Summary Basis of Decision for Tryngolza

Review decision

The Summary Basis of Decision explains why the product was approved for sale in Canada. The document includes regulatory, safety, effectiveness and quality (in terms of chemistry and manufacturing) considerations.


Product type:

Drug
Summary Basis of Decision (SBD)

Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) documents provide information related to the original authorization of a product. The SBD for Tryngolza is located below.

Recent Activity for Tryngolza

The SBDs written for eligible drugs (as outlined in Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision [SBD] Project: Phase II) approved after September 1, 2012 will be updated to include post-authorization information. This information will be compiled in a Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT). The PAAT will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada's decisions were negative or positive. The PAATs will be updated regularly with post-authorization activity throughout the product life cycle. At this time, no PAAT is available for Tryngolza. When the PAAT for Tryngolza becomes available, it will be incorporated into this SBD.

Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) for Tryngolza

Date SBD issued: 2026-04-13

The following information relates to the New Drug Submission for Tryngolza.

Olezarsen sodium

Drug Identification Number (DIN): DIN 02563886 - 80 mg/0.8 mL olezarsen, solution, subcutaneous injection

Theratechnologies Inc.

New Drug Submission Control Number: 297894

Submission Type: New Drug Submission (New Active Substance) - Priority Review

Therapeutic Area (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] Classification, second level): C10 Lipid modifying agents

Date Filed: 2025-05-09

Authorization Date: 2025-12-16

On December 16, 2025, Health Canada issued a Notice of Compliance to Theratechnologies Inc. for the drug product Tryngolza.

The market authorization of Tryngolza was based on quality (chemistry and manufacturing), non‑clinical (pharmacology and toxicology), and clinical (pharmacology, safety, and efficacy) information submitted. Based on Health Canada’s review, the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of Tryngolza is favourable as an adjunct to diet for the treatment of adult patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome to reduce triglyceride levels.

1 What was approved?

Tryngolza, a lipid modifying agent, was authorized as an adjunct to diet for the treatment of adult patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome to reduce triglyceride levels. All patients enrolled in the pivotal Balance study for Tryngolza had genetically confirmed familial chylomicronemia syndrome.

Tryngolza is not authorized for use in pediatric patients (under 18 years of age), as no clinical safety or efficacy data are available for this population.

No clinically significant differences in the efficacy or safety of Tryngolza were observed in geriatric patients (65 years of age or older) compared to younger patients.

Tryngolza (80 mg/0.8 mL olezarsen) is supplied as solution and administered subcutaneously once a month. In addition to the medicinal ingredient, the solution contains disodium hydrogen phosphate, sodium chloride, sodium dihydrogen phosphate, hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide, and water for injection.

The use of Tryngolza is contraindicated in patients who are hypersensitive to this drug or to any ingredient in the formulation, including any non-medicinal ingredient, or component of the container.

The drug product was approved for use under the conditions stated in its Product Monograph taking into consideration the potential benefits and risks associated with its use. The Product Monograph for Tryngolza is available through the Drug Product Database.

For more information about the rationale for Health Canada's decision, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

2 Why was Tryngolza approved?

Health Canada considers that the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of Tryngolza is favourable as an adjunct to diet for the treatment of adult patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome to reduce triglyceride levels.

Familial chylomicronemia syndrome is a rare, serious, autosomal recessive, inherited genetic disorder characterized by severely impaired lipoprotein lipase function, resulting in severe hypertriglyceridemia and hyperchylomicronemia. Patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome typically have triglyceride levels that are approximately 10 to 100 times higher than the normal reference value of less than 150 mg/dL (<1.7 mmol/L), not otherwise explained by secondary factors such as obesity, alcohol consumption, insulin resistance, diabetes, other underlying diseases, or the use of certain medications. Diagnosis of familial chylomicronemia syndrome can occur at any age, and the condition has an estimated worldwide prevalence of approximately 1 to 13 per million, although prevalence rates vary by geographic region. The disorder is caused by homozygous, compound heterozygous, or double heterozygous, loss-of-function, null, or nonsense mutations in the lipoprotein lipase gene or in several genes that encode proteins that regulate lipoprotein lipase activity. Reduced lipoprotein lipase activity impairs triglycerides clearance, leading to chylomicrons accumulation in plasma and resulting in severe hypertriglyceridemia and hyperchylomicronemia, as large chylomicrons remain in the circulation, even after prolonged fasting. Hypertriglyceridemia and hyperchylomicronemia can lead to medical complications, most notably an increased risk of acute pancreatitis, as patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome are prone to recurrent, potentially life-threatening episodes. In addition, patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome frequently experience eruptive xanthomas, lipemia retinalis, and recurrent abdominal pain, while hepatomegaly and splenomegaly may also occur.

Although genetic testing is considered the definitive method for diagnosing familial chylomicronemia syndrome, it is not always feasible, and patients may not always have access to it. Whether genetically confirmed or not, patients consistently present with markedly elevated triglyceride levels and are at risk for complications such as pancreatitis.

The first-line of treatment for patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome is a strict dietary fat restriction to less than 20 grams of fat per day, along with avoiding alcohol. Even short-term consumption of dietary fat or small amounts of alcohol can raise triglyceride levels and increase the risk of acute pancreatitis. Even among patients who do adhere strictly to the recommended diet, triglyceride levels often remain elevated, thereby sustaining an ongoing risk of acute pancreatitis. Niacin, fibrates, and statins are approved in Canada for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia but are ineffective for managing severe hypertriglyceridemia associated with familial chylomicronemia syndrome, as they primarily work by increasing the activity of lipoprotein lipase, a protein which is absent or severely deficient in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome. Therefore, the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome remains an unmet clinical need.

Olezarsen, is an antisense oligonucleotide-triantennary N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc3) conjugate. Antisense oligonucleotides are short, synthetic strings of nucleotides designed to prevent the expression of a targeted protein by selectively binding to the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) that encodes the target protein, thereby degrading the mRNA and preventing translation. Olezarsen selectively binds to apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) mRNA, leading to degradation by ribonuclease H1, which results in a lack of apoC-III protein.

Apolipoprotein C-III is a glycoprotein synthesized principally in the liver and is a potent inhibitor of lipoprotein lipase, the primary enzyme responsible for hydrolyzing plasma triglycerides. In addition, apoC-III protein also regulates the metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins through lipoprotein lipase independent pathways. These pathways may play an important role in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome, who have a deficiency in lipoprotein lipase activity and markedly increased risk of acute pancreatitis. Targeting apoC-III with an antisense oligonucleotide is a new approach to treating familial chylomicronemia syndrome.

The efficacy of Tryngolza was demonstrated in a single pivotal study, ISIS 678354-CS3, herein referred to as the Balance study. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study enrolled 66 patients with genetically confirmed familial chylomicronemia syndrome, and fasting triglyceride levels of at least 880 mg/dL (≥10 mmol/L). Following a screening and run-in period during which patients adhered to a diet containing no more than 20 grams of fat per day, participants were then randomly assigned to receive either Tryngolza 50 mg or Tryngolza 80 mg in a 1:1 ratio. Each cohort was then further randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive monthly doses of Tryngolza or a matching volume placebo, respectively.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean percent change in fasting triglyceride levels from baseline to Month 6 compared to placebo. Of the 66 patients enrolled, 23 patients received a placebo, 21 patients received Tryngolza 50 mg, and 22 patients received Tryngolza 80 mg every 4 weeks.

The results from the Balance study showed that the placebo-adjusted percent change in fasting triglycerides from baseline to Month 6 for the Tryngolza 80 mg treatment group versus placebo was ‑42.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -69.085, -17.921) favouring Tryngolza 80 mg over a placebo with a statistically significant p-value <0.05. Tryngolza 50 mg treatment group compared to the placebo group was not statistically significant. This dosage strength was not proposed for market authorization by the sponsor.

Other study endpoints included a comparison of acute pancreatitis events at Month 12 after initiation of Tryngolza treatment versus placebo. At Month 12, a relevant reduction in the incidence of acute pancreatitis was observed, with 11 events reported in the placebo group and one event reported in the Tryngolza 80 mg treatment group.

In study ISIS 678354-CS8, a Phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 154 patients with hypertriglyceridemia and an established or increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, or with severe hypertriglyceridemia who did not have familial chylomicronemia syndrome were randomized to receive either Tryngolza 50 mg and 80 mg administered once every 4 weeks over a 53-week treatment period. The primary efficacy endpoint, consistent with the Balance study, was the percent change in fasting triglyceride levels from baseline to Month 6 compared with placebo. The results from the ISIS 678354-CS8 study demonstrated a reduction in triglyceride levels in patients with, or at high risk of, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who did not have familial chylomicronemia syndrome.

Although the Balance study enrolled only patients with genetically confirmed familial chylomicronemia syndrome, Health Canada accepted a revised indication based on the rationale that not all patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome have access to genetic testing. However, because the Balance study included only genetically confirmed familial chylomicronemia syndrome patients, a limitation-of-use statement was added to the indication to inform the prescriber.

The safety profile of Tryngolza was evaluated based on safety data from the Balance study and two interim open-label studies, ISIS 678354-CS13 and ISIS 678354‑CS7. The ISIS 678354-CS13 study is an ongoing the open-label extension of the Balance study, in which all patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome continued or switched to Tryngolza 80 mg. The ISIS 678354-CS7 is an ongoing open-label study in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome who were previously treated with volanesorsen.

The most common adverse reaction in the combined safety analysis (89 patients) were injection site erythema (17%), chills (7%), myalgia (7%), injection site pain (6%), and hypersensitivity (2%). Serious adverse reactions that were reported included treatment emergent bleeding events (2%), hepatic adverse events (1%), and sudden death (1%). No deaths were considered related to study drug.

In the Balance study (66 patients), the most common adverse reactions occurring in at least 5% of patients, and that occurred more frequently in patients treated with Tryngolza (43 patients) compared to patient treated with placebo (23 patients) were injection site reactions (19% vs 9%), arthralgia (9% vs 0%), and platelet count decrease (12% vs 4%). These adverse reactions have been included in the Product Monograph for Tryngolza. Adverse reactions leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 7% of patients receiving Tryngolza, compared with 0% of patients receiving a placebo. The most common reason for discontinuing Tryngolza was hypersensitivity reactions.

Adverse events of special interest included thrombocytopenia. In the Balance study, the proportion of patients who experienced thrombocytopenia treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was higher in the Tryngolza 80 mg group (3 [13%] patients) compared with the placebo group (1 [4.3%] patient). Overall, a greater proportion of patients in the Tryngolza 80 mg group (59.1%) experienced two or more episodes of platelet counts below the limit of normal compared to the placebo group (30.4%). However, a similar proportion of patients in the placebo group (13%) experienced a platelet count reduction of at least 50% in the Tryngolza 80 mg (13%) treatment group. Patients with thrombocytopenia TEAEs did not experience concurrent major bleeding events. A recommendation to obtain a baseline platelet count and monitor platelet levels during treatment as clinically necessary was included in the Product Monograph for Tryngolza. One death was reported in the Balance study, a sudden death in a patient treated with Tryngolza 50 mg, that the study investigator deemed as unrelated to the study drug.

A modest increase in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, fasting glucose and hemoglobin A1C were observed over time with Tryngolza treatment in the familial chylomicronemia syndrome population in the pivotal study. These have been included in the Product Monograph for Tryngolza with a recommendation to obtain baseline levels and monitor during treatment with Tryngolza, as clinically indicated.

Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were numerically higher in patients treated with Tryngolza in the supportive study carried out in a non-familial chylomicronemia syndrome population with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or at increased risk of developing ASCVD, Study ISIS 678354-CS8. No familial chylomicronemia syndrome patients treated with Tryngolza experienced any components of adjudicated MACE events, including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal ischemic stroke, and arterial revascularization, that were assessed as related to study drug. It was recommended in the Product Monograph for Tryngolza to assess the patient’s comorbidities prior to initiating Tryngolza treatment.

Safety data on the use of Tryngolza in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome were limited at time of market authorization, due to small sample sizes in the clinical trials as a result of the rare disease nature of this condition. While the risk of thrombocytopenia and bleeding events or, hepatotoxicity or renal toxicity may not have been fully elucidated during clinical development of Tryngolza, these adverse reactions have been identified with other antisense oligonucleotides and therefore cannot be completely excluded.

A Risk Management Plan (RMP) for Tryngolza was submitted by Theratechnologies Inc. to Health Canada which is designed to describe known and potential safety issues, to present the monitoring scheme, and when needed, to describe measures that will be put in place to minimize risks associated with the product. Upon review, the RMP was considered to be acceptable. Thrombocytopenia and hepatotoxicity have been included in the Risk Management Plan as important potential risks warranting close monitoring in the post-marketing setting.

The submitted inner and outer labels, package insert, Patient Medication Information section of the Product Monograph for Tryngolza met the necessary regulatory labelling, plain language, and design element requirements following the requested revisions.

Overall, Tryngolza has been shown to have a favourable benefit-harm-uncertainty profile based on the Balance study. The identified safety issues are managed through labelling and clinical monitoring. Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the Product Monograph for Tryngolza to address the identified safety concerns.

This New Drug Submission complies with the requirements of sections C.08.002 and C.08.005.1 and therefore Health Canada has issued the Notice of Compliance pursuant to section C.08.004 of the Food and Drug Regulations. For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

3 What steps led to the approval of Tryngolza?

The New Drug Submission for Tryngolza was subject to an expedited review process under the Priority Review of Drug Submissions Policy. The sponsor presented substantial evidence of clinical effectiveness to demonstrate that Tryngolza, in conjunction to diet, provides an effect treatment in reducing triglyceride levels in adult patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome, a serious, life-threatening disease that is not adequately managed by a drug marketed in Canada.

The review of the New Drug Submission (NDS) for Tryngolza was based on a critical assessment of the data package submitted to Health Canada. The reviews completed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were used as added references for the review of the quality, non-clinical, and clinical components of the NDS, as per Method 3 described in the Draft Guidance Document: The Use of Foreign Reviews by Health Canada. The Canadian regulatory decision on the Tryngolza NDS was made independently based on the Canadian review.

As part of the NDS package, the submission included a pediatric development plan that had been provided to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) as part of Health Canada’s Pilot on pediatric development plans and studies.

For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Guidance Document: The Management of Drug Submissions and Applications.

Submission Milestones: Tryngolza

Submission Milestone

Date

Request for priority status filed

2025-03-28

Request for priority status approved

2025-04-23

New Drug Submission filed

2025-05-09

Screening

Screening Deficiency Notice issued

2025-06-06

Response to Screening Deficiency Notice filed

2025-06-19

Screening Acceptance Letter issued

2025-06-19

Review

Biopharmaceutics evaluation completed

2025-11-28

Quality evaluation completed

2025-12-12

Non-clinical evaluation completed

2025-12-12

Review of Risk Management Plan completed

2025-12-15

Clinical/medical evaluation completed

2025-12-15

Labelling review completed

2025-12-15

Notice of Compliance issued by Director General, Pharmaceutical Drugs Directorate

2025-12-16

4 What follow-up measures will the company take?

Requirements for post-market commitments are outlined in the Food and Drugs Act and Food and Drug Regulations.

5 What post-authorization activity has taken place for Tryngolza?

Summary Basis of Decision documents (SBDs) for eligible drugs (as outlined in Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision [SBD] Project: Phase II) authorized after September 1, 2012 will include post-authorization information in a table format. The Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT) will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada’s decisions were negative or positive. The PAAT will continue to be updated during the product life cycle.

At this time, no PAAT is available for Tryngolza. When available, the PAAT will be incorporated into this SBD.

For the latest advisories, warnings and recalls for marketed products, see MedEffect Canada.

6 What other information is available about drugs?

Up-to-date information on drug products can be found at the following links:

7 What was the scientific rationale for Health Canada’s decision?

Refer to the What steps led to the approval of Tryngolza? section for more information about the review process for this submission.

7.1 Clinical Basis for Decision

Clinical Pharmacology

Olezarsen is an antisense oligonucleotide-triantennary N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc3) conjugate that binds to apoliprotein C-III (apoC-III) messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) leading to ribonuclease H1-mediated mRNA degradation and resulting in a decrease of triglycerides through a reduction of serum apoC-III protein.

Apolipoprotein C-III is a glycoprotein synthesized principally in the liver and is a potent inhibitor of lipoprotein lipase, the primary enzyme responsible for hydrolyzing plasma triglycerides. Additionally, apoC-III protein also regulates the metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins through lipoprotein lipase independent pathways. These pathways play an important role in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome, who have a deficiency in lipoprotein lipase activity and a markedly increased risk of acute pancreatitis.

In the Phase III Balance study described in the Clinical Efficacy section, Tryngolza was administered subcutaneously using a vial formulation for both the 50 mg and 80 mg doses. In contrast, 50 mg and 80 mg autoinjector formulations were introduced in the Phase III, open-label extension study (ISIS 678354-CS13), representing the intended commercial presentation. As such, a bioequivalence study, ISIS 678354-CS20 was conducted to link the two subcutaneous formulations at two dose levels.

The ISIS 678354-CS20 study was a single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover bioequivalence study conducted under fasting conditions in healthy, adult participants. The aim was to link two subcutaneous formulations at two dose levels as follows:

  • autoinjector (62.5 mg/mL [Treatment A]) and vial (100 mg/mL [Treatment B]) at the 50 mg dose;

  • autoinjector (100 mg/mL [Treatment C]) and vial (100 mg/mL [Treatment D]) at the 80 mg dose.

The overall results from the ISIS 678354-CS20 study showed that the current Canadian standards to determine comparative bioavailability of the test product (autoinjector) and the reference product (vial) were met for both the 50 mg dose (Treatment A versus Treatment B) and the 80 mg dose (Treatment C versus Treatment D). These standards were met on log transformed parameters calculated from the measured data. The standards were also met when a delivered dose correction (based on volume) was applied to the data. The ISIS 678354-CS20 study results therefore demonstrated that subcutaneous administration of Tryngolza via an autoinjector was comparable to the administration from a vial using a syringe.

For further details, please refer to the Product Monograph for Tryngolza, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Efficacy

The clinical efficacy of Tryngolza was demonstrated in a single pivotal study, ISIS 678354-CS3, herein referred to as the Balance study. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study enrolled 66 patients with genetically confirmed familial chylomicronemia syndrome, and fasting triglyceride levels of at least 880 mg/dL (≥10 mmol/L). Patients were screened and enrolled based on documented loss-of-function variants in genes associated with complete or partial lipoprotein lipase deficiency, an enzyme that hydrolyzes triglycerides carried by triglyceride-rich lipoproteins into free fatty acids.

Following screening, eligible patients entered a four to eight week diet stabilization/run-in period during which patients adhered to a diet containing no more than 20 grams of fat per day. Patients were then randomized to receive either Tryngolza 50 mg (Cohort A) or Tryngolza 80 mg (Cohort B) in a 1:1 ratio. Each cohort was then further randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive monthly doses of Tryngolza or a matching volume placebo, respectively.

Patients in Cohort A received either 50 mg of Tryngolza or a matching volume placebo (0.5 mL) once every 4 weeks. Patients in Cohort B received 80 mg of Tryngolza or a matching volume placebo (0.8 mL) once every 4 weeks. Dietary counseling commenced at the start of the diet stabilization/run-in period and was reinforced at intervals throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

During the treatment phase of the study, blood chemistry and lipid/apolipoprotein samples were collected approximately every four weeks to evaluate the effect of Tryngolza on fasting triglycerides levels, with the primary endpoint being the percent change from baseline in fasting triglycerides levels at Month 6 compared to placebo.

Following the Week 53 visit, eligible patients could then choose to enroll in an open-label extension study, ISIS 678354-CS13. Patients who declined participation entered a 13-week post-treatment evaluation period.

Patient demographics and baseline characteristics were generally comparable across the three treatment groups. At enrollment, the proportion of patients with diabetes was 32% in the Tryngolza 80 mg group, 14% in the Tryngolza 50 mg group, and 26% in the placebo group. Across all groups, patients were receiving statins (24%), omega-3 fatty acids (38%), fibrates (46%), or other lipid-lowering therapies (9%) at study entry. Overall, 71% of patients had a documented history of acute pancreatitis within the previous 10 years. The mean fasting triglyceride level at baseline was 2,629.5 (1,315.45) mg/dL (29.71 [14.86] mmol/L).

The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean percent change in fasting triglyceride levels from baseline to Month 6 compared to placebo. Of the 66 patients enrolled, 23 patients received a placebo, 21 patients received Tryngolza 50 mg, and 22 patients received Tryngolza 80 mg every 4 weeks over a 53-week treatment period.

The results from the Balance study showed that the placebo-adjusted mean percent change in fasting triglyceride levels from baseline to Month 6 for the Tryngolza 80 mg treatment group was ‑42.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -69.085, -17.921) favouring Tryngolza 80 mg over placebo with a statistically significant p-value of <0.05. In contrast, the difference between Tryngolza 50 mg treatment group and the placebo group was not statistically significant. This dosage strength was not proposed for market authorization by the sponsor.

Other study endpoints included a comparison of acute pancreatitis events at Month 12 after initiation of Tryngolza treatment versus placebo. At Month 12, a clinically relevant reduction in the incidence of acute pancreatitis was observed, with 11 events reported in the placebo group and one event in the Tryngolza 80 mg treatment group.

Indication

The New Drug Submission for Tryngolza was filed by the sponsor with the following proposed indication:

Tryngolza (olezarsen injection) is indicated as an adjunct to diet in adult patients for the treatment of familial chylomicronemia syndrome.

Health Canada approved the following indication:

Tryngolza (Olezarsen injection) is indicated as an adjunct to diet for the treatment of adult patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome to reduce triglyceride levels.

All patients enrolled in the pivotal Balance study for Tryngolza had genetically confirmed familial chylomicronemia syndrome.

Although the Balance study enrolled only patients with genetically confirmed familial chylomicronemia syndrome, Health Canada accepted a revised indication based on the rationale that not all patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome have access to genetic testing. Furthermore, the mechanism of action of Tryngolza (i.e., targeting apoC‑III) is expected to lower triglyceride levels in all patients familial chylomicronemia syndrome. As the Balance study included only patients with genetically confirmed familial chylomicronemia syndrome, a limitation of use statement was added to the indication to inform the prescriber.

Overall Analysis of Efficacy

Overall, the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile was favourable for Tryngolza 80 mg for subcutaneous injection every month as an adjunct to diet for the treatment of adult patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome to reduce triglyceride levels when used under the conditions of use recommended in the Product Monograph for Tryngolza. Therefore, a Notice of Compliance was recommended by Health Canada.

For more information, refer to the Product Monograph for Tryngolza, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Safety

The clinical safety of Tryngolza was evaluated based on safety data from the Balance study and two interim open-label studies, ISIS 678354-CS13 and ISIS 678354‑CS7. The ISIS 678354-CS13 study is an ongoing the open-label extension of the Balance study, in which all patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome either continued or switched to Tryngolza 80 mg. The ISIS 678354-CS7 is an ongoing open-label study in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome who were previously treated with volanesorsen.

The most common adverse reaction in the combined safety analysis (89 patients) were injection site erythema (17%), chills (7%), myalgia (7%), injection site pain (6%), and hypersensitivity (2%). Serious adverse reactions that were reported included treatment emergent bleeding events (2%), hepatic adverse events (1%), and sudden death (1%). No deaths were considered related to study drug by the investigator.

In the Balance study (66 patients), the most common adverse reactions that occurred in at least 5% of patients, and that occurred more frequently in patients treated with Tryngolza (43 patients) compared with patients treated with placebo (23 patients) were injection site reactions (8 [19%] patients vs 2 [9%] patients), a decrease in platelet count (5 [12%] patients vs 1 [4%] patient), and arthralgia (4 [9%] patients vs 0% patients). Adverse reactions leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 7% of patients receiving Tryngolza, compared with 0% of patients receiving a placebo. The most common reason for discontinuing Tryngolza was hypersensitivity reactions. Hypersensitivity reactions (including symptoms such as bronchospasm, diffuse erythema, facial swelling, urticaria, chills, myalgia) have been reported. Based on the data, a serious hypersensitivity reaction may occur following multiple exposures to the drug or after an initial exposure. If a severe hypersensitivity reaction occurs, it is advised in the Product Monograph to immediately discontinue Tryngolza.

Adverse events of special interest included thrombocytopenia. In the Balance study, a higher proportion of patients in the Tryngolza 80 mg group (3 [13%] patients) experienced thrombocytopenia treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) compared to the placebo group (1 [4.3%] patient). Overall, a greater proportion of patients in the Tryngolza 80 mg (59.1%) group experienced two or more episodes of platelet counts below the limit of normal compared to the placebo (30.4%) group. However, a similar proportion of patients in the placebo group (13%) experienced a platelet count reduction of at least 50% with the Tryngolza 80 mg (13%) treatment group. Patients with thrombocytopenia TEAEs did not, experienced concurrent major bleeding events. A decrease in platelets and thrombocytopenia were included in the Product Monograph for Tryngolza, together with a recommendation to obtain a baseline platelet count and perform monitoring during treatment.

A modest increase in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, fasting glucose and hemoglobin A1C were observed over time with Tryngolza treatment in the familial chylomicronemia syndrome population in the pivotal study. These have been included in the Product Monograph for Tryngolza with a recommendation to obtain baseline levels and monitor during treatment with Tryngolza, as clinically indicated.

Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were numerically higher in patients treated with Tryngolza in the supportive study carried out in a non-familial chylomicronemia syndrome population with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or at increased risk of developing ASCVD, Study ISIS 678354-CS8. No familial chylomicronemia syndrome patients treated with Tryngolza experienced any components of adjudicated MACE events, including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal ischemic stroke, and arterial revascularization, that were assessed as related to study drug. It was recommended in the Product Monograph for Tryngolza to assess the patient’s comorbidities prior to Tryngolza treatment.

At the time of marketing authorization, safety data on the use of Tryngolza in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome were limited. While the risk of thrombocytopenia and bleeding events or, hepatotoxicity or renal toxicity has not been fully elucidated during clinical development, these adverse reactions have been identified with some other antisense oligonucleotides and cannot be completely excluded.

For more information, refer to the Product Monograph for Tryngolza, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

7.2 Non-Clinical Basis for Decision

The non-clinical review of Tryngolza (olezarsen) included pharmacological, pharmacokinetic, and general toxicity studies. These studies were conducted in mice and cynomolgus monkeys using the subcutaneous route of administration reflecting the intended use in human clinical studies.

Olezarsen demonstrated pharmacological activity consistent with its intended mechanism of action, with safety pharmacology evaluations showing no adverse effects on cardiovascular, respiratory, or central nervous system function at exposures exceeding clinical levels.

The results from toxicology studies demonstrated that olezarsen was generally well-tolerated across various dose levels in mice and cynomolgus monkeys. In mice, tested doses ranged from 2 to 24 mg/kg/week, and in monkeys, from 2 to 30 mg/kg/week. A common finding in both species included basophilic granules in the liver, kidney, lymph nodes, and other tissues. These findings are common to oligonucleotides and represent histological evidence of intracellular oligonucleotide accumulation. Key findings included dose dependent organ (liver, spleen) weight changes, increases in liver enzymes (i.e., aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase), and hematological alterations.

Based on in vitro drug-drug interaction studies, olezarsen has low potential for drug-drug interactions because it is not metabolized through classical pathways (cytochrome P450 and uridine 5’-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase enzymes) nor interacts with transporters.

Olezarsen did not show genotoxic potential in vitro or in vivo. In a reproductive toxicity study in mice, there were no treatment-related effects on fertility, embryonic development, or reproductive health at doses up to 20 mg/kg. Carcinogenicity studies were not conducted for olezarsen, which was accepted based on similarities with volanesorsen (the unconjugated form of olezarsen). The sponsor provided the reports of the relevant studies with volanesorsen and they were reviewed within this submission. In carcinogenicity studies with volanesorsen, conducted in mice and rats, increased incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas, malignant fibrous histiocytomas, hemangiosarcomas, and histiocytic sarcomas were observed. These tumours are considered a response to chronic tissue irritation and inflammation caused by repeated subcutaneous injection, and have been reported with other antisense oligonucleotides. The clinical relevance of these findings is uncertain. The reliance on data from volanesorsen due to the lack of direct carcinogenicity studies and full reproductive toxicity data for olezarsen introduces uncertainty about the findings. The main results of the non-clinical program as well as the potential risks and uncertainties to humans are included in the Product Monograph for Tryngolza.

In conclusion, based on the non-clinical studies submitted in the New Drug Submission for Tryngolza, the data were considered adequate and acceptable for the assessment of non-clinical aspects.

For more information, refer to the Product Monograph for Tryngolza, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

7.3 Quality Basis for Decision

The quality (chemistry and manufacturing) information submitted for Tryngolza has demonstrated that the drug substance and drug product can be consistently manufactured to meet the approved specifications. Proper pharmaceutical development and supporting studies were conducted and an adequate control strategy is in place for the commercial processes. Changes to the manufacturing process and formulation (if any) made throughout the pharmaceutical development are considered acceptable upon review. Based on the stability data submitted, the proposed shelf life is acceptable when the drug product is stored in a refrigerator (2 ºC to 8 ºC) and protected from light.

The proposed drug-related impurity limits are considered adequately qualified (e.g., within International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use limits and/or qualified from toxicological studies, as needed).

A risk assessment for the potential presence of nitrosamine impurities was conducted according to requirements outlined in Health Canada’s Guidance on Nitrosamine Impurities in Medications. The risks relating to the potential presence of nitrosamine impurities in the drug substance and/or drug product are considered negligible or have been adequately addressed (e.g., with qualified limits and a suitable control strategy).

All sites involved in production are compliant with good manufacturing practices.

None of the non-medicinal ingredients (excipients) in the drug product are prohibited for use in drug products by the Food and Drug Regulations.

None of the excipients used in the formulation of Tryngolza is of human or animal origin.