Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) for Opdualag

Review decision

The Summary Basis of Decision explains why the product was approved for sale in Canada. The document includes regulatory, safety, effectiveness and quality (in terms of chemistry and manufacturing) considerations.


Product type:

Drug
Summary Basis of Decision (SBD)

Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) documents provide information related to the original authorization of a product. The SBD for Opdualag is located below.

Recent Activity for Opdualag

The SBDs written for eligible drugs (as outlined in Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision [SBD] Project: Phase II) approved after September 1, 2012 will be updated to include post-authorization information. This information will be compiled in a Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT). The PAAT will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada's decisions were negative or positive. The PAATs will be updated regularly with post-authorization activity throughout the product life cycle.

The following table describes post-authorization activity for Opdualag, a product which contains the medicinal ingredients nivolumab and relatlimab. For more information on the type of information found in PAATs, please refer to the Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) Project: Phase II and to the List of abbreviations found in Post-Authorization Activity Tables (PAATs).

For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Guidance Document: The Management of Drug Submissions and Applications.

Updated: 2025-02-24

Drug Identification Number (DIN):

DIN 02541416 – 240mg Nivolumab/20ml, 80mg relatlimab/20ml, solution, intravenous administration

Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT)

Activity/Submission Type, Control Number

Date Submitted

Decision and Date

Summary of Activities

NC # 291511

2024-10-21

Issued NOL

2025-01-08

Submission filed as a Level II (90 day) Notifiable Change (Moderate Quality Changes) for change in cell bank/seed bank manufacturing site and change in the controls (in-process tests and/or acceptance criteria) applied during the drug substance manufacturing process or on intermediates. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable, and an NOL was issued.

NC # 290360

2024-09-13

Issued NOL

2024-11-05

Submission filed as a Level II (90 day) Notifiable Change (Moderate Quality Changes) for a change in cell bank/seed bank manufacturing site. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable, and an NOL was issued.

NC # 289059

2024-07-26

Issued NOL

2024-09-18

Submission filed as a Level II (90 day) Notifiable Change (Moderate Quality Changes) for a change in the drug substance release or shelf-life specifications. The submission was reviewed and considered acceptable, and an NOL was issued.

Drug product (DIN 02541416) market notification

Not applicable

Date of first sale 2024-02-12

The manufacturer notified Health Canada of the date of first sale pursuant to C.01.014.3 of the Food and Drug Regulations.

NDS # 256629

2022-06-01

Issued NOC 2023-09-13

NOC issued for New Drug Submission.

Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) for Opdualag

Date SBD issued: 2023-12-21

The following information relates to the New Drug Submission for Opdualag.

Nivolumab and relatlimab

Drug Identification Number (DIN): DIN 02541416 – nivolumab 240 mg/20 mL (12 mg/mL) and relatlimab 80 mg/20 mL (4 mg/mL), solution, intravenous administration

Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada

New Drug Submission Control Number: 256629

Submission Type: New Drug Submission (New Active Substance)

Therapeutic Area (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] Classification, second level): L01 Antineoplastic agents

Date Filed: 2022-06-01

Authorization Date: 2023-09-13

On September 13, 2023, Health Canada issued a Notice of Compliance to Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada for the drug product Opdualag.

The market authorization was based on quality (chemistry and manufacturing), non‑clinical (pharmacology and toxicology), and clinical (pharmacology, safety, and efficacy) information submitted. Based on Health Canada’s review, the benefit‑risk profile of Opdualag is favourable for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years of age or older with unresectable or metastatic melanoma who have not received prior systemic therapy for unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

1 What was approved?

Opdualag, an antineoplastic agent, was authorized for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years of age or older with unresectable or metastatic melanoma who have not received prior systemic therapy for unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

The efficacy and safety of Opdualag have not been established in pediatric patients younger than 12 years of age. Therefore, Health Canada has not authorized the use of Opdualag in this pediatric population.

Of the 355 patients treated with Opdualag in the Phase II/III trial CA224047 (described in the Clinical Efficacy section), 47% of patients were 65 years of age or older, and 19% of patients were 75 years of age or older. No overall differences in safety or effectiveness were observed between patients 65 years of age and older and those younger than 65 years of age.

Opdualag (nivolumab 240 mg/20 mL [12 mg/mL] and relatlimab 80 mg/20 mL [4 mg/mL]) is presented as a solution in a single-use vial. In addition to nivolumab (12 mg) and relatlimab (4 mg), each mL of Opdualag solution contains histidine (1.1 mg), L-histidine hydrochloride monohydrate (2.7 mg), sucrose (85.6 mg), pentetic acid (0.008 mg), polysorbate 80 (0.5 mg), and water for injection.

The use of Opdualag is contraindicated in patients who are hypersensitive to nivolumab or relatlimab or to any ingredient in the formulation, including any non-medicinal ingredient, or component of the container.

The drug product was approved for use under the conditions stated in its Product Monograph taking into consideration the potential risks associated with its administration. The Opdualag Product Monograph is available through the Drug Product Database.

For more information about the rationale for Health Canada's decision, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

2 Why was Opdualag approved?

Health Canada considers that the benefit-risk profile of Opdualag is favourable for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years of age or older with unresectable or metastatic melanoma who have not received prior systemic therapy for unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

Melanoma, a cancer which originates from melanocytes, is the most lethal form of skin cancer due to its propensity to metastasize to various organs. According to the Canadian Cancer Society, in 2022, 9,000 Canadians were estimated to be diagnosed with melanoma skin cancer and 1,200 Canadians were estimated to die from the disease. The risk of developing melanoma increases with age. In children, melanoma is rare. Advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma carries a poor prognosis; however, the advent of molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapies have drastically altered the treatment landscape and increased survival in patients with unresectable or metastatic disease.

Opdualag is a fixed-dose combination of two immune checkpoint inhibitors, nivolumab and relatlimab. Nivolumab (Opdivo) has been authorized in Canada for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Nivolumab is a human immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) monoclonal antibody that binds to the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor on T cells and blocks its interaction with its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, expressed on tumour cells, thereby reducing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response. Relatlimab is a human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds to the lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) receptor on T cells, blocks its interaction with ligands, including major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II molecules, and reduces LAG-3 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response. The combination of nivolumab and relatlimab results in increased T-cell activation compared to the activity of either antibody alone.

The market authorization of Opdualag was based on the efficacy and safety data derived from a randomized, double-blind, Phase II/III trial (CA224047) in adult patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive Opdualag (nivolumab 480 mg and relatlimab 160 mg) by intravenous infusion every 4 weeks (355 patients) or nivolumab 480 mg by intravenous infusion every 4 weeks (359 patients). After a median follow-up of 13.2 months, the study results showed a statistically significant improvement in the primary efficacy endpoint of progression-free survival in patients randomized to the Opdualag arm compared with those randomized to the nivolumab arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62, 0.92; p = 0.0055). The median progression-free survival was 10.1 months (95% CI: 6.4, 15.7) for the Opdualag arm compared to 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.4, 5.6) for the nivolumab arm, representing an improvement of 5.5 months in median progression-free survival. The result of the final analysis of overall survival appears to be favourable for Opdualag but was not statistically significant (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64, 1.01). A higher percentage of patients in the Opdualag arm (43%) achieved an objective response compared with patients in the nivolumab arm (33%). Thus, Opdualag demonstrated a clinical benefit over nivolumab, which is a currently authorized treatment for unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

Safety data indicate that the safety profile of Opdualag is generally consistent with that of other immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. The most frequently reported adverse reactions in patients treated with Opdualag (occurring with an incidence of 15% or greater) were fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, rash, pruritus, arthralgia, diarrhea, headache, nausea, hypothyroidism, cough, and decreased appetite. Severe, and in some cases fatal, immune-mediated adverse reactions were reported to occur with Opdualag. This risk has been highlighted in a Serious Warnings and Precautions box in the Opdualag Product Monograph. Recommendations for the management of immune-mediated adverse reactions have also been included in the Opdualag Product Monograph.

Given that no pediatric patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic melanoma were enrolled in the pivotal clinical trial CA224047, the benefit-risk profile of Opdualag in pediatric patients aged 12 to under 18 years was extrapolated from the data in the adult study population. The extrapolation was justified by the similarities between adult and adolescent patients in the disease course of unresectable or metastatic melanoma and the pharmacokinetics of nivolumab and relatlimab. The results of population pharmacokinetic analyses indicate that no clinically meaningful differences in the exposure of nivolumab and relatlimab are expected between adults and pediatric patients 12 years of age or older and weighing at least 40 kg, at the recommended dose. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of Opdualag are expected to be similar in adults and adolescents. The efficacy and safety of Opdualag have not been established in pediatric patients younger than 12 years of age or in patients 12 years of age or older who weigh less than 40 kg. In the post-marketing setting, a long-term follow-up of pediatric patients with melanoma exposed to Opdualag in the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry is planned. Furthermore, a prospective clinical study in pediatric patients with Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is expected to provide additional insight into the safety profile of the nivolumab and relatlimab combination in the pediatric population.

A Risk Management Plan (RMP) for Opdualag was submitted by Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada to Health Canada. The RMP is designed to describe known and potential safety issues, to present the monitoring scheme and when needed, to describe measures that will be put in place to minimize risks associated with the product. Upon review, the RMP was considered to be acceptable.

The submitted inner and outer labels, package insert, and Patient Medication Information section of the Opdualag Product Monograph met the necessary regulatory labelling, plain language, and design element requirements.

The sponsor submitted a brand name assessment that included testing for look‑alike sound‑alike attributes. Upon review, the proposed name Opdualag was accepted.

Overall, based on the data submitted, the benefit of Opdualag as a first-line treatment option for adults and pediatric patients 12 years of age or older with unresectable or metastatic melanoma is considered to outweigh the risks associated with the use of this product. The identified safety issues can be managed through labelling and adequate monitoring. Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the Opdualag Product Monograph to address the identified safety concerns.

This New Drug Submission complies with the requirements of sections C.08.002 and C.08.005.1 and therefore Health Canada has issued the Notice of Compliance pursuant to section C.08.004 of the Food and Drug Regulations. For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

3 What steps led to the approval of Opdualag?

The review of the quality, non-clinical, and clinical components of the New Drug Submission (NDS) for Opdualag was based on a critical assessment of the data package submitted to Health Canada. The reviews completed by the European Medicines Agency, the United States Food and Drug Administration, and Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration were used as added references, as per Method 3 described in the Draft Guidance Document: The Use of Foreign Reviews by Health Canada. The Canadian regulatory decision on the Opdualag NDS was made independently based on the Canadian review.

For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Guidance Document: The Management of Drug Submissions and Applications.

Submission Milestones: Opdualag

Submission Milestone

Date

New Drug Submission filed

2022-06-01

Screening

Screening Deficiency Notice issued

2022-07-20

Response to Screening Deficiency Notice filed

2022-08-30

Screening Acceptance Letter issued

2022-09-13

Review

Two requests were granted to pause review clock (extensions to respond to clarification requests)

65 days in total

Review of Risk Management Plan completed

2023-08-14

Quality evaluation completed

2023-08-25

Non-clinical evaluation completed

2023-09-06

Clinical/medical evaluation completed

2023-09-11

Labelling review completed

2023-09-12

Notice of Compliance issued by Director General, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate

2023-09-13

4 What follow-up measures will the company take?

Requirements for post-market commitments are outlined in the Food and Drugs Act and Food and Drug Regulations.

5 What post-authorization activity has taken place for Opdualag?

Summary Basis of Decision documents (SBDs) for eligible drugs (as outlined in Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision [SBD] Project: Phase II) authorized after September 1, 2012 will include post-authorization information in a table format. The Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT) will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada’s decisions were negative or positive. The PAAT will continue to be updated during the product life cycle.

The PAAT for Opdualag is found above.

For the latest advisories, warnings and recalls for marketed products, see MedEffect Canada.

6 What other information is available about drugs?

Up-to-date information on drug products can be found at the following links:

7 What was the scientific rationale for Health Canada's decision?
7.1 Clinical Basis for Decision

Clinical Pharmacology

Opdualag is a fixed-dose combination of two immune checkpoint inhibitors, nivolumab and relatlimab.

The submitted population pharmacokinetic studies characterized the pharmacokinetics of nivolumab and relatlimab, compared key measures of nivolumab and relatlimab exposures among different dosing regimens, and characterized the relationship between relatlimab concentrations and biomarkers, efficacy, and safety in patients with advanced solid tumours. In addition, these studies provided the basis for extrapolating the efficacy and safety data for the fixed-dose combination of nivolumab and relatlimab in adults with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma to pediatric patients aged 12 years and older with advanced melanoma.

Following the recommended dosage regimen of 480 mg nivolumab and 160 mg relatlimab every 4 weeks, steady-state concentrations of relatlimab were reached by 16 weeks with 1.9-fold systemic accumulation.

Body weight was a significant covariate on the nivolumab and relatlimab pharmacokinetics. However, the difference in exposure among patients with varying body weights was not deemed clinically relevant. No evidence suggested that efficacy and safety of Opdualag were affected in patients with extremely high or low body weights.

Mild and moderate hepatic or renal impairment had no clinically important effect on the clearance of nivolumab and relatlimab. The number of patients with severe hepatic or renal impairment was too small to permit evaluation of the effect of these conditions on the pharmacokinetics of nivolumab and relatlimab.

The presence of anti-drug antibodies did not appear to have a clinically relevant impact on the efficacy and safety of relatlimab.

A flat exposure-response relationship was observed over a range of nivolumab and relatlimab concentrations produced by different dosing regimens. The addition of relatlimab to nivolumab treatment significantly increased progression-free survival and objective response compared to nivolumab monotherapy. The exposure-response safety analyses showed that the combination of nivolumab and relatlimab significantly increased the risks of Grade 2 or higher immune-mediated adverse events and Grade 3 or higher drug-related adverse events compared to nivolumab monotherapy. The increase in risks of these adverse events was similar across the range of relatlimab exposures produced by the combination dosing regimens studied.

Although the pivotal clinical trial CA224047 allowed for enrollment of patients 12 years of age or older, no pediatric patients were enrolled. Therefore, the benefit-risk profile of Opdualag in pediatric patients 12 years of age or older was extrapolated from the data in the adult study population. The extrapolation was justified by the similarities between adult and adolescent patients in the disease course of unresectable or metastatic melanoma and the pharmacokinetics of nivolumab and relatlimab.

A population pharmacokinetics-based extrapolation study was performed to support the recommended dose of Opdualag in adolescents aged 12 to under 18 years, using a model-based simulation. Relatlimab pharmacokinetic data in the adolescent population were not available. Given the overall similarity in the pharmacokinetic characteristics of nivolumab and relatlimab, the available data on nivolumab clearance in adolescent patients were used to predict relatlimab clearance in this patient population. At the recommended dose of Opdualag, no clinically meaningful differences in the exposure of nivolumab and relatlimab are expected between adults and pediatric patients 12 years of age or older and weighing at least 40 kg; therefore, the efficacy and safety of Opdualag are expected to be similar in adults and adolescents.

For further details, please refer to the Opdualag Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Efficacy

The clinical efficacy of Opdualag was evaluated based on the results of the pivotal trial CA224047, a randomized, double-blind, Phase II/III study in patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic melanoma. While the study design allowed for inclusion of pediatric patients 12 years of age or older, there were no pediatric patients enrolled. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive Opdualag (nivolumab 480 mg and relatlimab 160 mg) by intravenous infusion every 4 weeks (355 patients) or nivolumab 480 mg by intravenous infusion every 4 weeks (359 patients). Randomization was stratified by tumour programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression levels (≥1% versus <1%), LAG-3 expression levels (≥1% versus <1%), BRAF (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) V600 mutation status (BRAF V600 mutation-positive versus BRAF wild-type tumour), and M (distant metastasis) stage per the American Joint Committee on Cancer version 8 staging system (M0 with either normal or elevated lactate dehydrogenase [LDH] and all M1 with normal LDH [0] versus all M1 with elevated LDH only [1]).

The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival assessed by a blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints included overall survival and objective response rate. At the primary analysis of progression-free survival, after a median follow-up of 13.2 months, a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival was demonstrated for patients randomized to the Opdualag arm compared with those randomized to the nivolumab arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62, 0.92; p = 0.0055). The median progression-free survival was 10.1 months (95% CI: 6.4, 15.7) for the Opdualag arm compared to 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.4, 5.6) for the nivolumab arm, representing an improvement of 5.5 months in median progression-free survival. The result of the final analysis of overall survival, after a median follow-up of 19.9 months, was not statistically significant (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64, 1.01). Median overall survival was not reached (95% CI: 34.2, not reached [NR]) in the Opdualag arm, and it was 34.1 months (95% CI: 25.2, NR) in the nivolumab arm. A higher percentage of patients in the Opdualag arm (43% [95% CI: 38, 48]) achieved objective response compared with the nivolumab arm (33% [95% CI: 28, 38]).

In an exploratory analysis of progression-free survival for the subgroups defined by the tumour PD-L1 expression levels (≥1% versus <1%), the HRs were 0.95 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.33) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.51, 0.84), respectively. While these results suggest a potential increased benefit of Opdualag in patients with tumour PD-L1 expression levels lower than 1%, the limitations of subgroup analyses preclude conclusions based on tumour PD-L1 expression status. Furthermore, the results do not exclude the possibility that patients with tumour PD-L1 expression levels of 1% or greater could derive benefit from Opdualag. Indeed, subgroup analysis of overall survival indicates an HR of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.24) for the subgroup with tumour PD-L1 expression levels of 1% or greater and an HR of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.59, 1.04) for the subgroup with tumour PD-L1 expression levels lower than 1%. Thus, from the clinical and statistical perspectives, the results support the efficacy of Opdualag irrespective of the tumour PD-L1 expression status.

Indication

The New Drug Submission for Opdualag was filed by the sponsor with the following proposed indication:

Opdualag (nivolumab and relatlimab) is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients (12 years and older and weighing at least 40 kg) with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

Following the review of the submitted data, Health Canada revised the proposed indication to refer to patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma who have not received prior systemic therapy for unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Accordingly, Health Canada approved the following indication:

Opdualag (nivolumab and relatlimab) is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years of age or older with unresectable or metastatic melanoma who have not received prior systemic therapy for unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

For more information, refer to the Opdualag Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Safety

The safety of Opdualag was assessed in 355 adult patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic melanoma in the pivotal clinical trial CA224047 (described in the Clinical Efficacy section). The median duration of treatment was 8.3 months (range: 0 to 38.8 months). In the Opdualag treatment arm, 54.9% of patients received Opdualag for at least 6 months and 38% of patients received Opdualag for at least 1 year. The exposure is considered adequate for the assessment of safety of Opdualag at the recommended clinical dosage.

The most frequently reported adverse reactions in patients treated with Opdualag (occurring with an incidence of 15% or greater) were fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, rash, pruritus, arthralgia, diarrhea, headache, nausea, hypothyroidism, cough, and decreased appetite. These adverse reactions are consistent with the known safety profile of nivolumab and the mechanism of action of relatlimab. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 34% of patients treated with Opdualag compared to 28% of patients treated with nivolumab. The most frequently reported serious adverse reactions in patients treated with Opdualag (occurring with an incidence of 1% or greater) were adrenal insufficiency, anemia, myocarditis, colitis, diarrhea, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and back pain. Fatal adverse reactions considered potentially related to treatment with Opdualag occurred in 4 (1.1%) patients and included hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, acute edema of the lung, pneumonitis, and multiorgan failure. Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation of study therapy were reported more frequently in the Opdualag arm (19.2%) compared with the nivolumab arm (11.7%). The increase in the rates of serious adverse reactions and adverse reactions resulting in discontinuation observed in Opdualag-treated patients was anticipated given that Opdualag is a combination therapy.

Immune-mediated adverse reactions, in some cases severe or fatal, were reported with Opdualag. These adverse reactions were consistent with the established safety profile for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. There were no unexpected safety signals identified. The risk of immune-mediated adverse reactions has been specifically addressed in a Serious Warnings and Precautions box in the Opdualag Product Monograph. In addition, recommendations for the management of immune-mediated adverse reactions have been included in the Opdualag Product Monograph.

For more information, refer to the Opdualag Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

7.2 Non-Clinical Basis for Decision

Opdualag is a fixed-dose combination of two immune checkpoint inhibitors, nivolumab and relatlimab. Health Canada’s review of the non-clinical data package of the Opdualag submission focused on the provided non-clinical studies of relatlimab, as nivolumab (Opdivo), an antibody directed against programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) receptor (anti-PD-1 antibody), has been authorized in Canada for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

In vitro functional studies demonstrated that relatlimab binds specifically and with high affinity to the loop insertion sequence of the D1 domain of the receptor known as human lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) to inhibit the negative regulatory function of LAG-3. The antitumour activity of anti-LAG-3 antibody used as a single agent or in combination with an anti-PD-1 antibody was demonstrated in vivo in murine tumour models using murine surrogate anti-LAG-3 antibodies since relatlimab does not cross-react with mouse LAG-3. In these models, the coadministration of anti-LAG-3 antibody and anti-PD-1 antibody exhibited greater antitumour activity compared to the administration of anti-LAG-3 antibody alone.

The results from a single-dose and various repeat-dose toxicokinetic studies in cynomolgus monkeys showed that systemic exposure to relatlimab was similar in males and females and increased in a dose-proportional manner. In repeat-dose toxicity studies, it was observed that monkeys receiving relatlimab (up to 100 mg/kg) or relatlimab (100 mg/kg) in combination with nivolumab (50 mg/kg) had increased drug exposure consistent with antibody accumulation following repeat dosing. While treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies were detected for relatlimab, their presence did not substantially affect the toxicokinetics of relatlimab or nivolumab.

Safety pharmacology assessments were conducted as part of the repeat-dose toxicology studies. No relatlimab- or nivolumab-related adverse effects on cardiovascular, respiratory, and neurologic functions were observed when relatlimab was administered alone at doses of up to 100 mg/kg or in combination with nivolumab administered at doses of up to 50 mg/kg, or when nivolumab was administered as a single agent at doses of up to 50 mg/kg.

In single-dose and repeat-dose toxicity studies in monkeys, the volume of distribution of relatlimab at steady state ranged from 62 to 79 mL/kg, suggesting limited extravascular distribution.

Reproductive and developmental toxicity studies were performed in mice with murine surrogate anti-LAG-3 antibodies. Repeat-dose toxicity studies conducted in cynomolgus monkeys revealed no notable changes in male or female reproductive organs; however, in the 1-month repeat-dose toxicity study in which animals received nivolumab and relatlimab, one male had inflammation within the central nervous system (choroid plexus, vasculature of the brain parenchyma, meninges, spinal cord) and the reproductive tract (epididymis, seminal vesicles, and testes) associated with clinical signs that necessitated euthanasia. These observations have been included in the Opdualag Product Monograph.

Despite the lack of definitive evidence of negative effects of relatlimab on pregnancy and embryo-fetal development in the non-clinical studies, the risk of adverse effects on pregnancy associated with the coadministration of nivolumab and relatlimab has been highlighted in the Opdualag Product Monograph. Checkpoint targets, including LAG-3, are likely to have a role in maintaining maternal tolerance to the developing fetus, and nivolumab has been shown to increase third trimester pregnancy loss in cynomolgus monkeys. Based on the mechanism of action, inhibition of LAG-3 with relatlimab can have a similar negative effect on pregnancy. Furthermore, human immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) is known to cross the placenta and since both nivolumab and relatlimab are IgG4 antibodies, they have the potential to be transmitted from the mother to the developing fetus. Accordingly, the Opdualag Product Monograph specifies that the use of Opdualag is not recommended during pregnancy and in women of childbearing potential not using effective contraception.

The results of the non-clinical studies as well as the potential risks to humans have been included in the Opdualag Product Monograph. In view of the intended use of Opdualag, there are no pharmacological or toxicological issues within this submission to preclude authorization of the product.

For more information, refer to the Opdualag Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

7.3 Quality Basis for Decision

Characterization of the Drug Substances

Opdualag is a fixed-dose combination of two human immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) monoclonal antibodies, nivolumab and relatlimab.

Nivolumab binds to the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor on T cells and blocks its interaction with its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, expressed on tumour cells, thereby reducing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response. The antibody consists of four polypeptide chain that include two identical heavy chains and two identical kappa light chains, covalently linked through disulfide bonds. The calculated molecular weight of nivolumab is 146,221 Da. Nivolumab (Opdivo) has been authorized in Canada for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

Relatlimab binds to the lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) receptor on T cells, blocks its interaction with ligands, and reduces LAG-3 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response. It consists of four polypeptide chains (two identical heavy chains and two identical kappa light chains, covalently linked through disulfide bonds) and has a calculated molecular weight of 148,178 Da.

Of note, the nivolumab protein used for manufacture of Opdualag is the same as the protein used for manufacture of the authorized drug product Opdivo. However, the protein used for manufacture of Opdivo is formulated in a citrate-based buffer (and herein referred to as nivolumab-citrate), while the protein used for manufacture of Opdualag is formulated at a higher concentration in a histidine-based buffer (and herein referred to as nivolumab-histidine). The change in formulation buffer enables combination of nivolumab with relatlimab in a single vial using the same buffer system. Extended characterization studies demonstrated comparability between nivolumab-histidine and nivolumab-citrate drug substances and supported consistent biological activity of the nivolumab molecule, irrespective of the formulation matrix.

Detailed characterization studies were performed to provide assurance that relatlimab consistently exhibits the desired characteristic structure and biological activity.

In addition, extended characterization studies demonstrated that combining the two protein components in Opdualag does not affect their respective physicochemical and biological properties, and does not lead to any protein-protein interactions beyond those observed for the individual protein components.

The product- and process-related impurities that were reported and characterized were found to be within established limits.

Manufacturing Process of the Drug Substances and Drug Product and Process Controls

The nivolumab-histidine and relatlimab drug substances are produced using respective genetically engineered Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines. The proteins are secreted products of the CHO cells cultured in fed-batch production bioreactors. After completion of the cell culture process, the secreted monoclonal antibody is purified from the harvest material by a series of chromatography, viral inactivation, and ultrafiltration/diafiltration steps. Subsequently, the purified drug substance is formulated, filtrated, filled into bioprocess containers, and stored frozen at -50 °C to -70 °C.

In comparison to the manufacturing process of nivolumab-citrate drug substance, the manufacturing process of nivolumab-histidine drug substance includes changes to accommodate a different drug substance formulation (protein concentration and final formulation matrix), enable frozen storage of the drug substance, and to align with the manufacturing facilities. Comparability studies demonstrated that the two manufacturing processes produced comparable nivolumab drug substances.

Process validation of the relatlimab manufacturing process consisted of three consecutive commercial-scale batches, followed by three additional batches used to validate process and equipment changes introduced after the initial validation. Process validation of the nivolumab-histidine manufacturing process consisted of four consecutive commercial-scale batches. Deviations during process validation of the nivolumab-histidine and relatlimab manufacturing processes were appropriately investigated and corrective actions were implemented where appropriate. Process validation results for the nivolumab-histidine and relatlimab manufacturing processes met the predefined acceptance criteria for all process parameters, in-process controls, release testing, characterization, and stability. The sponsor has demonstrated that the drug substance manufacturing facility is capable of consistently manufacturing nivolumab-histidine and relatlimab of acceptable quality.

The manufacturing process of the drug product, Opdualag, includes thawing of the two drug substances, mixing, pooling, and diluting to a target total protein concentration of 16 mg/mL, followed by bioburden reduction filtration, sterile filtration, filling into vials, capping, sealing with aluminum seals, visual inspection, and packaging. The drug product is stored at 2 °C to 8 °C. Three process validation lots of the drug product were manufactured at the proposed commercial-scale range, and met the predefined acceptance criteria and proposed commercial limits for all process parameters, in-process controls, release testing, and stability. The sponsor has demonstrated that the drug product manufacturing facility is capable of consistently manufacturing Opdualag of acceptable quality.

The criticality and ranges of process parameters, in-process controls, and quality attributes were appropriately assigned for the relatlimab drug substance, nivolumab-histidine drug substance, and Opdualag drug product. They were based on process development and characterization studies, and (in the case of the nivolumab-histidine drug substance) the sponsor’s past experience with the manufacturing of Opdivo. In addition, the process validation studies support the proposed commercial ranges. Extensive comparability studies were conducted, and all processes were found to be comparable in terms of product quality and consistency.

Control of the Drug Substances and Drug Product

Specifications established for the nivolumab-histidine drug substance, relatlimab drug substance, and Opdualag drug product were based on historical data and clinical experience, and are considered suitable for control of the drug substances and the drug product. Compendial methods were verified, and all the in-house methods were appropriately validated and/or transferred to their respective testing sites.

Opdualag is a Schedule D (biologic) drug and is, therefore, subject to Health Canada’s Lot Release Program before sale as per the Guidance for Sponsors: Lot Release Program for Schedule D (Biologic) Drugs.

Stability of the Drug Substances and Drug Product

Based on the stability data submitted, the proposed shelf life and storage conditions for the drug substances and drug product were adequately supported and are considered to be satisfactory.

The stability data support the proposed shelf life of 48 months for nivolumab-histidine and relatlimab drug substances, when they are stored protected from light at -60 °C, and 36 months for Opdualag, when the drug product is stored protected from light at 2 °C to 8 °C.

The compatibility of the drug product with the primary container closure system was demonstrated through stability studies and extractables and leachables studies.

Facilities and Equipment

The design, operations, and controls of the facility and equipment involved in the production are considered suitable for the activities and products manufactured.

Based on the risk assessment scores determined by Health Canada, on-site evaluations of the drug substance and the drug product manufacturing facilities were not deemed necessary.

The sites involved in production are compliant with good manufacturing practices.

Adventitious Agents Safety Evaluation

The manufacturing processes of nivolumab and relatlimab drug substances and the drug product Opdualag incorporate adequate control measures to prevent introduction of non-viral and viral adventitious agents.

The master cell banks, working cell banks, and end-of-production cell banks are tested according to relevant guidelines to demonstrate sterility. In addition, pre-harvest culture fluid from each lot is tested for bioburden, endotoxin, mycoplasma, minute virus of mice (MVM), and other potential adventitious viral agents. Purification process steps designed to remove and inactivate viruses are adequately validated.

No animal-derived and human-derived raw materials are used in the manufacture of the drug substance and drug product. In addition, the excipients in the drug product formulation are not of animal or human origin.