Summary Basis of Decision for Rukobia
Review decision
The Summary Basis of Decision explains why the product was approved for sale in Canada. The document includes regulatory, safety, effectiveness and quality (in terms of chemistry and manufacturing) considerations.
Product type:
Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) documents provide information related to the original authorization of a product. The SBD for Rukobia is located below.
Recent Activity for Rukobia
The SBDs written for eligible drugs (as outlined in Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision [SBD] Project: Phase II) approved after September 1, 2012 will be updated to include post-authorization information. This information will be compiled in a Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT). The PAAT will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada's decisions were negative or positive. The PAATs will be updated regularly with post-authorization activity throughout the product life cycle.
The following table describes post-authorization activity for Rukobia, a product which contains the medicinal ingredient fostemsavir (supplied as fostemsavir tromethamine). For more information on the type of information found in PAATs, please refer to the Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) Project: Phase II and to the List of abbreviations found in Post-Authorization Activity Tables (PAATs).
For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Guidance Document: The Management of Drug Submissions and Applications.
Updated: 2025-03-26
Drug Identification Number (DIN):
DIN 02520869 – 600 mg fostemsavir, tablet (extended-release), oral administration
Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT)
|
Activity/Submission Type, Control Number |
Date Submitted |
Decision and Date |
Summary of Activities |
|
SNDS # 280507 |
2023-10-31 |
Issued NOC 2024-03-27 |
Submission filed as a Level II – Supplement (Safety) to update the PM with new safety information. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable. As a result of the SNDS, modifications were made to the Microbiology section of the PM. An NOC was issued. |
|
SNDS # 271766 |
2023-01-26 |
Issued NOC 2023-05-19 |
Submission filed as a Level II – Supplement (Safety) to update the PM with new safety information. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable. As a result of the SNDS, modifications were made to the Warnings and Precautions section of the PM, and corresponding changes were made to Part III: Patient Medication Information and to the package insert. An NOC was issued. |
|
Drug product (DIN 02520869) market notification |
Not applicable |
Date of first sale 2022-04-26 |
The manufacturer notified Health Canada of the date of first sale pursuant to C.01.014.3 of the Food and Drug Regulations. |
|
NDS # 250213 |
2021-03-05 |
Issued NOC 2021-10-01 |
NOC issued for New Drug Submission. |
Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) for Rukobia
Date SBD issued: 2022-01-11
The following information relates to the New Drug Submission for Rukobia.
Fostemsavir (supplied as fostemsavir tromethamine)
Drug Identification Number (DIN):
- DIN 02520869 - 600 mg fostemsavir, tablet, oral administration
Viiv Healthcare ULC
New Drug Submission Control Number: 250213
On October 1, 2021, Health Canada issued a Notice of Compliance to Viiv Healthcare ULC for the drug product Rukobia.
The market authorization was based on quality (chemistry and manufacturing), non-clinical (pharmacology and toxicology), and clinical (pharmacology, safety, and efficacy) information submitted. Based on Health Canada's review, the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of Rukobia is favourable for use in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection for whom it is otherwise not possible to construct a suppressive anti-viral regimen due to resistance, intolerance or safety considerations.
1 What was approved?
Rukobia, an antiretroviral agent, was authorized for use in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection for whom it is otherwise not possible to construct a suppressive anti-viral regimen due to resistance, intolerance or safety considerations.
Rukobia is not authorized for use in pediatric patients (<18 years of age) as its safety and effectiveness have not been established in this population.
Clinical studies of Rukobia did not include sufficient numbers of patients aged 65 years and older to determine whether they respond differently from adult patients younger than 65 years of age.
Rukobia is contraindicated in patients who are hypersensitive to this drug or to any ingredient in the formulation, including any non-medicinal ingredient, or component of the container. Additionally, Rukobia is contraindicated in combination with strong cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A inducers as significant decreases in temsavir (the active moiety of fostemsavir) plasma concentrations may occur which may result in loss of virologic response. These drugs include, but are not limited to:
- Anticonvulsants, e.g., carbamazepine or phenytoin;
- Antineoplastics, e.g., mitotane;
- Androgen receptor inhibitors, e.g., enzalutamide;
- Antimycobacterials, e.g., rifampin; and
- St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum).
Rukobia (600 mg fostemsavir, supplied as fostemsavir tromethamine) is presented as tablets. In addition to the medicinal ingredient, each tablet contains colloidal silicon dioxide, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hypromellose, iron oxide red, iron oxide yellow, magnesium stearate, polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl alcohol, talc, and titanium dioxide.
Rukobia was approved for use under the conditions stated in its Product Monograph taking into consideration the potential risks associated with the administration of this drug product.
For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.
Additional information may be found in the Rukobia Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.
2 Why was Rukobia approved?
Health Canada considers that the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of Rukobia is favourable when used in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection for whom it is otherwise not possible to construct a suppressive anti-viral regimen due to resistance, intolerance or safety considerations.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is a retrovirus that targets the immune system. If left untreated, HIV-1 infection causes progressive CD4+ T cell loss and a wide range of immunological abnormalities that may ultimately lead to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Patients with AIDS have increased susceptibility to opportunistic infections and cancer. A cumulative total of 84,409 HIV cases have been reported to the Public Health Agency of Canada since reporting began in Canada in 1985. The most recent data indicates that 2,122 new cases of HIV-1 were reported in 2019.
In Canada, the current standard of care for treatment of HIV-1 infection includes combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), which aims to suppress viral replication to below detectable limits, increase CD4 T cell counts, and stop disease progression. Six classes of antiretroviral drugs are currently available in Canada that can be used for cART: nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), fusion inhibitors, and co-receptor antagonists.
Treatment failure can occur due to resistance to antiretroviral drugs, antiretroviral drug-associated toxicity and intolerability, as well as poor adherence to cART. It may lead to the selection of the HIV-1 virus resistant to multiple cART components and with cross-resistance to other antiretroviral drugs from the same class. Heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) patients in particular have limited remaining options from which to build a suppressive cART regimen and are consequently at high risk for AIDS-related morbidity and mortality. Although there are no firm estimates about the prevalence of HTE patients infected with multidrug-resistant (MDR) HIV, data from 2018 indicates that approximately 5.5% of Canadians on cART were not virologically suppressed.
Fostemsavir, the medicinal ingredient in Rukobia, is a first-in-class HIV-1 attachment inhibitor specifically developed for the treatment of HTE patients infected with HIV-1 who have no viable ART regimen due to multidrug resistance, intolerance, contraindication or other safety concerns. Fostemsavir is a prodrug which is hydrolyzed to the active moiety, temsavir, in vivo. Temsavir binds to the viral envelope glycoprotein gp120, preventing the entry of HIV-1 into host cells, thereby preventing infection.
The clinical efficacy and safety of Rukobia in the treatment of HTE adult patients with HIV-1 were primarily demonstrated through the results of the Phase III clinical study, BRIGHTE. At baseline, all enrolled patients had a viral load of 400 copies/mL or greater, and no more than two classes of antiretroviral medications remaining due to resistance, intolerability, contraindication, or other safety concerns. The BRIGHTE study was partially randomized, with patients enrolled in either a randomized or a non-randomized cohort.
Data from the 272 patients in the randomized cohort provided the primary evidence of efficacy. For the first eight days of the study, patients received either 600 mg Rukobia twice daily (203 patients) or placebo (69 patients), in addition to their current failing regimen. Beyond Day 8, all patients received 600 mg Rukobia twice daily (open-label), plus investigator-selected optimized background therapy (OBT). The primary endpoint analysis was based on the adjusted mean decline in HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) from Day 1 to Day 8 in the randomized cohort. Rukobia was found to be superior to placebo (adjusted mean declines of 0.79 log10 copies/mL versus 0.17 log10 copies/mL, respectively; p<0.0001, Intent-to-Treat-Exposed [ITT-E] population). At Day 8, greater reductions in the viral load were detected by various other measures in patients treated with Rukobia than in patients who received the placebo. Reductions in the viral load to levels below 40 copies/mL, 200 copies/mL, and 400 copies/mL were detected at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. Additionally, relative to baseline measurements, mean changes in the CD4+ cell count continued to increase over time.
Ninety-nine patients were enrolled in the non-randomized cohort who had no fully active and approved antiretroviral agents available at screening. These patients were treated with Rukobia 600 mg twice daily (open-label) and OBT from Day 1 onward. Reductions in the viral load to levels below 40 copies/mL, 200 copies/mL, and 400 copies/mL were detected at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. Additionally, relative to baseline measurements, mean changes in the CD4+ cell count continued to increase over time.
Virologic failure occurred in 25% and 51% of patients in the randomized and non-randomized cohorts, respectively, through analysis up to Week 96.
Eighty-one percent of adverse reactions reported with Rukobia were mild or moderate in severity. At the Week 96 analysis, 7% of patients had discontinued treatment with Rukobia due to an adverse event (5% of patients in the randomized cohort and 12% of patients in the non-randomized cohort). The most common adverse events leading to discontinuation were related to infections. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 3% of patients, and included three cases of severe immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). Adverse reactions of all grades that were reported in at least 2% of patients at the Week 96 analysis included nausea (9%), diarrhea (5%), fatigue, headache, rash (3% each), abdominal pain, vomiting, dyspepsia, IRIS, somnolence, and dizziness (2% each).
Twenty-nine deaths were reported during the study, including 18 deaths which were caused by events related to AIDS, IRIS, or acute infections, consistent with the advanced HIV disease of the study population.
Patients with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus co-infection at baseline had a higher incidence of elevations in hepatic transaminases which emerged post-baseline, compared to patients with neither co-infection.
Through Week 96, seven patients met the criteria for protocol discontinuation associated with prolongation of the corrected QT (QTc) interval (a QT interval corrected by Fridericia’s formula [QTcF] confirmed to be greater than 470 ms for female patients and greater than 450 ms for male patients). Six of the seven patients transitioned to the fostemsavir early access program in order to continue treatment. None of these patients experienced a corresponding symptomatic cardiovascular event or had any evidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia.
A Risk Management Plan (RMP) for Rukobia was submitted to Health Canada by Viiv Healthcare ULC. The RMP is designed to describe known and potential safety issues, to present the monitoring scheme and when needed, to describe measures that will be put in place to minimize risks associated with the product. At the time authorization, there were no RMP-related issues that would preclude the authorization of Rukobia.
The submitted inner and outer labels, package insert, and Patient Medication Information section of the Rukobia Product Monograph meet the necessary regulatory labelling, plain language, and design element requirements.
The sponsor submitted a brand name assessment that included testing for look-alike sound-alike attributes. Upon review, the proposed name Rukobia was accepted.
Rukobia has an acceptable safety profile based on the non-clinical data and clinical studies. The identified safety issues can be managed through labelling and adequate monitoring. Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the Rukobia Product Monograph to address the identified safety concerns.
This New Drug Submission complies with the requirements of sections C.08.002 and C.08.005.1 and therefore Health Canada has granted the Notice of Compliance pursuant to section C.08.004 of the Food and Drug Regulations. For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.
3 What steps led to the approval of Rukobia?
The drug submission for Rukobia was subject to an expedited review process under the Priority Review Policy. The sponsor presented substantial evidence of clinical effectiveness to demonstrate that Rukobia provides effective treatment of a serious, life-threatening disease which is not adequately managed by drugs marketed in Canada.
Rukobia is indicated for heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) adult patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, a unique subpopulation of patients for whom it is especially challenging to construct a viable treatment regimen. The data submitted from the Phase III pivotal study demonstrated that Rukobia, in addition to a current failing antiretroviral regimen, significantly reduced HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels in patients with HTE HIV-1. The durability of the virologic response and clinically significant increases in CD4+ T cell counts were demonstrated through Week 96 of the study. Based on these outcomes, the overall benefit/risk profile appears to be improved over existing therapies for patients with HTE HIV-1.
For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Management of Drug Submissions and Applications Guidance.
Submission Milestones: Rukobia
| Submission Milestone | Date |
|---|---|
| Request for priority status filed | 2021-01-29 |
| Pre-submission meeting | 2020-02-20 |
| Request for priority status approved by Director, Bureau of Medical Sciences | 2021-02-25 |
| New Drug Submission filed | 2021-03-05 |
| Screening | |
| Screening Acceptance Letter issued | 2021-04-06 |
| Review | |
| Non-clinical evaluation complete | 2021-09-24 |
| Quality evaluation complete | 2021-09-27 |
| Labelling review complete | 2021-09-29 |
| Clinical/medical evaluation complete | 2021-09-29 |
| Review of Risk Management Plan pending as of | 2021-10-01 |
| Notice of Compliance issued by Director General, Therapeutic Products Directorate | 2021-10-01 |
4 What follow-up measures will the company take?
6 What other information is available about drugs?
Up-to-date information on drug products can be found at the following links:
- See MedEffect Canada for the latest advisories, warnings and recalls for marketed products.
- See the Notice of Compliance (NOC) Database for a listing of the authorization dates for all drugs that have been issued an NOC since 1994.
- See the Drug Product Database (DPD) for the most recent Product Monograph. The DPD contains product-specific information on drugs that have been approved for use in Canada.
- See the Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c)-related documents for the latest fact sheets and notices for products which were issued an NOC under the Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c) Guidance Document, if applicable. Clicking on a product name links to (as applicable) the Fact Sheet, Qualifying Notice, and Dear Health Care Professional Letter.
- See the Patent Register for patents associated with medicinal ingredients, if applicable.
- See the Register of Innovative Drugs for a list of drugs that are eligible for data protection under C.08.004.1 of the Food and Drug Regulations, if applicable.
7 What was the scientific rationale for Health Canada's decision?
7.1 Clinical Basis for Decision
Clinical Pharmacology
Fostemsavir is a prodrug without significant biochemical or antiviral activity. Upon cleavage of a phosphonooxymethyl group in vivo, fostemsavir is hydrolyzed to the active moiety, temsavir, a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) attachment inhibitor. Temsavir binds directly to the gp120 subunit within the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp160 and selectively inhibits the interaction between the virus and cellular CD4 receptors. This prevents the attachment and subsequent entry of the virus into host cells, thereby preventing infection.
Following the administration of Rukobia, the pharmacokinetics of temsavir is similar between healthy subjects and patients with an HIV-1 infection. Fostemsavir is not generally detectable in the plasma following oral administration as it is hydrolyzed to temsavir by alkaline phosphatases within the small intestine. Under fasting conditions, temsavir is readily absorbed with a median time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) of 2 hours. Increases in plasma temsavir exposure, as measured by maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUCtau), appeared dose-proportional or slightly greater than dose-proportional, over the range of 600 mg to 1,800 mg of Rukobia.
In vivo data indicate that temsavir is approximately 88% bound to human plasma proteins. Human serum albumin is the major contributor to plasma protein binding of temsavir in humans. The free fraction of temsavir in plasma was approximately 12% to 18% in healthy subjects, 23% in subjects with severe hepatic impairment, 19% in subjects with severe renal impairment, and 12% in HIV-1-infected patients.
Temsavir is primarily metabolised via esterase hydrolysis (36.1% of administered dose) and secondarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-mediated oxidative pathways (21.2% of administered dose). Temsavir is extensively metabolised, accounting for the fact that only 3% of the administered dose is recovered in human urine and faeces. Following oral administration of 14C-labelled fostemsavir in a human mass balance study, 51% and 33% of the radioactivity was retrieved in the urine and faeces, respectively.
The terminal half-life of temsavir was approximately 11 hours. The plasma temsavir clearance rate following intravenous administration was 17.9 L/hr, and the apparent clearance (CL/F) after oral dosing was 66.4 L/hr.
Significant prolongation of the corrected QT (QTc) interval was observed following a supratherapeutic dose of Rukobia, corresponding to four times the recommended daily dose. Based on this finding, Rukobia should be used with caution in patients with a history of QTc interval prolongation. In addition, caution should be used when co-administering Rukobia with a drug with a known risk of Torsade de Pointes or in patients with relevant pre-existing cardiac disease. Elderly patients may be more susceptible to drug-induced QT interval prolongation.
The concomitant use of Rukobia with certain other drugs may result in known or potentially significant drug interactions. The co-administration of Rukobia with strong CYP3A4 inducers (e.g., rifampin) is contraindicated, as it may lead to loss of the therapeutic effect of Rukobia and the possible development of resistance due to reduced exposure of temsavir. The co-administration of Rukobia with inhibitors of CYP3A4, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), or breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) may increase temsavir exposure. A detailed description of important drug interactions can be found in the Rukobia Product Monograph. The potential for drug interactions should be considered prior to and during therapy with Rukobia, and patients should be monitored for adverse reactions associated with the concomitantly administered drugs.
Patients co-infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) at baseline had a higher incidence of post-baseline emergent elevations in hepatic transaminases as compared to patients with neither co-infection. Therefore, monitoring of liver chemistries is recommended in patients co-infected with HBV and/or HCV.
For further details, please refer to the Rukobia Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.
Clinical Efficacy
Evidence of the clinical efficacy of Rukobia was provided through the results of the partially randomized Phase III clinical BRIGHTE study, conducted in heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) adult patients with HIV-1. At baseline, all patients had a viral load of 400 copies/mL or greater, and no more than two classes of antiretroviral medications remaining due to resistance, intolerability, contraindication, or other safety concerns. The BRIGHTE study was double-blind, placebo-controlled, and partially randomized, with patients enrolled in either a randomized or a non-randomized cohort.
Randomized Cohort
Data from the 272 patients in the randomized cohort provided the primary evidence of efficacy. Patients in this cohort were taking a maximum of two fully active and available antiretroviral agents at screening, which could be combined as part of an efficacious background regimen. For the first eight days of the study, patients received either 600 mg Rukobia twice daily (number [n] = 203) or placebo (n = 69), in addition to their current failing regimen. Beyond Day 8, patients received 600 mg Rukobia twice daily (open-label), plus investigator-selected optimized background therapy (OBT).
The primary endpoint analysis was based on the adjusted mean decline in HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) from Day 1 to Day 8 in the randomized cohort. In the intent-to-treat exposed (ITT-E) population, Rukobia was superior with adjusted mean declines in HIV-1 RNA levels of 0.79 log10 copies/mL relative to 0.17 log10 copies/mL in the placebo group (p<0.0001).
At Day 8, 131 of the 203 patients (65%) who received Rukobia had a reduction in viral load greater than 0.5 log10 copies/mL relative to baseline, compared to 13 of the 69 patients (19%) who received the placebo. Ninety-three of the 203 patients (46%) who received Rukobia had a reduction in viral load greater than 1 log10 copies/mL, compared to seven of the 69 patients (10%) who received the placebo.
At Day 8, randomized patients with a baseline HIV-1 RNA level greater than 1,000 copies/mL achieved a median decline of 1.015 log10 copies/mL in viral load, while patients treated with the placebo had a median decline of 0.00 log10 copies/mL in viral load. Patients with a baseline HIV-1 RNA level of 1,000 copies/mL achieved a median decline of 0.14 log10 copies/mL in viral load, while patients treated with the placebo had a median decline of 0.06 log10 copies/mL in viral load.
There was considerable variability in the number of antiretrovirals (fully active and otherwise) included in OBT regimens. The majority of patients (84%) received dolutegravir as a component of OBT, of which approximately half (51% overall) also received darunavir with ritonavir or cobicistat. Virologic outcomes by ITT-E snapshot analysis at Week 48 were consistent with those observed at Weeks 24 and 96.
Based on the ITT-E snapshot algorithm, HIV-1 RNA levels below 40 copies/mL were achieved in 53% of patients at Week 24, 54% of patients at Week 48, and 60% of patients at Week 96. Levels below 200 copies/mL were achieved in 68% of patients at Week 24, 69% of patients at Week 48, and 64% of patients at Week 96. Levels below 400 copies/mL were achieved in 75% of patients at Week 24, 70% of patients at Week 48, and 64% of patients at Week 96.
Relative to baseline measurements, mean changes in the CD4+ cell count continued to increase over time with gains of 90 cells/mm3 at Week 24, 139 cells/mm3 at Week 48, and 205 cells/mm3 at Week 96. Results from a subgroup analysis indicated that over time, patients with the lowest baseline CD4+ cell counts (less than 20 cells/mm3) had a similar increase in the CD4+ cell count as patients with higher baseline CD4+ cell counts (greater than 50, 100, or 200 cells/mm3).
Non-Randomized Cohort
Ninety-nine patients were enrolled in the non-randomized cohort who had no fully active and approved antiretroviral agents available at screening. These patients were treated with Rukobia 600 mg twice daily (open-label) and OBT from Day 1 onward.
At Weeks 24, 48, and 96, the proportions of patients who achieved HIV-1 RNA levels below 40 copies/mL were 37%, 38%, and 37%, respectively, based on the ITT-E snapshot algorithm. At the same time points, the proportions of patients with less than 200 copies/mL HIV-1 RNA were 42%, 43%, and 39%, respectively, and the proportions of patients with less than 400 copies/mL HIV-1 RNA were 44%, 44%, and 40%, respectively. Relative to baseline measurements, mean changes in the CD4+ cell count increased over time (41 cells/mm3 at Week 24, 64 cells/mm3 at Week 48, and 119 cells/mm3 at Week 96).
Virologic Failure
Virologic failure is defined as:
- a confirmed HIV-1 RNA level of 400 copies/mL or greater after a prior confirmed suppression to fewer than 400 copies/mL;
- a confirmed HIV-1 RNA level of 400 copies/mL or greater at the last available measurement prior to discontinuation; or
- an increase in HIV-1 RNA level greater than 1 log10 copies/mL at any time above nadir level (40 copies/mL or greater)
Virologic failure occurred in 69 of the 272 patients (25%) in the randomized cohort and 50 of the 99 patients (51%) in the non-randomized cohort through the Week 96 analysis.
In the randomized cohort, 27 of 53 evaluable patients (51%) with virologic failure had treatment-emergent genotypic substitutions in the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 at the four key positions: S375, M426, M434, and M475. At virologic failure, the median fold-change in the half maximal effective concentration (EC50) of temsavir (the active moiety of fostemsavir) was 1,755-fold in the evaluable isolates with emergent gp120 substitutions and 3.6-fold in the evaluable isolates without emergent gp120 substitutions. Out of 69 cases of virologic failure in the randomized cohort, genotypic or phenotypic resistance to at least one drug in the OBT was detected in 21 (30%) cases at screening. Out of 64 cases of virologic failure with post-baseline data, emergent resistance to at least one drug in the OBT was detected in 31 (48%) cases.
The non-randomized cohort had a higher proportion of patients with emergent gp120 resistance-associated substitutions at the time of virologic failure compared to the randomized cohort. At virologic failure, the median fold-change in the EC50 of temsavir was 4,216-fold in the 33 evaluable isolates with emergent gp120 substitutions and 767-fold in the 12 evaluable isolates without emergent gp120 substitutions. Out of 50 cases of virologic failure in the non-randomized cohort, genotypic or phenotypic resistance to at least one drug in the OBT was detected in 45 (90%) cases at screening. Out of 49 cases of virologic failure with post-baseline data, emergent resistance to at least one drug in the OBT was detected in 27 (55%) cases.
Indication
|
Sponsor's proposed indication |
Health Canada-approved indication |
|
Rukobia (fostemsavir extended release tablets) is indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) adults. |
Rukobia (fostemsavir extended release tablets) is indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 for whom it is otherwise not possible to construct a suppressive anti-viral regimen due to resistance, intolerance or safety considerations. |
For more information, refer to the Rukobia Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.
Clinical Safety
The clinical safety of Rukobia was primarily established through data from the pivotal Phase III BRIGHTE study, described in the Clinical Efficacy section. In this study, Rukobia was generally well tolerated in the 370 patients (271 randomized and 99 non-randomized) who received at least one dose, with a dosing regimen of 600 mg twice daily.
The majority of adverse reactions reported with Rukobia (81%) were mild or moderate in severity. At Week 96, 7% of patients had discontinued treatment with Rukobia due to an adverse event (5% of patients in the randomized cohort and 12% of patients in the non-randomized cohort). The most common adverse events leading to discontinuation were related to infections which were reported in 3% of patients receiving Rukobia. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 3% of patients, and included three cases of severe immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). Adverse reactions of all grades that were reported in at least 2% of patients at Week 96 included nausea (9%); diarrhea (5%); fatigue, headache, and rash (3% each); abdominal pain; vomiting; dyspepsia; IRIS; and somnolence and dizziness (2% each).
An assessment of the long-term safety of Rukobia in the BRIGHTE study was confounded by the uncontrolled study design and the complex comorbidities and concomitant medications of the study population. The data provided with this submission covered a median follow-up period of approximately 100 weeks. The most commonly reported adverse events were diarrhea, nausea, and headache, the majority of which were Grade 1 or 2 in severity and resolved without interruption of study medication. Infection and the progression of HIV disease accounted for the majority of Grade 3 and 4 adverse events, serious adverse events, and deaths through Week 96. Approximately one third of patients experienced a serious adverse event, with pneumonia as the most commonly reported event.
Twenty-nine deaths were reported during the study, including 18 deaths which were caused by events related to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), IRIS, or acute infections, consistent with the advanced HIV disease of the study population. The median baseline CD4+ T cell count among the 29 patients was 11 cells/mm3. In the randomized cohort, the total number of class C AIDS-defining conditions (based on the Centers for Disease Control classification) decreased over time, with 22 events in the first 24 weeks, 9 events from Week 24 to Week 48, and 3 events from Week 48 to Week 96. Through Week 96, no new clinically relevant toxicities were identified due to emergent laboratory abnormalities.
Patients with HBV or HCV co-infection at baseline had a higher incidence of elevations in hepatic transaminases which emerged post-baseline as compared to patients with neither co-infection.
The observed treatment-emergent Grade 3 or 4 elevations in serum creatinine were confounded by advanced HIV disease and other comorbidities, as well as concomitant medications known to cause increases in serum creatinine without affecting renal glomerular function. Grade 3 elevations of direct bilirubin were also reported in the study and were similarly confounded by unrelated serious liver events, viral hepatitis co-infection, and/or other relevant medical history or concomitant medication. All other reported increases were minor, transient, and asymptomatic, and were resolved without interruption of treatment. Reports of adverse events of special interest included eight cases of IRIS, three of which were serious.
Through Week 96, seven patients met the criteria for protocol discontinuation due to prolongation of the corrected QT (QTc) interval (a QT interval corrected by Fridericia’s formula [QTcF] confirmed to be greater than 470 ms for female patients or greater than 450 ms for male patients). Six of the seven patients transitioned to the fostemsavir early access program in order to continue treatment. None of these patients experienced a corresponding symptomatic cardiovascular event or had any evidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia.
Adverse events within the Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders system organ class, including rash, were predominantly Grade 1 or 2 in severity and resolved with continued treatment with fostemsavir. One event of rash and one serious event of rhabdomyolysis were each considered related to fostemsavir. Both events resulted in permanent discontinuation from the study. A comprehensive review of creatinine phosphokinase elevations and musculoskeletal events in the study was conducted. The review showed that most of these events were Grade 1 or 2 in severity and resolved without interruption of treatment with fostemsavir.
Health Canada has determined that appropriate risk management measures are in place to address the safety concerns identified for Rukobia, and to promote its safe and effective use. Overall, the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of Rukobia is favourable for the approved indication. For more information, refer to the Rukobia Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.
7.2 Non-Clinical Basis for Decision
Fostemsavir is a prodrug without significant biochemical or antiviral activity. It is hydrolyzed in vivo to the active moiety temsavir, an HIV-1 attachment inhibitor. Temsavir binds to the gp120 subunit of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp160. This selectively inhibits interaction between the virus and cellular CD4 receptors, thereby preventing attachment, subsequent viral entry into, and infection of, host cells.
Repeat-dose toxicity studies were conducted for up to 26 weeks in rats and for up to 39 weeks in dogs. In rats, signs of testicular, renal, adrenal, and liver toxicity were observed at systemic exposures ≥30 times than the human clinical exposure from a 600 mg twice-daily dosing regimen. Liver toxicity was also reported in dogs at systemic exposures 3 times or greater than the human clinical exposure. The majority of the observed adverse effects were duration-dependent and reversible.
Carcinogenicity studies were conducted in rats for two years and in transgenic mice for 26 weeks. No statistically significant increases in tumours were observed in animals treated with fostemsavir relative to controls. Compared to exposure levels in humans at the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD), the maximum daily exposures were approximately five times greater and 16 times greater in male and female rats, respectively.
Fostemsavir was not found to be genotoxic in a bacterial reverse mutation assay, a chromosome aberration test in human lymphocytes, or a rat bone marrow micronucleus test.
No adverse effects were observed on male or female fertility in rats at exposure levels ≥100 times greater than the human clinical exposure from a 600 mg twice-daily dosing regimen. Reproductive toxicity studies in pregnant rats and rabbits showed that temsavir crosses the placenta and can be detected in fetal tissue. No adverse embryo-fetal developmental outcomes were observed following oral administration of fostemsavir at the MRHD; however, in pregnant rats, fetal abnormalities and reductions in fetal body weight were observed in the presence of maternal toxicity at exposure levels ≥200 times the predicted human exposure at the MRHD. In rabbits, decreases in fetal body weights and embryonic deaths were observed at exposure levels ≥65 times the exposure at the MRHD, and exposure levels ≥100 times the exposure at MRHD resulted in abortions in the presence of severe maternal toxicity. In a pre- and postnatal development study in rats, lactational exposure to fostemsavir was associated with reduced neonatal survival from post-natal Days 7 to 14 at exposure levels ≥100 times the human exposure at 600 mg twice daily.
Based on the outcomes of the non-clinical studies, Rukobia should not be used in pregnant women unless the potential benefits outweigh the potential risks to the fetus. As temsavir is expected to be present in breast milk, mothers with an HIV-1 infection should be advised to not breastfeed if they are being treated with Rukobia. Where possible, mothers with an HIV-1 infection should not breastfeed their infants to avoid the risk of postnatal transmission of HIV.
The results of the non-clinical studies as well as the potential risks to humans have been included in the Rukobia Product Monograph. Considering the intended use of Rukobia, there are no pharmacological or toxicological issues within this submission which preclude authorization of the product.
For more information, refer to the Rukobia Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.
7.3 Quality Basis for Decision
The Chemistry and Manufacturing information submitted for Rukobia has demonstrated that the drug substance and drug product can be consistently manufactured to meet the approved specifications. Proper development and validation studies were conducted, and adequate controls are in place for the commercial processes. Changes to the manufacturing process and formulation made throughout the pharmaceutical development are considered acceptable upon review. Based on the stability data submitted, the proposed shelf life of 24 months is acceptable when the drug product is stored at room temperature (15 ºC to 25 ºC).
Proposed limits of drug-related impurities are considered adequately qualified (i.e. within International Council for Harmonisation [ICH] limits and/or qualified from toxicological studies).
All sites involved in production are compliant with Good Manufacturing Practices.
None of the non-medicinal ingredients (excipients) found in the drug product are prohibited by the Food and Drug Regulations.
None of the excipients used in the formulation of Rukobia are of human or animal origin.
Related Drug Products
| Product name | DIN | Company name | Active ingredient(s) & strength |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUKOBIA | 02520869 | VIIV HEALTHCARE ULC | FOSTEMSAVIR (FOSTEMSAVIR TROMETHAMINE) 600 MG |