clicking on a product name links to (as applicable) the Fact Sheet, Qualifying Notice, and Dear Health Care Professional Letter.
-
See the Patent Register for patents associated with medicinal ingredients, if applicable.
-
See the Register of Innovative Drugs for a list of drugs that are eligible for data protection under C.08.004.1 of the Food and Drug Regulations, if applicable.
7 What was the scientific rationale for Health Canada’s decision?
Refer to the What steps led to the approval of Elahere? section for more information about the review process for this submission.
7.1 Clinical Basis for Decision
Clinical Pharmacology
Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV), the medicinal ingredient in Elahere, is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of three components: an anti-folate receptor alpha (FRα) chimeric monoclonal antibody of immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) subtype, covalently attached to the small molecule anti-tubulin agent DM4 (a cytotoxic maytansinoid), via a cleavable linker. The antibody portion of the ADC binds to FRα expressed on the surface of ovarian cancer cells. Upon binding, MIRV is internalized followed by the intracellular release of DM4 via proteolytic cleavage. DM4 disrupts the microtubule network within the cell, resulting in cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of MIRV were evaluated from a combined dataset collected from 757 cancer patients who participated in four clinical studies (Study 0401 [a first-in-human study], and three Phase III Studies [Study 0403 {FORWARD}, Study 0417 {SORAYA} and the pivotal Study 0416 {MIRASOL}]). Only Study 0401 provided dense sampling suitable for reliable estimates of the PK parameters with a non-compartmental analysis. Studies 0417 and 0416 provided new information from a protocol with sparse sampling to re-estimate the parameters in an empirical population PK model.
The structural model of the population PK analysis consisted of two compartments to capture the biphasic PK profile of MIRV following intravenous infusion. The model assumed both linear and non-linear elimination from the central compartment for MIRV, a central and a target (tissue) compartment for the payload, and a central compartment for the metabolite. With each dosing, the initial drug-to-antibody ratio was fixed at 3.5. There was no pharmacodynamic component, which limited the model’s potential to compare alternate dosing regimens.
The prediction accuracy of the fitted model, based on a tally of successfully predicted observed values, met the minimum standard for the ADC analyte, but did not meet the standard of sufficient accuracy to predict the concentrations for either the payload or its primary metabolite. In general, the final population PK analysis is considered acceptable for the purpose of predicting exposure parameters of MIRV.
The recommended dose of Elahere is 6 mg/kg adjusted ideal body weight (AIBW) administered once every three weeks (21-day cycle) as an intravenous infusion until disease progression or the occurrence of unacceptable toxicity. Dosing based on AIBW reduces exposure variability for patients who are either underweight or overweight.
Dosing considerations include instructions to select patients for the treatment of platinum resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer with Elahere based on tumour FRα positivity using a validated test. Folate receptor-alpha positivity is defined as 75% or more of viable tumour cells with moderate (2+) or strong (3+) staining intensity by immunohistochemistry.
The clinical pharmacology data support the use of Elahere for the recommended indication. For further details, please refer to the Product Monograph for Elahere, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.
Clinical Efficacy
The clinical efficacy of Elahere was primarily evaluated based on the results of the pivotal Study 0416 (MIRASOL), a Phase III, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study that evaluated the use of Elahere as compared to investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [PLD], or topotecan; hereafter referred to as IC Chemo) in adult female patients with platinum-resistant advanced, high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers. All patients were required to have tumours with high expression of FRα (defined as 75% or more of viable tumour cells with moderate [2+] or strong [3+] staining intensity by immunohistochemistry). Each patient had received one to three prior systemic treatment regimens.
A total of 453 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the Elahere arm (total number [n] = 227) or the IC Chemo arm (n = 226). Patients in the Elahere arm were administered Elahere at a dose of 6 mg/kg (based on adjusted ideal body weight [AIBW]) every 3 weeks. Patients in the IC Chemo arm were administered one of four regimens: 1) paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) once every week with a 4‑week cycle, 2) pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m2) every 4 weeks, 3) topotecan (4 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks, or 4) topotecan (1.25 mg/m2) for five consecutive days every 3 weeks. In both arms, patients continued to receive study drug until disease progression, the occurrence of unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, death, or study termination by the sponsor - whichever came first.
Tumour response assessments were conducted every 6 weeks for the first 36 weeks and every 12 weeks thereafter. Randomization was stratified by the following factors: number of prior lines of therapy (one vs. two vs. three) and chemotherapy (paclitaxel vs. PLD vs. topotecan) chosen prior to randomization.
Of the 453 randomized patients, the median age was 63 years (range: 29 to 88 years); 66% were White, 12% were Asian, 3% were Black or African American, and 18% did not report their race. Most patients (80%) had ovarian cancer of epithelial origin; 11% had cancer of the fallopian tube; 8% had primary peritoneal cancer; and all (100%) were of high-grade serous histology. Nearly all patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 (55%) or 1 (44%). Fourteen percent of patients had received one prior line of systemic therapy, 39% of patients had received two, and 47% of patients had received three prior lines of systemic therapy. Sixty-two percent of patients received prior bevacizumab and 55% had received a prior poly adenosine diphosphate (ADP) ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor. The platinum-free interval following the most recent line of therapy was 3 months or less in 41% of patients, and 3 to 6 months in 58% of patients.
The primary efficacy endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary efficacy endpoints were investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). The evaluation of PFS and ORR was conducted according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST), version 1.1.
At the time of final PFS analysis and interim OS analysis, statistically significant improvements were demonstrated for both the primary endpoint of investigator-assessed PFS and the secondary endpoints of investigator-assessed ORR and OS.
The median PFS was 5.62 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 4.34, 5.95) in the Elahere arm compared to 3.98 months (95% CI: 2.86, 4.47) in the IC Chemo arm. The hazard ratio (HR) for investigator-assessed PFS was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.521, 0.808; p <0.0001), representing a 35% reduction in the risk of tumour progression or death in the Elahere arm.
The investigator-assessed ORR Investigator was 42.3% (95% CI: 35.8, 49.0) in the Elahere arm compared to 15.9% (95% CI: 11.4, 21.4) in the IC Chemo arm (p <0.0001). Of the responders, 12 (5%) were complete responses (CRs) and 84 (37%) were partial responses (PRs) in the Elahere arm compared to zero CRs (0%) and 36 PRs (16%) in the IC Chemo arm. With a median follow-up of 13.11 months and 204 of the 300 pre-specified target number of deaths (68%) observed, the median OS was 16.46 months (95% CI: 14.46, 24.57) for the Elahere arm compared to 12.75 months (95% CI: 10.91, 14.36) for the IC Chemo arm. The OS HR was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.504, 0.885; p = 0.0046), which represented a 33% reduction in the risk of death for patients treated with Elahere.
Indication
The New Drug Submission for Elahere was filed by the sponsor with the following proposed indication, which Health Canada subsequently approved:
Elahere (mirvetuximab soravtansine for injection) as monotherapy is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with folate receptor alpha (FRα)-positive, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, who have received one to three prior systemic treatment regimens.
Overall Analysis of Efficacy
Overall, the efficacy results of the pivotal study provide evidence of a statistically significant and clinically meaningful survival benefit for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients receiving Elahere.
For more information, refer to the Product Monograph for Elahere, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.
Clinical Safety
The clinical safety of Elahere was primarily evaluated in the pivotal Study 0416 (MIRASOL; described in the Clinical Efficacy section). Patients received Elahere 6mg/kg (based on AIBW) once every three weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The median duration of treatment was 5 months (range: 0.69 to 27.4).
Safety data were analyzed at the time of primary analysis. The median duration of dosing was 4.98 months (7 cycles) in the Elahere arm and 2.96 months (3 cycles) in the IC Chemo arm. In total, 210 patients (96%) treated with Elahere and 194 patients (94%) treated with IC Chemo reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade. The most common TEAEs (occurring with 20% incidence or higher) reported in patients treated with Elahere were blurred vision, keratopathy, abdominal pain, fatigue, diarrhea, dry eye, constipation, nausea, and peripheral neuropathy.
Ocular disorders, peripheral neuropathies, and pneumonitis were considered important identified risks associated with Elahere.
Ocular TEAEs were reported by 56% of patients receiving Elahere compared to 9% in the IC Chemo arm. In the Elahere arm, Grade 3 or higher ocular TEAEs occurred in 14% of patients. In a pooled safety analysis of 682 patients who received Elahere 6 mg/kg (based on AIBW), 59% reported at least one ocular TEAE. The majority of the ocular events were Grade 2 or lower in severity, with 73 patients (11%) experiencing a Grade 3 event and two patients experiencing Grade 4 events (less than 1%). Data for the pooled safety analysis was provided from four clinical studies (Study 0401 [a first-in-human study], and three Phase III Studies [Study 0403 {FORWARD}, Study 0417 {SORAYA} and the pivotal Study 0416 {MIRASOL}]).
In the pivotal study, peripheral neuropathy was reported by 37% of patients administered Elahere. Twenty percent (20%) of these events were Grade 1 in severity, 14% were Grade 2, and 4% were Grade 3. There were no Grade 4 events. In the pooled safety analysis, 36% of patients reported a peripheral neuropathy event, of which most were Grade 2 or lower (34%). Eighteen patients (3%) reported events Grade 3 or higher in severity. No Grade 4 or Grade 5 events occurred.
Pneumonitis was reported for approximately 10% of patients administered Elahere in the pivotal study, with most instances being Grade 2 or lower (90%) in severity. One patient reported Grade 3 respiratory failure and one patient experienced Grade 5 respiratory failure. In the pooled safety analysis, 10% reported a pneumonitis event including Grade 3 events (0.9%) and a Grade 4 event (0.2%).
In the pivotal study, serious adverse reactions occurred in 24% of patients treated with Elahere. The most common serious adverse events (occurring in 2% or more of patients) were pleural effusion (3%), abdominal pain (3%), intestinal obstruction (2%), ascites (2%) and small intestinal obstruction (2%).
Treatment-related fatal adverse events were reported for 7 patients (3%) in the Elahere arm. These included one case each of intestinal obstruction, dyspnea in the setting of subileus, neutropenic sepsis, cardiopulmonary failure, respiratory failure, ischemic stroke, and pulmonary embolus.
Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the approved Product Monograph for Elahere to address the identified safety concerns. A Serious Warnings and Precautions box describing the risk of severe ocular adverse reactions including blurred vision, keratopathy (corneal disorders), dry eye, photophobia, and eye pain has been included in the Product Monograph for Elahere.
Treatment with any therapeutic protein is accompanied by the risk of immunogenicity (the development of anti-drug antibodies [ADAs], which have the potential to neutralize the biological activity of the drug). Due to the limited number of patients with ADAs against MIRV in the pivotal study, no conclusions could be drawn concerning the potential effect of immunogenicity on overall safety.
Ocular disorders, peripheral neuropathy and pneumonitis are important safety concerns associated with Elahere treatment; however, these adverse events were generally manageable with the risk mitigation and dose modification measures implemented during the pivotal study. Overall, the results of the pivotal study provided evidence of a statistically significant and clinically meaningful survival benefit and an acceptable safety profile for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients receiving Elahere.
For more information, refer to the Product Monograph for Elahere, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.
7.2 Non-Clinical Basis for Decision
In humans, folate receptor alpha (FRα) is highly expressed in ovarian cancer cells while expression in normal tissue is limited. Target cells take up mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV), resulting in its processing to active maytansinoid catabolites and leading to induction of cell cycle arrest and cell death. The payload (DM4) and its main circulating metabolite (S-methyl-DM4) demonstrated strong cytotoxic potential in cell-based assays with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values in the low nanomolar range. In vivo, administration of a single intravenous dose of MIRV to immunodeficient mice bearing FRα-positive human ovarian carcinoma xenografts resulted in dose-dependent anti-tumor activity and extended survival of the animals.
The pharmacokinetic profile of MIRV in cynomolgus monkeys was biphasic and exposure metrics (maximum concentration [Cmax] and area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity [AUC∞]) for the antibody-drug conjugate and total antibody both generally increased linearly with dose. There were no apparent differences in pharmacokinetics between genders. The PK profile of MIRV in Dutch Belted rabbits was similar to that in monkeys.
Biotransformation of DM4 and S-methyl-DM4 is predominantly mediated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, with minor contributions of other CYP enzymes (2C19, 2C9). Overall, it is considered that the circulating levels of free DM4 derived from MIRV would be too low in patients for it to act as perpetrator in drug-drug interactions. However, the payload might be subject to drug-drug interaction as a victim. Accordingly, a potential for interactions with strong CYP3A inhibitors is included in the Product Monograph for Elahere. No other drug-drug interactions were identified from the data provided.
Toxicology findings were generally similar between single and repeat-dose studies and consisted of clinical dermal observations, effects on white and red blood cell pathology, and microscopic findings in the skin. Most of the findings reported in the toxicity studies had resolved by the respective recovery necropsies. Ocular toxicity studies in the rabbit reported ophthalmic findings of corneal microcysts, microscopic eye findings of slight attenuation, and degeneration/necrosis of the corneal epithelium. The severity of the ocular findings correlated with dose. At the three-week recovery necropsy, signs of recovery were noted for all of the findings.
The results of the non-clinical studies as well as the potential risks to humans have been included in the Product Monograph for Elahere. In view of the intended use of Elahere, there are no pharmacological or toxicological issues within this submission which preclude authorization of the product. Overall, the results of the non-clinical studies of MIRV support its use for the treatment of human cancer patients.
For more information, refer to the Product Monograph for Elahere, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.
7.3 Quality Basis for Decision
Characterization of the Drug Substance
The drug substance, mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV), is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of three components:
-
an anti-folate receptor alpha (FRα) chimeric monoclonal antibody of immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) subtype, covalently attached to
-
the small molecule anti-tubulin agent DM4 (a cytotoxic maytansinoid), via
-
the cleavable linker sulfo-SPDB ((N-Succinimidyl 4-(2-pyridyldithio)-2-sulfobutanoate).
The function of the monoclonal antibody component of MIRV is to bind to FRα expressed on the surface of ovarian cancer cells. Upon binding, MIRV is internalized and DM4 (the payload) is released intracellularly following proteolytic cleavage of the sulfo-SPDB linker. The small molecule, DM4, is a microtubule inhibitor that disrupts the microtubule network within the cell, resulting in cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death.
Detailed characterization studies were performed to provide assurance that MIRV consistently exhibits the desired characteristic structure and biological activity.
Results from process validation studies indicate that the processing steps adequately control the levels of product- and process-related impurities. The impurities that were reported and characterized were found to be within established limits. A risk assessment for the potential presence of nitrosamine impurities was conducted according to requirements outlined in Health Canada’s Guidance on Nitrosamine Impurities in Medications. The risk of the formation or introduction of nitrosamines during the drug substance and drug product manufacturing processes is considered negligible or low; therefore, no confirmatory testing is required. In addition, risk assessments for the potential presence of elemental and mutagenic impurities were conducted in accordance with International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines. No risks were identified with Elahere; therefore, no confirmatory testing or mitigation is required.
Manufacturing Process of the Drug Substance and Drug Product and Process Controls
Drug Substance
The drug substance, mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV), is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a monoclonal antibody intermediate, a sulfo-SPDB intermediate, and a DM4 (payload) intermediate.
Monoclonal Antibody Intermediate
The monoclonal antibody intermediate, mirvetuximab, is produced using a recombinant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line and standard monoclonal antibody manufacturing techniques. Cells from a cell bank are thawed and progressively expanded into vessels of increasing size to inoculate a production bioreactor. After the production bioreactor culture is harvested and clarified, mirvetuximab is subjected to downstream processing steps including chromatography, viral inactivation, and virus retaining filtration. Purified mirvetuximab is further concentrated and formulated by ultrafiltration/diafiltration. Formulated mirvetuximab is then filtered, filled into containers, and stored frozen.
Sulfo-SPDB intermediate
The sulfo-SPDB is a white to off-white powder. It is synthesized by a three-step linear chemical synthesis.
The manufacturing process was successfully validated with three process performance qualification (PPQ) runs that were carried out in accordance with a documented validation plan. Three consecutive sulfo-SPDB batches were produced at the commercial scale using different lots of starting material. The PPQ results demonstrate that the process operates consistently, is robust and reproducible, and generates sulfo-SPDB intermediate that meets the pre-determined specifications.
DM4 payload intermediate
The DM4 payload intermediate of the drug substance is chemically synthesized in a three‑step linear chemical synthesis.
Process validation reports for three commercial scale DM4 batches from multiple batches of the proposed regulatory starting materials were provided. As per Health Canada’s Quality (chemistry and manufacturing) guidance: New Drug Submissions and Abbreviated New Drug Submissions, given that there are no aseptic or sterilization processes in the DM4 drug payload manufacture, the reports have not been comprehensively reviewed as process validation and/or evaluation studies need not be provided in a regulatory submission. However, all critical and key process parameters for these batches were within predefined normal operating ranges and batches comply with DM4 specifications.
Antibody-Drug Conjugate
The mirvetuximab soravtansine ADC drug substance is produced through two sequential reactions involving the conjugation of mirvetuximab (the monoclonal antibody intermediate), the sulfo-SPDB linker intermediate, and the DM4 drug intermediate. The first reaction, an in-situ process, forms the drug-linker molecule. The second reaction, the conjugation step, attaches the drug-linker to mirvetuximab, yielding the ADC molecule. This molecule is then concentrated, purified, and formulated to 5 mg/mL mirvetuximab soravtansine in 10 mM acetate, 9% (w/v) sucrose, and 0.01% (w/v) polysorbate 20 at pH 5.0. Formulated bulk drug substance is then filtered and filled into bottles and frozen for long-term storage.
Drug Product
The drug product manufacturing process involves pooling bottles from a single drug substance batch, followed by sterile filtration and aseptic filling into vials, with no formulation steps. The resulting Elahere drug product is a concentrated solution for intravenous infusion that is sterile, preservative-free, clear to slightly opalescent, and colourless. It is supplied in 20 mL single-use vials at a strength of 100 mg. To ensure full withdrawal of 20 mL, the vials are overfilled. Prior to administration, Elahere must be diluted in 5% dextrose solution to achieve a final concentration of 1 to 2 mg/mL for intravenous infusion.
Process validation studies were conducted using at least three consecutive batches each of the monoclonal antibody intermediate, ADC drug substance, and Elahere drug product at the proposed commercial scales and manufacturing sites. Collectively, the process validation data demonstrated that the commercial manufacturing processes consistently produce monoclonal antibody intermediate, ADC drug substance, and Elahere drug product batches that meet predefined specifications and quality attributes.
During clinical development, different manufacturing processes and sites were used to produce the monoclonal antibody intermediate, ADC drug substance, and Elahere drug product. All processes were found to be comparable with respect to product quality and consistency, based on comparative analyses of lot release data, characterization studies, and stability results.
The materials used in the manufacture of the drug substance and drug product (including biological-sourced materials) are considered suitable and/or meet standards appropriate for their intended use. The method of manufacturing and the controls used during the manufacturing process are validated and considered to be adequately controlled within justified limits.
None of the non-medicinal ingredients (excipients) in the drug product are prohibited for use in drug products by the Food and Drug Regulations. The compatibility of mirvetuximab soravtansine with the excipients is supported by the stability data provided.
Control of the Drug Substance and Drug Product
Qualification of the mirvetuximab master cell bank was done in accordance with the relevant ICH guidelines and the results of these studies have confirmed its identity, sequence integrity, purity, and safety.
The drug substance and drug product are tested against suitable reference standards to verify that they meet approved specifications. Analytical procedures are validated and in compliance with ICH guidelines. Compendial methods were satisfactorily verified under conditions of use. The corresponding specifications were set using compendial guidelines, product and process knowledge, and statistical analyses of release and stability data. The established release and stability specifications are considered appropriate and in accordance with ICH guidelines.
A two-tiered reference program has been established for mirvetuximab and Elahere, respectively. The reference standards have been well characterized, and an appropriate program is in place to qualify new working reference material as needed in the future.
Elahere is a Schedule D (biologic) drug and is, therefore, subject to Health Canada's Lot Release Program before sale as per the Guidance for Sponsors: Lot Release Program for Schedule D (Biologic) Drugs.
Stability of the Drug Substance and Drug Product
Based on the stability data submitted, the proposed shelf life and storage conditions for the drug substance and drug product were adequately supported and are considered to be satisfactory. The proposed 60-month shelf life is acceptable when Elahere is stored between 2 °C to 8 °C, and protected from light.
The compatibility of the drug product with the container closure system was demonstrated through compendial testing and stability studies. The container closure system met all validation test acceptance criteria.
The proposed packaging and components are considered acceptable.
Facilities and Equipment
The design, operations, and controls of all facilities and equipment involved in the production are considered suitable.
Based on a risk assessment score determined by Health Canada, on-site evaluations of the drug substance and drug product manufacturing facilities were not deemed necessary.
All sites involved in production are compliant with good manufacturing practices.
Adventitious Agents Safety Evaluation
The monoclonal antibody intermediate manufacturing process incorporates adequate control measures to prevent contamination and maintain microbial control. Pre-harvest culture fluid from each lot is tested to ensure absence of adventitious microorganisms (bioburden, mycoplasma, and viruses) and appropriate limits are set. Purification process steps designed to remove and inactivate viruses are adequately validated.
Scaled-down models of the monoclonal antibody intermediate commercial manufacturing process were employed to evaluate the specific processing steps to remove and/or inactivate potential viral contaminants. Operational parameters used for the viral clearance evaluations represented worst-case scenarios relative to the manufacturing scale operating ranges. The study was performed in accordance with ICH Q5A. The level of clearance is consistent with ICH Q5A(R2) expectations and supports the viral safety of Elahere.
No materials of animal or human origin are used in the manufacture of Elahere except for the CHO-derived mirvetuximab production cell line. All raw and starting materials used in the manufacture of mirvetuximab cell banks, monoclonal antibody intermediate, drug substance and drug product have been assessed as negligible risk for transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) transmission. The excipients used in the drug product formulation are not of animal or human origin.
Related Drug Products
| Product name | DIN | Company name | Active ingredient(s) & strength |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELAHERE | 02560771 | ABBVIE CORPORATION | MIRVETUXIMAB SORAVTANSINE 100 MG / 20 ML |