Summary Basis of Decision for Lyrica
Review decision
The Summary Basis of Decision explains why the product was approved for sale in Canada. The document includes regulatory, safety, effectiveness and quality (in terms of chemistry and manufacturing) considerations.
Product type:
Lyrica
Pregabalin; 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 225, 300 mg, Capsule, Oral
Pfizer Canada Inc.
Submission control no: 088400
Date issued: 2007-10-30
Health Products and Food Branch
Our mission is to help the people of Canada maintain and improve their health.
Health Canada
HPFB's Mandate is to take an integrated approach to the management of the risks and benefits to health related to health products and food by:
- Minimizing health risk factors to Canadians while maximizing the safety provided by the regulatory system for health products and food; and,
- Promoting conditions that enable Canadians to make healthy choices and providing information so that they can make informed decisions about their health.
Health Products and Food Branch
Également disponible en français sous le titre : Sommaire des motifs de décision (SMD), LYRICA*, Pregabalin, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 225, 300 mg capsules Pfizer Canada Inc. No de contrôle de la présentation 088400
Foreword
Health Canada's Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) documents outline the scientific and regulatory considerations that factor into Health Canada regulatory decisions related to drugs and medical devices. SBDs are written in technical language for stakeholders interested in product-specific Health Canada decisions, and are a direct reflection of observations detailed within the evaluation reports. As such, SBDs are intended to complement and not duplicate information provided within the Product Monograph.
Readers are encouraged to consult the 'Reader's Guide to the Summary Basis of Decision - Drugs' to assist with interpretation of terms and acronyms referred to herein. In addition, a brief overview of the drug submission review process is provided in the Fact Sheet entitled 'How Drugs are Reviewed in Canada'. This Fact Sheet describes the factors considered by Health Canada during the review and authorization process of a drug submission. Readers should also consult the 'Summary Basis of Decision Initiative - Frequently Asked Questions' document.
The SBD reflects the information available to Health Canada regulators at the time a decision has been rendered. Subsequent submissions reviewed for additional uses will not be captured under Phase I of the SBD implementation strategy. For up-to-date information on a particular product, readers should refer to the most recent Product Monograph for a product. Health Canada provides information related to post-market warnings or advisories as a result of adverse events (AE).
For further information on a particular product, readers may also access websites of other regulatory jurisdictions. The information received in support of a Canadian drug submission may not be identical to that received by other jurisdictions.
Other Policies and Guidance
Readers should consult the Health Canada website for other drug policies and guidance documents. In particular, readers may wish to refer to the 'Management of Drug Submissions Guidance'.
1 Product and submission information
Brand name:
Manufacturer/sponsor:
Medicinal ingredient:
International non-proprietary Name:
Strength:
Dosage form:
Route of administration:
Drug identification number(DIN):
- 02268418
- 02268426
- 02268434
- 02268442
- 02268450
- 02268469
- 02268477
- 02268485
Therapeutic Classification:
Non-medicinal ingredients:
Submission type and control no:
Date of Submission:
Date of authorization:
* ™ C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V.
Pfizer Canada Inc., licensee
2 Notice of decision
On June 3, 2005, Health Canada issued a Notice of Compliance to Pfizer Canada Inc. for the drug product LYRICA*. LYRICA* contains the medicinal ingredient, pregabalin, which is an analgesic agent indicated for the management of neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia. LYRICA* (pregabalin) binds with high affinity to the alpha2-delta protein of brain tissues and demonstrates analgesic, antiepileptic, and anxiolytic activity.
The market authorization was based on data from adequate quality, preclinical, and clinical studies. In the controlled diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia clinical trials, LYRICA* was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing pain scores, sleep disturbance and improving Patient Global Impressions of Change (PGIC). Data from more than 8600 patients treated with LYRICA* demonstrate that LYRICA* can be administered safely when used under the conditions stated in the Product Monograph.
LYRICA* is contraindicated for patients who are hypersensitive to pregabalin or to any ingredient in the formulation or component of the container. Detailed conditions for the use of LYRICA* are described in the Product Monograph.
Based on the Health Canada review of data on quality, safety, and effectiveness, Health Canada considers that the benefit/risk profile of LYRICA* is favourable for the management of neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia.
3 Scientific and Regulatory Basis for Decision
3.1 Quality Basis for Decision
3.1.1 Drug Substance (medicinal ingredient)
Manufacturing Process and Process Controls
The drug substance, pregabalin, is synthetically derived. Materials used in the manufacture of pregabalin are considered suitable and/or meet standards appropriate for their intended use. The manufacturing process is considered to be adequately controlled within justified limits.
Characterisation
The structure of pregabalin is considered to be adequately elucidated and testing is in place to ensure chiral purity. Interconversion of isomers did not occur when stability samples were stressed and then tested.
Although impurities and degradation products arising from manufacturing and /or storage were reported and characterised, these were found to be within the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) established limits and therefore, considered acceptable.
Control of Drug Substance
Validation reports were submitted for all analytical procedures used for in-process and release testing of the drug substance, and to justify the specification of the drug substance.
Data from batch analyses were reviewed and considered to be acceptable according to the specification of the drug substance.
Stability
Based upon the real-time and accelerated stability study data submitted, the proposed shelf-life, storage and shipping conditions for pregabalin were supported and considered to be satisfactory.
3.1.2 Drug Product
Description and Composition
Each capsule of Lyrica contains 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 225, or 300 mg pregabalin; lactose monohydrate; maize starch; and talc. The capsule shells contain gelatin and titanium dioxide; the orange shells contain red iron oxide, and the white shells contain sodium lauryl sulfate and colloidal silicon dioxide. A manufacturing aid, colloidal silicon dioxide, may or may not be present. The markings on the capsules are in black ink, which contains shellac, black iron oxide, propylene glycol, potassium hydroxide and water.
Capsules are packaged in polyvinyl chloride (PVC)/aluminum blisters or high-density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles sealed with child-resistant closures.
Pharmaceutical Development
Changes to the manufacturing process and formulation made throughout the development are considered acceptable upon review.
Manufacturing Process and Process Controls
The manufacturing process is considered to be adequately controlled within justified limits.
Control of Drug Product
Lyrica is tested to verify its identity, purity, content uniformity, dissolution, and presence of degradation products, moisture, and impurities.
Although impurities and degradation products arising from manufacturing and /or storage were reported and characterised, these were found to be within the ICH established limits and/or were qualified by toxicology studies and therefore, considered to be acceptable.
Validation reports were submitted for all analytical procedures used for in-process and release testing of the drug product, and to justify the specification of the drug product.
Data from final batch analyses were reviewed and considered to be acceptable according to the specification of the drug product.
Stability
Based upon the real-time and accelerated stability study data submitted, the proposed 36 month shelf-life is considered acceptable when the product (packaged in PVC/aluminum blisters or HDPE bottles) is stored at 15-30°C.
3.1.3 Facilities and Equipment
The design, operations, and controls of the facilities and equipment meet Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) requirements and are considered suitable for the activities and products manufactured.
3.1.4 Adventitious Agents Safety Evaluation
A Certificate of Suitability from the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines has been provided which certifies that the gelatine meets European Pharmacopoeia (EP) criteria for products at risk for transmitting agents of animal spongiform encephalopathies.
3.1.5 Summary and Conclusion
This New Drug Submission is considered to meet the requirements of Division C.08.002 of the Food and Drug Regulations insofar as the Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) information is concerned.
The Chemistry and Manufacturing information submitted for Lyrica has demonstrated that the drug substance and drug product can be consistently manufactured to meet the specifications agreed upon. Proper development and validation studies were conducted, and adequate controls are in place for the commercial processes.
3.2 Non-Clinical Basis for Decision
3.2.1 Pharmacodynamics
Pregabalin performed well compared to other centrally acting drugs in a series of central nervous system tests. No potential safety issues or signals were identified. Pregabalin inhibited intestinal motility at 4-fold the maximum clinical exposure.
3.2.2 Pharmacokinetics
In vivo handling of pregabalin appears to be similar across the species studied (mice, rats, monkeys). Bioavailability was high, metabolism was limited, and excretion was predominately renal. Pregabalin was well absorbed, and was widely distributed into the body tissues with a volume of distribution that approximates total body water. High pancreas levels in rodents may relate to interactions with branched chain aminotransferase which is not found in monkey or man. Distribution to the eye does not suggest any special concern relating to targeting or accumulation.
Pregabalin does not appreciably bind to rat, monkey or human plasma proteins. Pregabalin crosses both the blood brain barrier (BBB) and placenta, and is also secreted into the breast milk of lactating rats. In vitro metabolism studies in cytosol, microsomes, and hepatocytes demonstrated that pregabalin was not appreciably metabolized. Also, in vitro human microsomal metabolic inhibition studies showed that pregabalin did not inhibit any of the major Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoenzymes that metabolize xenobiotics in humans.
3.2.3 Toxicology
Single-Dose Studies
Acute toxicity studies revealed no special hazard.
Multiple-Dose Studies
Multiple-dose studies in rats (4-52 weeks duration with high doses of pregabalin) showed hypoactivity; urine staining; tail dermatopathy; and atrophy of the pancreas, prostate, variable changes in the testis/epididymis; and hypocellularity of the bone marrow. Red blood cell levels increased while reticulocyte, megakarocytes, and platelet numbers decreased. There were no effects on the white blood cells. NOEL (No Observable Effect Level) was 50 mg/kg/day orally (PO) equivalent to 1.5-fold the maximum clinical exposure. In studies of up to 69 weeks duration, monkeys exhibited few clinical signs; predominantly tail sores (dermatopathy and erosions) and nasal discharge. There were no consistent blood changes. In monkeys, NOEL was 10 mg/kg/day PO equivalent to the maximum clinical exposure. The tail sores, although not directly relevant to man, are of some concern because of their severity and the low dose at which they occurred. The most obvious explanation is reduced blood flow to the extremities but this theory was not determined. Skin lesions in monkeys in the chronic study generally resolved before the end of the study.
Genotoxicity Studies
Pregabalin was non-genotoxic in a standard series of tests that used metabolic enzymes from both mouse and rat. These test results suggest that there were no genotoxic metabolites or intermediates in either species and the observed murine carcinogenicity was not genotoxic in origin.
Carcinogenicity Studies
The carcinogenic potential of pregabalin was evaluated with 2-year toxicology studies in rats and mice. Results showed no evidence of carcinogenic activity in rats. However, there was evidence of carcinogenic activity of pregabalin in two strains of mice based on demonstration of significant increases in incidences of hemangiosarcoma at several anatomical sites. Additional studies in mice showed that the initiating event for hemangiosarcoma occurred early following exposure (in the first year of exposure) and in the second year of exposure there seemed to be an accelerated rate of tumour development as evidenced by the higher rate in the continuously exposed mice.
The sponsor has conducted numerous additional studies with pregabalin to elaborate the possible mechanism of action in the causation of malignancy found in mice, but none of the studies have provided clear evidence for possible mode of action of the drug. It should be noted that pregabalin has no genotoxic activity, thus its mode of carcinogenic action is assumed to be epigenetic. In summary, because of the positive carcinogenic findings in mice, the carcinogenic potential of pregabalin for humans remains a matter of concern. However, since the carcinogenic activity of pregabalin has been demonstrated only in one species (mice) at relatively high systemic exposures (based on blood level comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters with those of humans) and not in a second species (rats), the potential carcinogenic risk of pregabalin exposure in humans is considered to be small.
Reproductive and Development Toxicity
Studies to assess the reproductive, prenatal and postnatal toxicity of pregabalin were conducted in rats; and embryo-fetal developmental studies were conducted in mice, rats, and rabbits. These studies were conducted in accordance with Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulations.
Test results showed evidence that pregabalin adversely affected the male fertility in rats by causing reduction in sperm counts and motility, and increased formation of abnormal sperm morphology. These effects were only seen at high doses, greater than or equal to 20 times the human dose equivalent, based on mg/m2 body surface area. The fertility of female rats was unaffected by pregabalin exposure.
It should be noted that at high doses, there was excessive embryo-fetal mortality. There was also evidence for developmental effects in rats when pregabalin was given during organogenesis to pregnant animals. These effects were characterized as enhanced ossification processes and they occurred at relatively high doses, approximately eight times the human equivalent dose. No major malformations were observed. Therefore, pregabalin is not considered teratogenic.
3.2.4 Summary and Conclusion
Pregabalin was shown to be effective in reducing pain-related behaviour in neuropathic animal models of diabetes, peripheral nerve damage or chemotherapeutic insult, and in models of musculoskeletal-associated pain.
Safety concerns from non-clinical studies were raised due to an increased incidence of hemangiosarcoma in mice. These results were found in mice but not rats. Rats showed some developmental effects (enhanced ossification) in males and females. Full disclosure of these findings and a warning that Lyrica should not be administered to pregnant women are stated in the Product Monograph.
3.3 Clinical basis for decision
3.3.1 Pharmacodynamics
Lyrica (pregabalin) is an analogue/derivative of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA, but does not bind to GABAa, GABAb or benzodiazepine receptors, nor is it an inhibitor of GABA uptake or degradation. Although the mechanism of action is not yet established, it appears that pregabalin interferes with GABA synthesis, and reduces the calcium-dependent release of several other neurotransmitters, including glutamate, noradrenaline, and substance P.
Pregabalin binds with high affinity to the alpha2-delta protein (a calcium channel subunit) of brain tissue. Reduction of the release of several neurotransmitters in vitro suggest a calcium channel blocking property for Lyrica. However, in contrast to vascular calcium channel blockers, pregabalin does not appear to alter systemic blood pressure or cardiac function.
3.3.2 Pharmacokinetics
Clinical studies were conducted to determine the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of pregabalin in humans, to assess the effects of drug dosing on pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, and to explore the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on PK parameters. Each study also collected data to assess the safety and tolerability of pregabalin. The clinical pharmacology program that defined the clinical pharmacokinetics of pregabalin consisted of 21 Phase 1 studies. All studies were conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practices, and were consistent with US, EU, and Japanese guidelines on drug development.
Following oral dosing, the clinical pharmacology of pregabalin was characterized by nearly complete absorption and negligible metabolism. Since pregabalin underwent negligible metabolism, urinary excretion of unchanged drug was the primary route of elimination. Pregabalin exhibited linear pharmacokinetics; drug exposure increased as the dose increased. Following repeated dosing, plasma pregabalin concentrations achieved steady-state in 24-48 hours. The pregabalin accumulation ratio ranged from 1.62-1.76 for q8h and was 1.40 following q12h dosing. The volume of distribution of pregabalin was similar to total body water. Results showed that pregabalin penetrated into red blood cells and did not appreciably bind to plasma proteins. Since pregabalin was not appreciably metabolized, did not inhibit CYP450 isoenzymes, and did not bind to plasma proteins, drug-drug interactions based upon metabolism are highly unlikely.
When the same total daily dose (600 mg/day) was administered q8h and q12h, mean drug exposure (AUC) and steady-state maximum concentration values (Cmax) were similar. Furthermore, as the q8h regimen diverged from an even 8-hour dosing interval to an uneven TID regimen (e.g., shortertime intervals between doses taken during the day and a longer interval between theevening and morning doses), the difference in the steady state values for Cmax and Cmin for q8h and q12h administration were further reduced. Therefore, pregabalin exposure is considered comparable, whether the total daily dose is divided into 2 or 3 doses.
Special Populations
Renal Impairment - Dose adjustments are required for patients with renal impairment. Since almost all of the systemically absorbed pregabalin is cleared unchanged by the kidney, the clearance of pregabalin is directly proportional to the creatinine clearance. Based on studies conducted in subjects with renal impairment, it is recommended that dosage adjustments be made according to renal function.
Liver Impairment - No dose adjustments are required for patients with hepatic impairment. Since the liver does not metabolize pregabalin to any appreciable extent, there is no basis for decreased clearance due to hepatic impairment.
Race - The pharmacokinetics of pregabalin in Japanese subjects were similar to those seen in US subjects. Results also showed that the relationship between daily dose and pregabalin drug exposure was also similar among Caucasians, Blacks, and Hispanics.
Gender - The relationship between daily dose and pregabalin drug exposure was similar between genders.
Age - A reduction in pregabalin dose may be required in patients with age-related compromised renal function. Results from healthy, elderly (>65 years) subjects showed increased pregabalin half-life and exposure, consistent with age-related changes in renal function. Results from premenopausal and postmenopausal women showed similar daily dose and pregabalin drug exposure.
Drug Interactions
Pregabalin pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly changed when administered with valproic acid, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, phenytoin, gabapentin, lorazepam, oxycodone, or ethanol. Additional population pharmacokinetic analyses also showed that carbamazepine, lamotrigine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, topiramate, tiagabine, valproic acid, oral hypoglycemic therapies, insulin, or diuretics did not significantly alter pregabalin pharmacokinetics.
Clinical pharmacology drug interaction studies have shown that pregabalin does not significantly change the pharmacokinetics of valproic acid, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, phenytoin, gabapentin, lorazepam, oxycodone, ethanol, or oral contraceptives (norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol). Population pharmacokinetic analyses also showed that the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine, lamotrigine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, topiramate, and valproic acid are not significantly changed with concomitant pregabalin.
Overall, doses of pregabalin and oxycodone; pregabalin and ethanol; and, pregabalin and lorazepam, whether administered alone or in combination, produced no clinically important respiratory suppression. Pregabalin appears to potentiate or be additive in the impairment of cognitive and gross motor function caused by oxycodone, ethanol, and lorazepam.
Safety
In the Phase 1 studies, pregabalin doses from 75 to 900 mg/day were generally tolerated by healthy subjects. The results of these studies supported further study in patients at doses up to 600 mg/day. The most frequently reported adverse events in clinical pharmacology studies were dizziness, somnolence, headache, stupor, thinking abnormal, asthenia, nausea, euphoria, amblyopia, abnormal gait, constipation, dry mouth, incoordination, and infection. Clinical laboratory test abnormalities were generally sporadic, transient, and considered to be unrelated to pregabalin administration. Overall, no clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities were observed. There were also no clinically important changes in blood pressure or heart rate.
3.3.3 Clinical Efficacy
Clinical data consisted of short-term, controlled, and long-term open-label trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pregabalin in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) or postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).
- Five DPN, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials included titration periods of 0-2 weeks and had fixed-dose durations of 4-11 weeks.
- Four PHN, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials included titration periods of 0-1 week with fixed-dose durations of 5-12 weeks.
Key enrollment criteria, design, methodology, safety and efficacy parameters were the same for the DPN and PHN studies. One exception was that patients in PHN studies were allowed to use a variety of analgesics concomitantly with the study drug whereas patients in DPN trials were only allowed to use standard and simple (over-the-counter) analgesics.
A total of 979 and 852 patients received various doses of pregabalin in the DPN and PHN trials, respectively. In the controlled DPN studies, there were a total of 319 elderly (>65 years) patients of whom 73 patients were >75 years of age. Similarly, in PHN trials, 661 patients were elderly of whom 379 (57%) were >75 years of age.
The primary efficacy measure was the end-point mean pain score, defined as the mean pain score from the last 7 pain diary entries while the patient was on study medication. Patients used a daily pain diary with an 11-point, numeric pain rating scale: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Other supplemental and secondary measures included by-week analysis of pain score data, responder rate (% of patients who achieved either >30% or >50% reduction in mean pain score at end-point vs baseline), Present Pain Intensity, sleep interference due to pain, Patient and Clinical Global Impression of Change (PGIC and CGIC), and Quality of Life Questionaire.
Pregabalin efficacy was established for DPN and PHN in the controlled clinical trials.
- In the DPN trials, primary efficacy measures in most pregabalin arms were statistically more significant (more effective) than placebo. Exceptions included the pregabalin 75 and 150 mg/day treatment arms. Efficacy data indicated a favourable trend towards dosing three times a day (TID) with a minimum effective dose or, at least, a starting dose of 150 mg/day. Doses from 150 to 600 mg/day (BID, twice a day; or TID), appeared to be similarly efficacious, with 75 mg/day being a non-therapeutic dose. Supplemental and secondary efficacy measures such as sleep interference due to pain, PGIC and CGIC were mostly positive and supportive of the primary end-point.
- In the PHN trials, study results showed a dose-dependent increase in efficacy in reducing pain. Whether administered as BID or TID regimen, pregabalin doses from 150 to 600 mg/day appeared to be similarly efficacious with 150 mg/day likely being the minimum effective dose or at least the starting dose. The pregabalin 75 mg/day was a non-therapeutic dose. With few exceptions, positive results of supplemental and secondary end-points such as responder rates, sleep disturbance due to pain, PGIC, CGIC and improvements in quality of life measures were supportive of the findings in primary efficacy outcome.
For both DPN and PHN studies, the minimum effective dose appears to be 150 mg/day in either a BID or TID regimen (pregabalin 75 mg/day is a sub-therapeutic dose). The therapeutic range is identified to be between 150 and 600 mg/day with the best combined safety and efficacy results obtained at 300 mg/day target dose. While the 300 mg/day dose appears to have the best efficacy/side effect profile, pregabalin 600 mg/day is associated with higher rates of adverse events and more frequent study discontinuations. Doses between 300 and 600 mg/day or >600 mg/day were not studied. Doses higher than 300 mg/day should be reserved for patients who can tolerate 300 mg/day well but do not experience satisfactory pain relief at this dose.
3.3.4 Clinical Safety
Clinical safety of pregabalin was studied in short-term controlled trials (5 in DPN and 4 in PHN), and long-term open-label trials. Information from the Periodic Safety Update Reports was also evaluated.
Controlled Trials
The controlled trials are described in Section 3.3.3 Clinical Efficacy. Safety was evaluated by the reporting of adverse events; physical, neurological and peripheral sensory exams; visual field and acuity screening; dilated ophthalmoscopy; and ECG and clinical laboratory tests.
Most Common Adverse Events - The overall profile and incidence of adverse events (AEs) in both DPN and PHN populations were similar with incidence rates being different from placebo starting at the low end of the therapeutic range (pregabalin 150 mg/day). While acknowledging that both populations, and especially PHN patients were mostly elderly, much higher reporting rates of dizziness (pregabalin 23% vs placebo 7%), somnolence (pregablin 14% vs placebo 4%), peripheral edema (pregabalin 10.4% vs placebo 2.9%), weight gain (pregabalin 4.2% vs placebo 0.4%) and amblyopia (pregabalin 4.4% vs placebo 2.0%) were noted in pregabalin-treated patients.
Serious Adverse Events - Overall, 2.5% of the patients in placebo arms experienced serious AEs compared to 3.6% in pregabalin groups. The most common serious AEs included chest pain, accidental injury, pneumonia, congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction. This pattern continued in the corresponding long-term trials. Despite some subtle differences, comparison of DPN and PHN trials did not reveal any particular trends in pattern or occurrence of various serious AEs that may be attributed to the specific patient population. There was a slightly higher reporting rate of peripheral edema in the pregabalin arms of PHN trials and this condition led to patient withdrawal more frequently in the PHN trials.
Discontinuations - Discontinuations were mostly dose-dependent and occurred in similar rates (25-30%) in pregabalin and placebo arms. However, 11% of the patients in pregabalin arms discontinued due to AEs (placebo, 5%). This was reversed for discontinuations due to lack of efficacy (pregabalin 4% vs placebo 8%). Dizziness was the most common AE leading to discontinuation in PHN trials (4.1% pregabalin, 0.8% placebo). Cases of peripheral edema that led to discontinuation were reported in 3.2% of the PHN patients that received 600 mg/day as compared to 0.3% for placebo. Also, regardless of pregabalin dose, renal-impaired patients experienced more AEs and discontinued trials more frequently. A warning statement for patients with renal impairment is documented in the Product Monograph.
Deaths - As of February, 2003, the integrated clinical safety database indicated 5 deaths in pregabalin arms (5/1556, 0.32%) vs one in placebo groups (1/764, 0.13%) of controlled clinical trials. Elderly PHN patients had the highest proportion of deaths at 1.7%.
Long-Term Trials
DPN Studies - The overall safety profile in long-term trials (1164 patients) was similar to the profile in the controlled clinical studies with the exception of weight gain that appeared to increase with long-term exposure and increased dosing. Overall, a 7% or greater increase in body weight was experienced by 21.5% of patients in the combined controlled and uncontrolled DPN studies. The most common AEs such as peripheral edema, accidental injury, somnolence and dizziness occurred at >8%. Weight gain was reported as an adverse event in 8.2% of patients in uncontrolled DPN studies. Approximately 13% of the patients in long-term studies discontinued due to AEs (e.g., nervous system-related events such as dizziness and somnolence) but peripheral edema was the most frequent individual AE leading to patient withdrawal at 1.3%.
PHN Studies - In the PHN studies (735 patients) an increased reporting of weight gain with long-term exposure to pregabalin was observed in the PHN population as compared to the control studies. The most common AEs were somnolence, dizziness, accidental injury, and peripheral edema (all >8%), mostly considered "related" to pregabalin treatment. Nearly 20% of the patients discontinued due to AEs that were mostly associated with the nervous system. Again, peripheral edema was the most common event leading to withdrawal (2.9%).
Compared to controlled studies, incidence of weight gain increased with long-term exposure to pregabalin and was observed across various pregabalin doses, with the weight gain increasing as the dose increased. Overall, a 7% or greater increase in body weight was experienced by 15.6% of patients in the combined controlled and uncontrolled PHN studies. In some trials, weight gain was one of the most common reported AEs at or above 13%. Weight gain was reported as an adverse event in 7.5% of patients in uncontrolled PHN studies. On average in the PHN trials, weight gain was experienced by 7.5% of the patients (placebo 0.3%). In many instances, weight gain was considered "related" to pregabalin treatment.
Periodic Safety Update Reports
The initial Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs) covered the reporting period July 07, 2004 to January 06, 2005 with an estimated clinical trial and postmarketing exposure of 464 and 15,000 patients, respectively. Patients ranged in age between 28 and 83 years.
Clinical Trials - Six cases of AEs were reported. Of interest was one case of "drug withdrawal syndrome" and one case of leg thrombosis. In both cases, based on the available information, the role of pregabalin could not be excluded.
Postmarketing Exposure - The most common AEs were dizziness, nausea, fatigue, and headache. The AE profile of pregabalin from the postmarketing dataset was similar to the profile from the clinical trials; edema (patients with or without history and ranging between 17-74 years), somnolence and vision-related AEs (diplopia and amblyopia, reduced acuity and accommodation disorders) were reported. AEs clearly associated with pregablin treatment such as peripheral edema, weight increase, vision-related AEs, dizziness and somnolence are listed in the WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS section of the Product Monograph.
3.3.5 Issues Outstanding
In recommending an NOC for pregabalin, the Central Nervous System Division has required a letter of commitment from the sponsor, committing to providing PSURs every 6 months for 3 years, with a special emphasis on monitoring tumorigenic potential, vision-related adverse events, peripheral edema, dizziness/somnolence, suicide-related events, and weight increase.
3.4 Benefit/Risk Assessment and Recommendation
3.4.1 Benefit/Risk Assessment
In Canada, there is currently no approved medication for the treatment of either diabetic neuropathy (DPN) or postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).
- DPN may have an acute onset and can cause moderate to severe nocturnal worsening pain. If this type of neuropathy persists for more than 12 months following onset, it may not spontaneously resolve and can last for many years. DPN does not respond well to treatment with simple analgesics and affects patient's quality of life.
- PHN can be a severe, unrelenting and very difficult type of pain to manage. Patients frequently report sleep disturbance due to pain. Incidence of chronic PHN is >50% in herpes zoster patients over 60 years of age and rises to >80% in patients over 80 years.
Based on current literature and expert opinion, Lyrica provides an acceptable level of efficacy and pain relief in both DPN and PHN patient populations. At this time, safety issues involving pregabalin treatment in these patients can be managed through labelling. As previously requested, the sponsor should provide, at regular intervals, updates and reports with respect to safety issues raised in this document and the core review. Following review of those data, appropriate Product Monograph labelling and/or action should be taken, if necessary
At this time, in light of combined safety and efficacy results in this NDS, and the fact that there is currently no approved drug in Canada for the management of either DPN or PHN, it is the judgement of this reviewer that the benefits of pregabalin treatment in patients with DPN or PHN outweigh the risks.
3.4.2 Recommendation
Based on the Health Canada review of data on quality, safety and efficacy, Health Canada considers that the benefit/risk profile of Lyrica is favourable for the management of neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia. The New Drug Submission complies with the requirements of sections C.08.002 and C.08.005.1 and therefore Health Canada has granted the Notice of Compliance pursuant to section C.08.004 of the Food and Drug Regulations.
4 Submission Milestones
Submission Milestones: Lyrica
| Submission Milestone | Date |
|---|---|
| Pre-submission meeting (pre-review meeting): | 2004-07-30 |
| Submission filed: | 2003-12-01 |
| Screening 1 | |
| Screening Acceptance Letter issued: | 2004-01-14 |
| Review 1 | |
| Quality Evaluation complete: | 2004-10-19 |
| Clinical Evaluation complete: | 2005-05-31 |
| Labelling Review complete: | 2005-06-02 |
| NOC issued by Director General: | 2005-06-03 |
Related Drug Products
| Product name | DIN | Company name | Active ingredient(s) & strength |
|---|---|---|---|
| LYRICA | 02268477 | BGP PHARMA ULC | PREGABALIN 225 MG |
| LYRICA | 02268418 | BGP PHARMA ULC | PREGABALIN 25 MG |
| LYRICA | 02268434 | BGP PHARMA ULC | PREGABALIN 75 MG |
| LYRICA | 02268450 | BGP PHARMA ULC | PREGABALIN 150 MG |
| LYRICA | 02268485 | BGP PHARMA ULC | PREGABALIN 300 MG |
| LYRICA | 02268426 | BGP PHARMA ULC | PREGABALIN 50 MG |